Author Interviews, Heart Disease, NEJM / 06.10.2025
NEJM: AQUATIC Study Evaluates Risks/Benefits of Aspirin With On Oral Anticoagulation In Chronic Coronary Syndrome
Aspirin in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome Receiving Oral Anticoagulation
MedicalResearch.com Interview with: [caption id="attachment_70865" align="alignleft" width="200"]
Prof. Lemesle[/caption]
Gilles Lemesle, M.D., Ph.D
Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
Guillaume Cayla, M.D., Ph.D
Université de Montpellier, France
Martine Gilard, M.D., Ph.D
Hospital Cavale Blanche, Brest, France
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) and receiving long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC), mainly but not solely for atrial fibrillation, are at high risk of both atherothrombotic events on one side and bleeding events on the other side.
Therefore, the optimal antithrombotic management for these patients with CCS requiring OAC after stenting is critical, especially in those patients at high residual atherothrombotic risk.
Previous studies reported that in this specific context, the addition of antiplatelet therapy on top of OAC increases bleeding without a clear benefit on ischemic outcomes. Nevertheless, these studies presented several limitations, which restricted the applicability of their results in clinical pratice. They were indeed all open-labelled, included patients without stenting and/or at low atherothrombotic risk, and focused on Asian patients who have different atherothrombotic and bleeding risks as compared to Europeans.
Thus, the rationale of the AQUATIC trial comes from the need to better identify the optimal antithrombotic regimen in high-risk patients with CCS and previous stenting, who receive long-term OAC, in order to optimize the atherothrombotic/bleeding risks in this population. The AQUATIC trial analyzed the efficacy and safety of adding aspirin to OAC, a combination that is still commonly used for this high-risk population in clinical daily practice.
Dr. Tian[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Maoyi TIAN PhD
Program Head, Digital Health and Head, Injury & Trauma
Senior Research Fellow
The George Institute
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: There is clear evidence from the literature that sodium reduction or potassium supplementation can reduce blood pressure. Reduced blood pressure can also lead to a risk reduction for cardiovascular diseases.
Salt substitute is a reduced sodium added potassium product combined those effects. Previous research of salt substitute focus on the blood pressure outcome. There is no evidence if salt substitute can reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases or pre-mature death. This study provided a definitive evidence for this unaddressed question.
MedicalResearch.com: What are the main findings?
The main findings of the research were:
Dr. Raisi-Estabra[/caption]
Dr Zahra Raisi-Estabragh, PhD fellow
Cardiologist Trainee at Queen Mary University of London and
Barts Health NHS Trust
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Previous studies have linked greater consumption of red and processed meat to poorer clinical cardiovascular outcomes, for example, higher risk of having a heart attack or of dying from heart disease. However, the biological mechanisms underlying these relationships are not well understood. Furthermore, the impact of meat intake on more direct measures of heart health, such as, structure and function of the heart and blood vessels, has not been previously studied in large cohorts. Examining how meat intake may influence different aspects of cardiovascular health can help us better understand its health effects.