Multikinase Inhibitor Midostaurin Improved Symptoms and Survival in Most Advanced Forms of Blood Cancer Mastocytosis Interview with:

Jason R. Gotlib, MD The Clinical Investigator Pathway Hematology Division at Stanford University Medical Cent

Dr. Jason R. Gotlib

Jason R. Gotlib, MD
The Clinical Investigator Pathway
Hematology Division
Stanford University Medical Center What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?

Response: The background is that advanced forms of systemic mastocytosis, which are blood cancers characterized by accumulation of abnormal mast cells in the bone marrow and additional organs, represent a group of orphan diseases with a large unmet need. Approximately 90% of patients harbor the acquired KIT D816V mutation, a mutated receptor tyrosine kinase on the surface of mast cells which a primary driver of disease pathogenesis. Only 1 drug is approved for patients with one form of advanced systemic mastocytosis, termed ‘aggressive systemic mastocytosis, or ‘ASM’. This therapy is imatinib (Gleevec), but it is only approved for patients without the KIT D816V mutation, or with KIT mutation status unknown because the KIT D816V mutation is resistant to imatinib. Therefore, this drug may only be useful for approximately 10% of patients. Other drugs that have been used off-label for systemic mastocytosis (but are not approved for this indication) include interferon-alpha or cladribine, which show some activity, but their evaluation to date has been primarily limited to small case series which are usually retrospective in nature, and include mixed populations of systemic mastocytosis patients who have both early stage disease without organ damage (e.g. indolent systemic mastocytosis) and and advanced stage patients, as included in this trial, who have one or more findings of organ damage. Also, those trials employed differing response criteria and no central adjudication of eligibility and response assessments was undertaken.

Midostaurin is a multikinase inhibitor with activity against both wild-type KIT, but most importantly, KIT D816V (in contrast to imatinib). Prior work demonstrated that cell lines transformed with the KIT D816V mutation can be inhibited at relatively low concentrations of midostaurin. These concentrations could also be achieved in vivo (e.g. at concentrations achievable in the blood of patients). Cell lines transformed by KIT D816V could not be inhibited by imatinib. What are the main findings?

Response: Based on these cell line data, we subsequently, we treated a patient with very advanced mast cell leukemia who was near death with midostaurin on a compassionate use basis in 2005. The patient had an encouraging partial response with improvement of liver organ damage and percentage of mast cells in the blood, and significant improvement of improvement in performance status (Gotlib et al, Blood 2005). The response lasted for a few months. These findings led us to conduct an investigator-initiated trial at Stanford with additional sites at Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Washington University in St. Louis. This trial of 26 patients with advanced systemic mastocytosis demonstrated an overall response rate of 69% in eliciting partial or complete resolution of organ damage related to mast cell disease. We also saw significant reductions in the percentage of mast cells in the bone marrow, and serum tryptase levels, a blood test which is a surrogate marker of mast cell disease burden. Together, these promising pre-clinical and clinical findings led us to conduct the current international trial of midostaurin in patients with advanced systemic mastocytosis. The current trial is the largest and longest running prospective trial of any treatment in advanced systemic mastocytosis, and the first to have a central study steering committee that adjudicated patients eligibility, histopathology, and response assessments. What should readers take away from your report?

Response: In patients with advanced systemic mastocytosis, morbidity stems from two issues:

  • 1) mast cell degranulation (release of biologically active molecules such as histamine) which can lead to ‘mediator’ symptoms such as flushing, diarrhea, itching, abdominal pain, and sometimes anaphylaxis (these symptoms can occur in all forms of mastocytosis, e.g. indolent and advanced disease); and
  • 2) infiltration of organs by neoplastic mast cells causing organ damage. Organ damage is one of the defining features of advanced  systemic mastocytosis and the presence of mastocytosis-related organ damage was a requirement for this current trial. It is felt that the clinical benefits of midostaurin relate to its combined inhibitory effects on the proliferation of neoplastic mast cells and mediator release.

The major ‘take aways’ from the report are the following:
1) Complete or partial resolution of organ damage: midostaurin was able to produce complete or partial resolution of organ damage in 60% of patients.

Examples of improvement in organ damage included:

  • improvement of transfusion-dependent and non-transfusion dependent anemia and thrombocytopenia (low platelet counts);
  • improvement of liver function tests; and
  • improvement of weight loss.

