MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Robert J. Lewandowski, MD FSIR Associate Professor of Radiology Director of Interventional Oncology Department of Radiology Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Response: Retrievable inferior vena cava filters (rIVCF) were designed to provide temporary prevention from pulmonary embolism and then be removed when no longer needed. With permanent United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) indication, these devices now account for the majority of IVC filters placed. Most rIVCFs placed are never removed because of poor clinical follow up, failed retrieval procedures, or patients not being offered the opportunity for filter removal secondary to prolonged dwell time; the latter has previously been correlated with retrieval failure. Retrievable IVCFs appear to be subject to greater device related complications (e.g., filter penetration of the IVC, filter migration, filter fracture) relative to permanent devices; furthermore, the rates of these complications appear to increase with filter dwell time. This prompted the FDA to issue a 2010 safety alert urging removal of rIVCFs once they are deemed no longer necessary. In the present study, we sought to determine whether rIVCF dwell time affects technical success of the retrieval procedure. Over a six-year period, 648 retrieval procedures were performed at our institution, with filter dwell times ranging from 0-108 months. We found that filter dwell time did not negatively impact IVC filter retrieval success nor did it increase our adverse events from the retrieval procedure. With advanced, adjunctive IVC filter retrieval techniques, rIVCFs can be safely and reliably removed despite long dwell times. (more…)