Author Interviews, Leukemia, Race/Ethnic Diversity, Stanford / 14.12.2015
Disparities in Acute Leukemia Care are Multifactorial
[caption id="attachment_20079" align="alignleft" width="118"]
Dr. Manali Patel[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Manali Patel, MD, MPH
Instructor in the Division of Oncology
Department of Medicine
Stanford University School of Medicine
Researcher at the Clinical Excellence Research Center and the Primary Care and Outcomes Research Group at Stanford
Staff oncologist at the Veterans Administration and a researcher in the Palo Alto Veterans Administration Health Services & Research Development group.
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Patel: Racial and ethnic disparities in Acute Leukemia are well documented in the literature but the reasons underlying the disparities remain largely unknown. In our previous work, we demonstrated mortality disparities for minorities with Acute Myeloid Leukemia despite favorable prognostic demographic and molecular factors. We have also shown that differences in receipt of treatment may partially explain a large component of these disparities. The purpose of this study is to determine how socioeconomic status factors influence mortality from Acute Leukemia using a population-based novel linked dataset of the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Database and the National Longitudinal Mortality Study.
Medical Research: What are the main findings?
Dr. Patel: We found a total of 121 patients with Acute Lymphoid Leukemia and 438 patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the linked dataset. After adjusting for socioeconomic status factors, there were increased risk of mortality among Hispanic and decreased risk of mortality among Asian Pacific Islander patients as compared with non-Hispanic white patients in Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia. Among patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, we found no associations of mortality by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.
Dr. Manali Patel[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Manali Patel, MD, MPH
Instructor in the Division of Oncology
Department of Medicine
Stanford University School of Medicine
Researcher at the Clinical Excellence Research Center and the Primary Care and Outcomes Research Group at Stanford
Staff oncologist at the Veterans Administration and a researcher in the Palo Alto Veterans Administration Health Services & Research Development group.
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Patel: Racial and ethnic disparities in Acute Leukemia are well documented in the literature but the reasons underlying the disparities remain largely unknown. In our previous work, we demonstrated mortality disparities for minorities with Acute Myeloid Leukemia despite favorable prognostic demographic and molecular factors. We have also shown that differences in receipt of treatment may partially explain a large component of these disparities. The purpose of this study is to determine how socioeconomic status factors influence mortality from Acute Leukemia using a population-based novel linked dataset of the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Database and the National Longitudinal Mortality Study.
Medical Research: What are the main findings?
Dr. Patel: We found a total of 121 patients with Acute Lymphoid Leukemia and 438 patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the linked dataset. After adjusting for socioeconomic status factors, there were increased risk of mortality among Hispanic and decreased risk of mortality among Asian Pacific Islander patients as compared with non-Hispanic white patients in Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia. Among patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, we found no associations of mortality by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.
Dr. Röllig[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Christoph Röllig
Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I
Universitätsklinikum der Technischen Universitä
Dresden, Germany
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Röllig: When this trial began in 2009, standard treatment for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) consisted of a combination of cytarabine plus anthracyclin/anthracendion and the need for improvement was obvious in the light of only around 50% long-term survivors even amongst younger patients. Although a promising approach, the use of kinase inhibitors in AML had not been shown to be beneficial and was not widely used. Sorafenib had been shown to be tolerable as single agent and in combination with commonly used chemotherapeutic agents. The results of the trial show that the addition of sorafenib to standard chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AML patients up to the age of 60 years is associated with significant prolongation of event-free survival and relapse-free survival compared to placebo plus standard chemotherapy. That means that patient who took sorafenib had less AML relapses.
To our knowledge, this is the first randomized-controlled showing that integrating a kinase inhibitor into standard intensive chemotherapy of younger patients with AML is associated with significant improvement of relapse-free survival, with no increase in treatment-related mortality. After a decade of evaluating the potential of kinase inhibitors in 





