03 Aug The Gap Between Injections and Surgery: A New Map for Knee Pain
That familiar, deep ache in your knee has returned. The relief from your last cortisone shot wore off faster this time, and the physical therapy exercises, while helpful, can't stop the grinding pain that limits your daily life. You might feel caught in a frustrating cycle, believing your only options are temporary fixes or a major joint replacement operation down the road.
This cycle can feel like a dead end. But the landscape for treating knee osteoarthritis pain is expanding. New approaches are focusing on the underlying inflammation that drives the pain, rather than just masking symptoms or replacing the joint entirely. Understanding these options is key to finding a path forward that aligns with your goals for activity and quality of life. For a broader overview of the minimally invasive approaches now bridging the gap between conservative care and surgery, see this overview of managing joint pain without surgery.
Quick answer: For moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis, newer minimally invasive procedures can target the specific inflammation causing your pain. This offers a potential middle ground between temporary injections and total knee replacement surgery, often with a much shorter recovery period.
What's inside:
- Why Standard Knee OA Treatments Sometimes Fall Short
- Understanding Inflammation's Role in Chronic Pain
- What is Genicular Artery Embolization (GAE)?
- Comparing GAE to Knee Replacement Surgery
- Who is a Candidate for a Minimally Invasive Approach?
- Critical Questions to Ask Your Doctor Before Deciding
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya:[/caption]
Dr. LaMoreaux[/caption]
Brian LaMoreaux, MD, MS
Internist and Rheumatologist
Executive Medical Director, Amgen
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? How does KRYSTEXXA® (pegloticase) work in gout?
Response: Many other diseases in gout have well-defined definitions of remission, but gout has lagged behind on this. With systemic consequences of gout becoming more apparent, the concept of treating gout to remission is increasing important to improving patient care and preserving patient health.
Dr. Nowell[/caption]
W. Benjamin Nowell PhD
Director of Patient-Centered Research at Global Healthy Living Foundation
Columbia University in the City of New York
Dr. Connelly[/caption]
Stephen Connelly, PhD
Co-founder & Chief Scientific Officer
Kelly Gavigan[/caption]
Kelly Gavigan, MPH
Manager, Research and Data Science
Ruth Fernandez-Ruiz, MD
Post-Doctoral Fellow
Department of Rheumatology
NYU Langone Heath
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) represent a unique population in considering risk for COVID-19 with biologic, genetic, demographic, clinical and treatment issues at play. By the nature of their chronic inflammatory autoimmune condition, the presence of comorbidities, and regular use of immunosuppressants, these individuals would traditionally be considered at high risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 and possibly having worse outcomes from the viral infection.
However, it might be speculated that inherently elevated type I Interferon, characteristic of the majority of patients with SLE, confers a protective effect as a first line anti-viral defense. Additionally, hydroxychloroquine, which was suggested as a potential therapeutic agent for COVID-19 early on, is used in most patients with SLE. Accordingly, we initiated this study to provide critical data needed to address the frequency and severity of COVID-19 in patients with SLE.