Sarah CM Roberts, DrPH Associate Professor ObGyn&RS Zuckerberg San Francisco General UCSF

Are Abortions Safer in Ambulatory Surgery Centers Than Medical Offices?

MedicalResearch.com Interview with:

Sarah CM Roberts, DrPH Associate Professor ObGyn&RS Zuckerberg San Francisco General UCSF

Dr. Roberts

Sarah CM Roberts, DrPH
Associate Professor
ObGyn&RS
Zuckerberg San Francisco General
UCSF

MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?

Response: Thirteen states have laws that require abortions to be provided in Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASCs); many of these laws apply only in the second trimester.  We examined outcomes from more than 50,000 abortions provided in two facility types:  Ambulatory Surgery Centers and office-based settings.

We found that there was no significant difference in abortion-related complications across facility type; in both settings, about 3.3% had any complication and about 0.3% had a major complication.  There also was no significant difference in complications across facility types for second trimester and later abortions.

MedicalResearch.com: What should readers take away from your report?

Response: There is no significant difference in abortion-related complications between abortions provided in Ambulatory Surgery Centers v. office-based settings. This finding is consistent with other research that has compared the safety of procedures across ASCs v. office-based settings. Thus, laws that require that abortions – including second trimester abortions – be provided in ASCs are not evidence-based.

MedicalResearch.com: What recommendations do you have for future research as a result of this work? 

Response: Future research should examine the costs associated with providing abortions in both Ambulatory Surgery Centers and office-based settings.

Disclosures: None of the authors have any disclosures to report.

Citation:

Roberts SCM, Upadhyay UD, Liu G, et al. Association of Facility Type With Procedural-Related Morbidities and Adverse Events Among Patients Undergoing Induced Abortions. JAMA. 2018;319(24):2497–2506. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.7675

[wysija_form id=”3″] 

The information on MedicalResearch.com is provided for educational purposes only, and is in no way intended to diagnose, cure, or treat any medical or other condition. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health and ask your doctor any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. In addition to all other limitations and disclaimers in this agreement, service provider and its third party providers disclaim any liability or loss in connection with the content provided on this website.

 

Last Updated on June 29, 2018 by Marie Benz MD FAAD