Biomarker May Predict Response to Common Leukemia Treatment Interview with:

Dr Laura Eadie PhD Post Doctoral Researcher Affiliate Lecturer Discipline of Medicine University of Adelaide

Dr. Laura Eadie

Dr Laura Eadie PhD
Post Doctoral Researcher
Affiliate Lecturer Discipline of Medicine
University of Adelaide

Summary: Researchers based at SAHMRI (South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute) in Adelaide, South Australia have recently demonstrated the significance of early increases in the expression of ABCB1 in predicting long-term response to imatinib therapy. Lead researcher, Dr Laura Eadie, has recently had these findings published in the journal Leukemia and says that she hopes “the evidence provided by the study could be used to inform better patient treatment in the future”. What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?

Response: ABCB1 (p-glycoprotein) is a membrane transporter known to be involved in the efflux of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that are used to treat chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Overexpression of ABCB1 has also been demonstrated to cause resistance to the TKIs imatinib, nilotinib and dasatinib in vitro. Although studied previously in CML patients, the predictive value of ABCB1 in determining a patient’s long-term response to imatinib had not been realized … until now.

Previous studies investigating ABCB1 as a predictive biomarker focused on expression levels of ABCB1 at one time point in isolation. For our study, we have measured the levels of ABCB1 at two separate time points specified in the TIDEL II trial protocol: day 1 (prior to the start of imatinib therapy) and day 22 (three weeks on imatinib). We then calculated the fold rise in ABCB1 expression levels at day 22 compared with day 1 and grouped patients about the median into high and low fold rise. When we compared molecular outcomes for patients within these two ABCB1 expression groups we noticed a striking difference in outcome to imatinib therapy. What should readers take away from your report?

Response: We found that patients with a high fold rise in ABCB1 at day 22 were significantly less likely to achieve:
– early molecular response (EMR, BCR-ABL1IS ⩽10% at 3 months): 80 vs. 91%, p=0.001
– major molecular response (MMR, BCR-ABL1IS ⩽0.1%) by 12 months: 48 vs. 78% p<0.0001
– MMR by 24 months: 62 vs. 89%, p<0.0001
– MR4.5 (4.5-log reduction in BCR-ABL1IS from baseline) by 12 months: 11 vs 25%, p=0.043
– MR4.5 by 24 months: 19 vs. 53%, p<0.0001

Additionally, patients who went on to develop mutations that made them resistant to their therapy or who underwent disease progression or even succumbed to their disease were more likely to have increased levels of ABCB1 mRNA before they lost response to their imatinib treatment.

Because the TIDEL II trial specifies a switch to nilotinib for patient’s who fail imatinib therapy and nilotinib is also likely transported by ABCB1, we also wanted to correlate a patient’s ABCB1 expression with their response to subsequent nilotinib therapy following imatinib failure. We found that the majority of patients with a low fold rise in ABCB1 mRNA achieved MMR following the switch to nilotinib (82%). Conversely, patients with a high fold rise in ABCB1 at the time of switching therapy were less likely to achieve MMR (49%)

We also noted that patients with a high fold rise in ABCB1 mRNA performed poorly long term, with only 67% remaining on study after 24 months, compared with 84% of low fold rise patients. Taken together, these results suggest that nilotinib may be a poor therapy choice for patients with a high fold rise in ABCB1 mRNA. What recommendations do you have for future research as a result of this study?

Response: In the future we hopes to validate these findings in other trials; we are currently investigating whether ABCB1 can be used as a predictive biomarker for CML patients receiving up front nilotinib therapy.

We are also further investigating the mechanism by which ABCB1 expression increases in these patients who respond poorly to imatinib. Preliminary assessment of ABCB1 protein levels in day 1 vs. day 22 samples suggest that the greater increase in ABCB1 we are noticing may be due to clonal selection of ABCB1-expressing granulocytes, but further work needs to be done in this area to confirm these observations. Is there anything else you would like to add?

Response: Assessment of ABCB1 mRNA could serve as an easily transferrable test to predict the likelihood for a patient achieving a deep molecular response. This study could potentially help treating clinicians to make a therapy decision within the first month of imatinib therapy. Treatment regimens could be modified pre-emptivly, preventing a patient losing response to therapy and maximizing a patient’s probability of long-term survival. Thank you for your contribution to the community.


L N Eadie, P Dang, V A Saunders, D T Yeung, M P Osborn, A P Grigg, T P Hughes, D L White. The clinical significance of ABCB1 overexpression in predicting outcome of CML patients undergoing first-line imatinib treatment.Leukemia, 2016;
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2016.179

Note: Content is Not intended as medical advice. Please consult your health care provider regarding your specific medical condition and questions.

More Medical Research Interviews on

[wysija_form id=”5″]

Last Updated on August 5, 2016 by Marie Benz MD FAAD