In addition, among 39 patients who had post-baseline assessments of spleen volume by CT or MRI, 30 (77%) had reductions in the size of the spleen. Increased spleen size (referred to as splenomegaly) is a common feature feature of advanced SM that often causes abdominal discomfort, decreased appetite, and weight loss. Also, responses were durable: the median duration of response was slightly more than 2 years.

2) Objective decreases in the burden of mast cell disease in patients treated with midostaurin: the median best percentage decreases in mast cells in the bone marrow and serum tryptase levels (a blood marker of mast cell disease burden) were -59% and -58%, respectively. Decreases in bone marrow mast cell burden or serum tryptase level were observed in 78% of patients. Please refer to the report with more detailed analyses of the effects of midostaurin on decreases in the percentage of bone marrow mast cells and serum tryptase levels.

3) Midostaurin showed clinical activity in the most advanced form of systemic mastocytosis, mast cell leukemia. 8 of 16 (50%) patients with this highly fatal variant of SM responded. Historically, the survival of such patients is typically less than 6 months. The median survival of all mast cell leukemia patients was 9.4 months, and the median overall survival of responders had not been reached by the time of trial data cutoff date.

4) Improvement in symptoms and quality of life. Patient-reported outcome instruments evaluating symptoms and quality of life were incorporated into the study. With the exception of nausea and vomiting (known side effects associated with the tolerability profile of the drug), patients reported improvement in 30 of 32 symptoms with midostaurin compared to their baseline symptom scores.

5) Post-hoc analysis showing longer survival in responders vs. non-responders. In a post hoc multivariate analysis, longer survival was associated with response to midostaurin vs. no response, as well as a > 50% decrease in the percentage of bone marrow mast cells with midostaurin therapy compared to <50% decrease of bone marrow mast cells.

6) Side effects. The major side effects of midostaurin are low-grade gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. These were usually manageable when anti-nausea medicines were given, and when midostaurin was administered with meals. What recommendations do you have for future research as a result of this study?

Response: This study provides a proof of principle of the activity of midostaurin in advanced  systemic mastocytosis. It also validates the principle that inhibition of KIT D816V, a major driver of disease pathogenesis, is a viable therapeutic strategy in SM. However, since midostaurin is a multikinase inhibitor, other mechanisms of action cannot be ruled out. Future research should be aimed at evaluating midostaurin in earlier stage disease, that is, in indolent systemic mastocytosis patients who have refractory mediator symptoms not responsive to treatments such as antihistamines, leukotriene antagonists, mast cell stabilizers, or other anti-mediator therapies. Although such patients do not have organ damage, their symptom burden can be very high. Midostaurin demonstrated in the current study that it is very effective in mitigating mast cell disease symptoms and improving quality of life. Dr. Hanneke Kluin-Nelemans of the Netherlands has initiated such a study. In advanced systemic mastocytosis, combining midostaurin with agents with activity in SM, such as cladribine, merit evaluation. Also, it will be important to evaluate midostaurin in the pre- and post- stem cell transplantation setting to improve response rates and long-term survival. Thank you for your contribution to the community.

Citation: Efficacy and Safety of Midostaurin in Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis

Jason Gotlib, M.D., Hanneke C. Kluin-Nelemans, M.D., Ph.D., Tracy I. George, M.D., Cem Akin, M.D., Ph.D., Karl Sotlar, M.D., Olivier Hermine, M.D., Ph.D., Farrukh T. Awan, M.D., Elizabeth Hexner, M.D., Michael J. Mauro, M.D., David W. Sternberg, M.D., Ph.D., Matthieu Villeneuve, M.Sc., Alice Huntsman Labed, Ph.D., Eric J. Stanek, Pharm.D., Karin Hartmann, M.D., Hans-Peter Horny, M.D., Peter Valent, M.D., and Andreas Reiter, M.D.

N Engl J Med 2016; 374:2530-2541 June 30, 2016

Note: Content is Not intended as medical advice. Please consult your health care provider regarding your specific medical condition and questions.

More Medical Research Interviews on

[wysija_form id=”5″]

Last Updated on June 29, 2016 by Marie Benz MD FAAD