Kyle Sheetz, MD, MSc Research Fellow Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy University of Michigan

Surgical Volume Standards Not Practical For Most Hospitals

MedicalResearch.com Interview with:

Kyle Sheetz, MD, MSc Research Fellow Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy University of Michigan

Dr. Sheetz

Kyle Sheetz, MD, MSc
Research Fellow
Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy
University of Michigan

MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?

Response: Various patient safety organizations and clinical societies continue to advocate for volume thresholds as a means to improve the short-term safety and overall effectiveness of high risk cancer surgeries in the United States.

We asked two questions with this study:

1) What proportion of U.S. hospitals meet discretionary volume standards?

2) Do these standards differentiate hospitals based on short-term safety outcomes (mortality and complications)?

We found that a relatively low proportion of hospitals meet even modest volume standards put forth by the Leapfrog Group. These standards did not differentiate hospitals based on outcomes for 3 of 4 high risk cancer operations reported by the Leapfrog Group. However, using higher thresholds, we were able to demonstrate a significant relationship between higher hospital volume and better outcomes, which has been reported numerous times.

MedicalResearch.com: What should readers take away from your report?

Response: The goal of this study is to highlight the tradeoffs associated with volume standards. There is an important tradeoff between patient safety and volume standards that are not practically achievable by most hospitals, thus limiting their relevance. While the volume-outcome relationship remains, care overall has gotten safer – due to many factors.

MedicalResearch.com: What recommendations do you have for future research as a result of this work?

Response: For certain procedures, short-term safety may not be the most important outcome for patient advocacy groups or clinical societies to prioritize. There may be greater benefits from shifting the focus towards outcomes like long-term survival after high risk cancer surgery, guideline concordant care, or even patient-reported outcome measures. 

No disclosures

Citation:

Sheetz KH, Chhabra KR, Smith ME, Dimick JB, Nathan H. Association of Discretionary Hospital Volume Standards for High-risk Cancer Surgery With Patient Outcomes and Access, 2005-2016. JAMA Surg. Published online August 14, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.3017

  

Subscribe box:

JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST

We respect your privacy and will never share your details.

 

Last Modified:

Last Modified : Aug 15, 2019 @ 2:15 pm

 

 

 

The information on MedicalResearch.com is provided for educational purposes only, and is in no way intended to diagnose, cure, or treat any medical or other condition. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health and ask your doctor any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. In addition to all other limitations and disclaimers in this agreement, service provider and its third party providers disclaim any liability or loss in connection with the content provided on this website.

 

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.