[caption id="attachment_71691" align="alignleft" width="150"]

Alexa T. Diianni[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Alexa T. Diianni, MBS
Department of Medical Education
Geisinger College of Health Sciences
Scranton, PA 19409
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: During a previous study, my research team and I examined the financial conflicts of interest (COIs) between industry and academia- namely those that exist between authors of The American Psychiatric Association’s
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), and industry (1). The
DSM is a diagnostic tool widely used for the diagnosis of psychiatric disorders, and is thus of interest in assessing COIs (1,2). We previously found that authors of the
DSM-5-TR had received over $14.2m in undisclosed payments from industry (1). Our current study examines the gender and geographic disparities of the
DSM-5-TR authors, in relation to these payments.
While previous investigations have evaluated financial COIs in recent editions of the
DSM (3,4)
, the demographic information of its authors has not yet been examined. Equitable representation of
DSM authors is paramount as this manual serves a diverse population across the United States and beyond. It is important that the authorship of this manual be reflective of the population in which it serves, as there have been reported differences in both the type and prevalence of psychiatric care sought out by gender, as well as varying clinical treatment by geographic location (5-8).