Evaluating Liver Fat On Cardiac CT Helps Predict Risk vs Benefit of Statin Therapy

MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Venkatesh L. Murthy, MD, PhD, FACC, FASNC University of Michigan
Venkatesh L. Murthy, MD, PhD, FACC, FASNC

University of Michigan

Dr. Ravi Shah MD Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Centerand Dr. Ravi Shah MD
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

 


MedicalResearch: What is the background for this study?

Response: Recent changes recommend statin therapy for cardiovascular risk reduction in an increasingly large number of Americans. Conversely, a number of studies have identified an increased risk of diabetes with statin treatment. Thus, there is increasing need for tools to target statin therapy to those with a favorable risk-benefit profile.

MedicalResearch: What are the main findings?

Response: In our study, we analyzed data from 3,153 individuals from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis who underwent CT scanning at baseline for assessment of calcium score. The CT scans were analyzed to assess liver attenuation as a measure of the amount of liver fat. We demonstrated that high liver fat doubled the risk of diabetes over a median of 9 years of follow-up. Importantly, statin therapy also doubled the risk of diabetes. The two together had an additive effect, even after adjusting for BMI, age, gender, family history of diabetes, waist circumference, lipids, hsCRP and exercise habits. As in prior studies, the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events increased with increasing calcium score, as has previously been shown in MESA and in other studies.

We then divided the cohort into six groups based on calcium score (0, 1-100 and >100) and liver fat (low/high). Using published data from meta-analyses of statin trials, we computed the number needed to treat to prevent one hard CVD event for statin therapy. Using data from our study, we computed the number needed to harm to cause one additional case of diabetes from statin therapy. The numbers needed to treat with ranged from 29-40 for calcium score of >100 to 218-252 for calcium score of 0. Conversely, the numbers needed to harm were approximately 63-68 for those with low liver fat versus 22-24 for those with high liver fat. Thus the combination of calcium score and liver fat assessment, from a single standard calcium score scan, allows for physicians to provide better assessment of risk and benefit of statins in discussion with their patients.

MedicalResearch: What should clinicians and patients take away from your report?

Response: While it is well established that calcium score scans can help personalize CVD risk assessment and select optimal patients for statin therapy based on identifying those with greatest potential for benefit, a simple evaluation of the portion of the liver which is seen at the edges of the scan can help physicians assess the risks of statin therapy as well. Although not every patient needs this type of scan, when a calcium score is ordered, assessment of liver fat may be a no or low cost additional assessment with additional clinically important information.

MedicalResearch: What recommendations do you have for future research as a result of this study?

Response: Exploration of the mechanisms whereby statins and liver fat may contribute to diabetes remains a very active area of investigation. We also do not yet have definitive evidence that a strategy of using calcium score combined with liver fat will optimize the balance of cardiovascular and diabetes risks or is cost effective.

Citation:

Liver Fat, Statin Use, and Incident Diabetes: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

AtherosclerosisIn Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available online 15 July 2015

Ravi V. Shah, Matthew A. Allison, Joao A.C. Lima, David A. Bluemke, Siddique A. Abbasi, Pamela Ouyang, Michael Jerosch-Herold, Jingzhong Ding, Matthew J. Budoff, Venkatesh L. Murthy

[wysija_form id=”3″]

 

Venkatesh L. Murthy, MD, PhD, FACC, FASNC, & and Dr. Ravi Shah MD (2015). Evaluating Liver Fat With Cardiac CT Helps Predict Risk vs Benefit of Statin Therapy 

Last Updated on July 18, 2015 by Marie Benz MD FAAD