While anterior cervical discectomy surgery has become a widely accepted and frequently performed procedure to relieve spinal cord or nerve root compression, it is not without potential risks and complications. These can range from common surgical risks, such as infection, to more procedure-specific complications like nerve damage, dural tears, and the possibility of recurrent disc herniation. As there is a critical need for increased awareness and understanding of these challenges, it is essential to engage in a thorough exploration of the potential outcomes and their management tactics.
Understanding Anterior Cervical Discectomy
The anterior cervical discectomy is a surgical procedure that warrants comprehension due to its complex nature. This surgical technique involves the removal of an intervertebral disc or a portion of this disc from the neck area, specifically in the anterior cervical spine. It is typically performed to alleviate spinal cord or nerve root pressure, leading to considerable pain relief and functional improvement. The procedure is often paired with a fusion to stabilize the spine.The recovery timeline varies for each individual depending upon factors like age, overall health status, and the severity of the disc problem. However, the immediate postoperative recovery period typically lasts for a few hours to a few days, during which time patients are closely monitored. Subsequent recovery, involving physical therapy and gradual return to normal activities, can stretch from several weeks to a few months.Though the anterior cervical discectomy is generally regarded as a safe and effective procedure, it is not devoid of risks. Potential complications include infection, nerve damage, difficulties swallowing or speaking, and issues related to the graft or hardware used in fusion. The understanding of these risks is paramount for patients undergoing this procedure.(more…)
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Pravesh S. Gadjradj, MD
Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center,
University Neurosurgical Center Holland
Leiden, Netherlands
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?Response: Many healthcare professionals throughout the world face issues surrounding medical malpractice at some point in their careers. Unfortunately, a number of these cases turn into medical malpractice lawsuits. As a specialty that treats acute pathology and refractory pain, neurosurgery is at risk for high liability. By the means of a survey among members of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS), we aimed to illustrate how malpractice lawsuits affect neurosurgeons professionally, emotionally and financially.
MedicalResearch.com: What are the main findings?Response: Some 490 members of the CNS shared their experiences with us. Among these members, 81% faced a medical malpractice lawsuit. The main concerns expressed about being sued included losing confidence and practicing defensive medicine, personal assets being at risk, and being named in the National Practitioner Data Bank. Of the respondents, 40% stated they were frequently or always concerned about being sued, and 77 % stated their fear had led to a change in how they practice medicine. For 58 %, this change led to the practice of defensive medicine, while for others it led to more extensive documentation (14%) and/or to referring or dropping complex cases (12%). Given the medical malpractice environment, 59% of respondents considered referring complex patient cases, whereas 37% considered leaving the practice of medicine.
(more…)
MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Dr. Miikka Korja
Chief Innovation Officer
Neurosurgeon
Associate Professor of Neurosurgery
HUS, Helsinki University Hospital
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?Response: Helsinki University Hospital, one of the largest hospital organizations in industrialized countries, has a very long history in conducting studies on brain aneurysms and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. The one and only study on the natural history of ruptured aneurysms has also been conducted in Helsinki 50 years ago (published in 1967). The term “natural history” refers to an approach where the cause of a patient’s disease is not treated at all. In this case, it means that ruptured aneurysms in patients with devastating brain hemorrhage, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, were left untreated.
Therefore, these patients have a high risk of a rebleeding from the once ruptured aneurysm. As ruptured aneurysms are nowadays unexceptionally treated, if the patient survives the primary bleeding event, such natural history studies are impractical to conduct.
We wanted to update the 50 years old data by using a historical patient registry. Back in the old days, many of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients were not treated because for example surgery was considered too risky or patients were classified as too old for surgery. By using the historical data, we showed that aneurysmal SAH, if not treated, is even more devastating disease than believed. Based on our results, we can state that 75-89% of today’s patients die in a year without treatments.
(more…)
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Charles Tator, Neurosurgeon
Toronto Western Hospital and Director
Canadian Concussion CentreMedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: The main findings of this study are that the number of symptoms of post-concussion syndrome (PCS) are related to how long PCS lasts. Furthermore, physicians need to be more vigorous in their treatment of PCS symptoms and use the treatments that exist for each symptom where possible such as headache, vertigo, anxiety. The sooner sufferers of PCS receive treatment for their symptoms, the better.
(more…)
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Timothy R. Smith, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H.
Pituitary/Neuroendoscopy Fellow
Department of Neurosurgery
Brigham & Womens Hospital
Harvard University Boston, MA 0211
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?Dr. Smith: Defensive medicine is the practice of prescribing unnecessary medical treatment for fear of being sued – it is widely practiced in the United States and contributes to our rising healthcare costs. In high-risk specialties such as neurosurgery, the fear of litigation leads to defensive practices that actually impact clinical decisions. A 2009 American College of Emergency Physicians report created malpractice risk profiles for each state based on its legal atmosphere, tort reform, and insurance availability. Based on these profiles, each state was ranked from 1 to 50 and sorted into separate categories, ranging from A, for the best liability environment, to F, for the worst. We sent a 51-question, anonymous online survey, which covered topics ranging from patient characteristics to surgeon liability profiles, to board-certified US neurosurgeons in the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. The purpose was to determine how neurosurgeons’ perceptions of their medico-legal environments correlated with these established state risk profiles, as well as whether each state’s liability risk environment was a predictor of defensive medical practices.
We found that though the average malpractice insurance premium was $103,000 per year, neurosurgeons from high-risk states paid significantly more ($128,000) than those from low-risk states did ($75,000). Even with these amounts, almost 70% of respondents felt that their insurance coverage was inadequate, and 90% felt that the insurance premium was a financial burden. Neurosurgeons from high-risk states were also twice as likely to have been sued as those from low-risk states were. More than 80% of respondents ordered additional imaging for defensive medical purposes, and more than 75% said they ordered additional laboratory tests and made unnecessary referrals for defensive purposes; this behavior was more prevalent in high-risk states. After controlling for important confounders, we found that for every letter-grade change from “A” to “F”, neurosurgeons are 1.5 times more likely to engage in defensive behaviors. For example, moving from a “D” state to an “A” state represents 4.5 fold difference in defensive behaviors.
(more…)
MedicalResearch:com Interview with:Stephen Honeybul FDS RCS (Eng), FRCS (SN), FRACS
Consultant Neurosurgeon
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
HOD Royal Perth Hospital
Perth WA Australia
MedicalResearch: What are the main findings of this study? Dr. Honeybul: Amongst those patients who had been adjudged severely disabled or in a vegetative state at 18 months, remained as such at the three years follow up.
Most patients who were able to provide a response said that they would have provided consent to the "life saving" intervention even if they had known their final outcome
(more…)
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.AcceptRejectRead More
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.