Author Interviews, Heart Disease / 06.11.2023
Updated Classification of Acute MI Based on Stages of Tissue Injury Severity
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
[caption id="attachment_61006" align="alignleft" width="125"]
Dr. Gaba[/caption]
Prakriti Gaba, MD
Cardiovascular Medicine Fellow
Brigham and Women's Hospital
[caption id="attachment_31114" align="alignleft" width="120"]
Dr. Deepak Bhatt[/caption]
Deepak L. Bhatt MD MPH
Director of Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital
Dr. Valentin Fuster Professor of Cardiovascular Medicine
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Accurate classification of acute myocardial infarction is instrumental for the appropriate diagnosis and effective management of patients suffering from this widely prevalent cardiovascular condition.
In the past, there have been a variety of clinical scores published to advise clinicians on the best classifications schemes for patients with acute MI. These have included the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score, the HEART score, and the Killip classification. The strength of these traditional scores includes their practicality, as they can be implemented at the bedside to rapidly assist with prognostication. Nonetheless, as technologic advancements have made imaging and tissue identification more accessible, national and international committees are looking to revise traditional classification schemes of acute MI with novel ones leveraging multimodal approaches.
Dr. Gaba[/caption]
Prakriti Gaba, MD
Cardiovascular Medicine Fellow
Brigham and Women's Hospital
[caption id="attachment_31114" align="alignleft" width="120"]
Dr. Deepak Bhatt[/caption]
Deepak L. Bhatt MD MPH
Director of Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital
Dr. Valentin Fuster Professor of Cardiovascular Medicine
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Accurate classification of acute myocardial infarction is instrumental for the appropriate diagnosis and effective management of patients suffering from this widely prevalent cardiovascular condition.
In the past, there have been a variety of clinical scores published to advise clinicians on the best classifications schemes for patients with acute MI. These have included the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score, the HEART score, and the Killip classification. The strength of these traditional scores includes their practicality, as they can be implemented at the bedside to rapidly assist with prognostication. Nonetheless, as technologic advancements have made imaging and tissue identification more accessible, national and international committees are looking to revise traditional classification schemes of acute MI with novel ones leveraging multimodal approaches.
Dr. Yandrapalli[/caption]
Dr. Srikanth Yandrapalli
New York Medical College
NYMC · Cardiology
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Selection of coronary artery bypass grafting over percutaneous coronary intervention during an acute myocardial infarction is influenced by the extent of coronary artery disease and patient comorbidities. Prior studies have shown sex and racial differences in coronary artery diseaseburden.
We sought to identify if there are any sex and racial differences in the utilization of coronary artery bypass grafting over percutaneous coronary intervention during a revascularized first acute myocardial infarction in the US.
We found that males had a higher coronary artery bypass grafting rate than women, and compared to Whites, Blacks had lower coronary artery bypass grafting rate and Asians had higher coronary artery bypass grafting at the time of a first myocardial infarction.





