Addiction, addiction-treatment, Author Interviews, Opiods / 13.10.2025
New Geisinger Study finds steep decline in hydromorphone use in America over the last decade
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Krisha S. Patel
Center For Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes
Geisinger College Health Sciences
Scranton, PA
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Hydromorphone is a powerful opioid medication approved for treating moderate to severe acute pain, as well as chronic pain that doesn’t respond to other treatments. One brand name is Dilaudid. It is much more potent than morphine, about 5 to 10 times stronger, and crosses the blood-brain barrier more efficiently. Hydromorphone comes in several forms, including oral powders, solutions, immediate- and extended-release tablets, and injectable options like intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous.
Like morphine, hydromorphone primarily targets the mu-opioid receptors, with some activity at delta receptors. Its higher fat solubility gives it a faster onset of action than morphine, though not as rapid as fentanyl. Due to its potency and risk for misuse and overdose, hydromorphone is typically prescribed only when other pain management options have failed. According to the RADARS StreetRx Program, in 2023, the black-market value of a 1 mg immediate-release tablet was about $15,000 annually, with extended-release tablets reaching $62,000 for a full-years supply.
While previous studies have explored regional differences in the use of opioids like morphine, oxycodone, and codeine, hydromorphone has not been examined. This study aims to fill that gap by analyzing state-level and temporal trends in hydromorphone use across the US from 2010 to 2023. It draws on data from three major sources: the Drug Enforcement Administration’s Automated Reports and Consolidated Orders System (ARCOS), Medicaid, and Medicare Part D. By comparing these datasets, this report also explores how hydromorphone distribution and prescribing patterns have evolved over time.
(more…)
Elena Stains
Medical Student
Department of Medical Education
Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine
Scranton, PA
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Opioid use has been an increasing problem since the early 2000s in the United States (US) with a surge around 2010. Twenty-five percent of those having abused pain relievers in 2013 and 2014 got those drugs from physicians1. Physicians are particularly well-known for fueling the opioid crisis in Florida in the 2000s. Of the United States’ top 100 opioid prescribing physicians in 2010, an astounding 98 were prescribing in Florida2. Florida taking the main stage of the opioid crisis can be attributed to several factors, including ability of physicians to dispense opioids directly from their offices to patients (i.e. without pharmacists) and the presence of many infamous “pill mills” in the state3–6.
The researchers at Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine aimed to analyze the amount of hydrocodone (including brand names of Vicodin and Lortab) and oxycodone (OxyContin and Percocet) distributed in Florida from 2006 to 2021, paying close attention to the peak year of the opioid crisis, 2010. The team used the Washington Post and the US Drug Enforcement Administration’s Automation of Reports and Consolidated Orders System (ARCOS) databases to compile this compelling information.
Lauren C. Davis, MBS
Department of Medical Education
Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine
Scranton, PA 19409
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Financial conflicts of interest (COIs) resulting from ties between academia and industry have been under scrutiny for their potential to hinder the integrity of medical research. COIs can lead to implicit bias, compromise the research process, and erode public trust (1-6). The American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), standardizes symptom criteria and codifies psychiatric disorders. This manual contributes to the approval of new drugs, extensions of patent exclusivity, and can influence payers and mental health professionals seeking third-party reimbursements. Given the implications of the DSM on public health, it is paramount that it is free of industry influence. Previous research has shown a high prevalence of industry ties among panel and task force members of the DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5, despite the implementation of a disclosure policy for the DSM-5 (7,8). This study (9) determined the extent and type of COIs received by panel and task-force members of the DSM-5-TR (2022) (10). As the DSM-5-TR did not disclose COI, we used the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments (OP) database (11) to quantify them.