Research Into Many Dermatology Disorders Underfunded

MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Chante Karimkhani MD
Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York,
Erika Hagstrom MD
Loyola University of Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois
Robert Dellavalle MD, PhD, MPH
Department of Dermatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado; Dermatology Service, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, Colorado; Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado

MedicalResearch: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?

Response: Allocation of funding dollars to research is a critical and daunting task. While many factors may impact research-funding decisions, establishing a transparent priority-setting exercise is paramount. This is particularly important for the National Institutes of Health, which invests over $30 billion for medical research each year.

Diseases that have the greatest impact on our population warrant increased research dollars to reduce disease burden. The Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) is an epidemiological effort to quantify the global burden of disease in a universal metric called disability-adjusted life years (DALYs).

Focusing on our particular interest of dermatology, we investigated the 2012-2013 NIH funding for 15 skin diseases and matched this to corresponding DALY metrics. Our results demonstrated that melanoma, non-melanoma skin cancer, and leprosy were over-funded by the NIH according to DALY metrics.

In contrast, dermatitis, acne vulgaris, pruritus, urticaria, decubitus ulcer, fungal skin diseases, alopecia areata, cellulitis, and scabies appeared under-funded. Three skin diseases, bacterial skin diseases, viral skin diseases, and psoriasis, were well-matched in terms of NIH funding and disease burden. Disease burden is one of a myriad of factors that may impact funding priorities.

MedicalResearch: What future research do you recommend as a result of this work?

Response: We hope that our investigation demonstrates the usefulness of high-quality disease burden metrics to inform priority-setting decisions for any funding center.

Citation:

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Jun 4. pii: S0190-9622(15)01610-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.04.039. [Epub ahead of print]

Comparing cutaneous research funded by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) with the US skin disease burden.

Hagstrom EL1, Patel S2, Karimkhani C3, Boyers LN4, Williams HC5, Hay RJ6, Weinstock MA7, Armstrong AW8, Dunnick CA9, Margolis DJ10, Dellavalle RP11

[wysija_form id=”3″]

MedicalResearch.com Interview with:, Chante Karimkhani MD, & Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York (2015). Research Into Many Dermatology Disorders Underfunded

Last Updated on June 10, 2015 by Marie Benz MD FAAD

Tags: