Dr. Deepa Patadia[/caption]
Deepa Patadia, MD
Wexner Medical Center
The Ohio State University
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Influenza vaccination is recommended every autumn for all children 6 months of age and older. It is particularly important for children with asthma, who are at high risk of hospitalization or severe illness if they contract influenza infection. The rates of influenza vaccination in children with asthma have not previously been well studied, but Healthy People 2020 has set a target goal to vaccinate 70% of all children for influenza. We found that rates of vaccination in our large primary care population was much lower than the target rate, with less than 50% of all children receiving the vaccine each year over a 5 year period; however rates were higher in children with asthma, albeit still only at 55%.
Dr. Mark Loeb[/caption]
Dr. Mark Loeb
BSc (McGill), MD (McGill), MSc (McMaster), FRCPC
Professor, Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine
Joint Member, Dept of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Division Director, Infectious Diseases, McMaster University
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: The background for this study is that in the U.S, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the committee that advises the CDC on vaccination policy, decided this June not to recommend LAIV (nasal live vaccine) for children. This is because of non-randomized studies conducted in the U.S suggesting that the vaccine was ineffective. This was an unprecedented decision in influenza vaccine policy making for children.
Our study, a randomized, blinded, controlled trial, which is the most rigorous type of study design, conducted over 3 years (2012-13, 2013-2014, 2014-2015 influenza seasons), showed in fact very similar protection for children and their communities for the live and inactivated vaccines. We conducted the study in the Hutterite community of Western Canada which allowed us to compare the effect of the vaccines in entire communities. That is, we were able to study the direct effect and the indirect effect of these vaccines.
Dr. Marta Nunes[/caption]
Marta C. Nunes, PhD
DST/NRF:Vaccine Preventable Diseases
Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit
University of Witwatersrand
Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital
Soweto, South Africa
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Young infants are at increased risk for influenza infection and hospitalizations associated with influenza infection. While active annual influenza vaccination is the most efficient mode for the prevention of influenza infection, current vaccines are poorly immunogenic and not licensed for use in infants
Dr. Julie Shakib[/caption]
Julie H. Shakib, DO, MS, MPH
Assistant Professor of Pediatrics | University of Utah
Medical Director | Well Baby and Intermediate Nursery
Salt Lake City
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Shakib: Immunization against influenza in the first six months of life is ineffective due to an immature immune response. Passive protection via maternal immunization offers an alternative but only a few studies have evaluated the efficacy of this immunization strategy. We found that in infants born to women immunized against influenza during pregnancy, the risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza and influenza-related hospitalization were reduced by 70% and 81% in their first 6 months of life, respectively.This large study provides more evidence that when women are immunized against influenza during pregnancy, their infants are much less likely to be diagnosed with influenza in their first 6 months.
Dr. Anna Phillips[/caption]
Dr Anna C. Phillips PhD CPsychol AFBPsS
Reader in Behavioural Medicine
School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences
University of Birmingham
Edgbaston Birmingham
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Phillips: We know that various factors can affect the response to vaccination and that older adults have a poorer response than younger people, i.e. they produce fewer antibodies. We also know that many immune messengers and important hormones have daily rhythms in their levels and wanted to test whether the antibody response to vaccination might also be affected by time of day. We randomised surgeries to giving morning or afternoon vaccinations and tested before and one month after the vaccination for levels of antibodies.
Two of the three flu strains (viruses) contained in the vaccine showed a higher antibody response in the morning than in the afternoon, up to 4 x higher to one of the strains (A/California) and 1.5 x higher to the B strain. None of the potential mechanisms we measured (immune messengers, hormones) seemed to be driving this effect.
Dr. Sarah Tartoff[/caption]
Sara Y. Tartof, PhD, MPH
Kaiser Permanente Southern California Department of Research & Evaluation
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Tartof: The flu is a highly contagious respiratory infection that can cause serious complications, hospitalizations and, in some cases, even death. Some people, such as older adults, young children and people with certain health conditions, are at high risk for serious complications. In addition to recommending annual flu vaccination for people 6 months of age and older, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that hospitalized patients who are eligible receive the flu vaccine before discharge.
Historically, inpatient rates of vaccination have been low. There has been concern among surgeons that vaccinating patients while they are in the hospital can contribute to increased risk of vaccine-related fever or muscle pain, which might be incorrectly attributed to surgical complications. However, there have been no data to support that concern. The objective of this study was to provide clinical evidence that would either substantiate or refute concerns about the safety of perioperative vaccination.
Dr. Ikwo Oboho[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Ikwo Oboho, MD, ScMLCDR
United States Public Health Service
Medical Epidemiologist, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionPriority Populations Treatment Team| HIV Care & Treatment Branch | Division of Global HIV/TB
Atlanta, GA 30333
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Oboho: ·Pregnant women with flu are at high risk of serious illness and complications, including death.
The study is based on data gathered from a nationwide flu surveillance network that includes 14 states. The analysis focused on pregnant women hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed flu over four recent flu seasons, from 2010 to 2014.
MedicalResearch.com: What are the main findings?
Dr. Oboho: · During the study period, 865 pregnant women were hospitalized with flu. Sixty-three of these patients, or about 7 percent, had severe illness.
Dr. Schulert[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview
Grant S Schulert MD, PhD
Clinical Fellow, Division of Rheumatology
Cincinnati Childrens Hospital
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Schulert: Influenza infection causes millions of illnesses annually, but most of those are relatively mild. In a subset of cases, patients can become critically ill, even if they are relatively young and healthy. Several previous reports had observed in these critically ill patients features of a hyperinflammatory syndrome known as HLH (hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis) or MAS (macrophage activation syndrome). This hyperinflammation can be triggered by other infections as well as in a subtype of juvenile arthritis, but there is also a familial form occurring in early childhood with known genetic causes. Our questions with this study were
1) how often are features consistent with HLH/MAS seen in fatal H1N1 influenza infections and
2) do patients with fatal H1N1 infection have genetic mutations associated with HLH/MAS?
Our collaborator Paul Harms, MD, and his team at the Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan Medical School identified 16 cases of fatal H1N1 influenza infection. Based on their clinical features, between 41-88% of these patients could be categorized as having a hyperinflammatory HLH/MAS. We then used processed tissue samples from the patients for whole exome genetic sequencing, which reads the entire genetic code of every gene in a person. Five patients carried mutations in genes which cause HLH, and several others carried mutations in genes linked to MAS. This suggests that there may be genetic risk factors for developing fatal hyperinflammatory syndromes in H1N1 infection.
Carla L. Black PhD
Immunization Services Division
National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases
CDC
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Black: The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends that all health-care personnel (HCP) be vaccinated annually against influenza. Vaccination of health-care personnel can reduce influenza-related morbidity and mortality among HCP and their patients. Overall, 77.3% of HCP reported receiving an influenza vaccination in the 2014-15 season, similar to the 75.2% coverage among HCP reported in the 2013-14 season. Coverage was highest among health-care personnel working in hospitals (90.4%) and lowest among HCP working in long-term care (LTC) settings (63.9%).
Flu vaccination coverage was highest in settings with employer flu vaccination requirements and promotion of flu vaccination. Vaccination coverage was 96% among HCP with an employer requirement for vaccination. Among HCP without an employer requirement for vaccination, vaccination coverage was higher for HCP working in settings where vaccination was offered on-site at no cost for one day (73.6%) or multiple days (83.9%) compared with health-care personnel working in settings where vaccination was promoted but not offered on-site (59.5%) or not promoted in any manner (44.0%).
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr Richard Forshee PhD
Associate Director for Research in the Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Silver Spring, MD
On behalf of the study authors
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Forshee: Influenza continues to be a major public health concern causing illness, hospitalization, and death. The elderly are at highest risk for seasonal influenza complications, including hospitalization and death. As people grow older their ability to raise a strong protective immune response can weaken. The availability of a vaccine that uses a higher dose to induce a stronger immune response could reduce the serious impact of influenza in this age group. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine was more effective for prevention of probable influenza infections and influenza-related hospital admissions, compared to standard-dose inactivated influenza recipients.
In December 2009, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) licensed Fluzone High Dose, an injectable inactivated trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine for people ages 65 years and older. This high-dose vaccine contains four times more hemagglutinin—the active ingredient in influenza vaccines that cause the human body to produce antibodies against the influenza viruses—than the standard-dose vaccine. The FDA approved the high-dose vaccine using the accelerated approval regulatory pathway, which allows the agency to approve products for serious or life-threatening diseases based on reasonable evidence of a product’s effectiveness. This pathway reduces the time it takes for needed medical products to become available to the public. Studies conducted prior to licensure showed an enhanced immune response to the high-dose vaccine compared with the standard-dose vaccine in individuals 65 years of age and older indicating that the high-dose vaccine was reasonably likely to be more effective in preventing influenza disease.
As part of the accelerated approval process, the manufacturer, Sanofi Pasteur, was required to conduct a randomized clinical study post-licensure to confirm that the high-dose vaccine decreased seasonal influenza disease after vaccination relative to standard dose vaccine. This confirmatory study demonstrated that the high–dose vaccine prevented 24% more cases of laboratory-confirmed influenza illness compared to standard-dose vaccines in people 65 years of age and older. However, the study was not large enough to determine efficacy of the vaccine against severe disease.
A team of scientists from FDA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Acumen LLC ( an independent research organization) studied the relative effectiveness of the high-dose influenza vaccine in the U.S. population ages 65 years and older. The observational study, which covered the 2012-2013 influenza season, found a significant reduction both in influenza-associated illness and in influenza-related hospitalizations among individuals who received the high-dose vaccine, compared to those receiving the standard dose.
Additional background about this study: “Comparative effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines in US residents aged 65 years and older from 2012 to 2013 using Medicare data: a retrospective cohort analysis” is available at:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71087-4
A commentary on the study titled “Novel observational study designs with new influenza vaccines” is available at:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(15)70020-4
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Melissa Stockwell, MD, MPH, FAAP
Florence Irving Assistant Professor of Pediatrics and Population and Family Health, Columbia University - College of Physicians & Surgeons and Mailman School of Public Health
Medical Director, New York-Presbyterian Hospital Immunization Registry (EzVac);
Co-Director, Primary Care Clinician Research Fellowship in Community Health
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Influenza can be a very serious disease and is more than just a bad cold. Some children who are 6 months through 8 years need two doses of the influenza vaccine in a season depending on if and when they received previous influenza vaccine doses. We know that only about half of these families who want to vaccinate their children against the flu and get the first dose, come back to get the second dose.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with
Scott E. Hensley, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor, The Wistar Institute
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Medical Research: What are the main findings of the study?
Dr. Hensley: We found that H1N1 viruses recently acquired a mutation that abrogates binding of influenza antibodies that are present in a large number of middle-aged adults. We propose that this mutation lead to increased disease among middle-aged adults during the 2013-2014 influenza season.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Robert B Belshe, MD
Division of Infectious Diseases, Allergy & Immunology
Saint Louis University School of Medicine
Medical Research: What are the main findings of the study?
Response: A vaccine that protects against an old strain of avian flu primes the immune system to mount a rapid response when a vaccine designed to protect against a related but different and new strain of avian flu is given a year later, according to Saint Louis University research findings reported in JAMA.
In addition, when combined with an adjuvant, which is a chemical that stimulates the immune system to produce more antibodies, a lower dose of the new avian flu vaccine worked better in triggering an immune response than a stronger dose without adjuvant. That means the amount of vaccine against a new strain of bird flu can be stretched to protect more people if an adjuvant is added.
Both findings represent important strategies researchers can continue to study to fight new strains of bird flu that people previously have not been exposed to, and consequently can rapidly turn into a pandemic outbreak and public health emergency, said Robert Belshe, M.D., professor of infectious diseases, allergy and immunology at Saint Louis University and the lead author of the article, which appeared in the Oct. 8, 2014 issue of JAMA.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
David P. Greenberg, M.D.
Vice President, Scientific & Medical Affairs, and Chief Medical Officer
Sanofi Pasteur US.
Medical Research: What are the main findings of the study?
Dr. Greenberg: The New England Journal of Medicine published positive results from a randomized, double-blind, large-scale, multi-center efficacy trial, which found that Fluzone® High-Dose (Influenza Vaccine) was more efficacious in preventing influenza illness (“the flu”) in adults 65 years of age and older compared to standard-dose Fluzone vaccine. Fluzone High-Dose vaccine was found to be 24.2 percent (95% CI, 9.7 to 36.5) more effective in preventing influenza relative to standard-dose Fluzone vaccine for the primary endpoint (laboratory-confirmed influenza associated with typical clinical symptoms occurring at least 14 days post-vaccination caused by any viral type or subtype). In other words, investigators determined that participants in the Fluzone High-Dose vaccine group were less likely to get the flu than those in the standard-dose Fluzone vaccine group. The study safety data were consistent with previous Fluzone High-Dose vaccine studies.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Philip M. Polgreen, MD, MPH.
Associate Professor of Internal Medicine - Infectious Diseases
University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine
MedicalResearch.com: What are the main findings of the study?
Dr. Polgreen: In this paper, to determine if well-child visits are associated with increased risk for subsequent influenza-like-illness visits, we used a large database that tracks healthcare expenditures of families over time. Controlling for other factors such as the presence of other children, insurance and demographics, we found that well-child visits were a risk factor for subsequent influenza-like-illness within the next two weeks for a patient or for a family member. The estimated probability of a subsequent influenza-like illness visit was increased by 3.2 percentage points for those with well-child visit. We estimated that this additional risk translates to over 700,000 cases of influenza-like-illness per year in the United States. Total costs (lost wages, medical costs, etc.) for these infections could amount to $500 million annually.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr Cameron Wolfe MBBS(Hons), MPH
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Clinical / Transplant Infectious Diseases
Duke University Medical Center
MedicalResearch.com: What are the main findings of the study?
Dr. Wolfe: The major findings of the study were that at least in our center, there was a significant burden of critical illness due to H1N1 influenza infection. The average age of the patients admitted to the hospital was just 28yrs, consistent with the younger patient age in 2009 when H1N1 emerged. Most critically, we also observed a significantly lower rate of influenza vaccine uptake in patients admitted to the Intensive Care Units at our center.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Ghassan Dbaibo, M.D., FAAP
Professor and Vice-Chair for Research and Faculty Development
Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
Head, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases
Director, Center for Infectious Diseases Research
Professor, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics
American University of Beirut Beirut, Lebanon
MedicalResearch.com: What are the main findings of the study?
Dr. Dbaibo:
Dr Kate Mandeville MD MPH
Clinical Research Fellow, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for your study?
Dr. Mandeville: The UK spent nearly one billion pounds on pharmaceutical drugs during the swine flu pandemic, including vaccine and antiviral drugs. After the swine flu pandemic, it was revealed that some scientists on the World Health Organization’s advisory committee had links with the pharmaceutical industry. Scientists often provide commentary for journalists on emerging health risks and we set out to see whether scientists commentating on swine flu were also more likely to have links to pharmaceutical companies. We analysed UK newspaper coverage of the swine flu pandemic between April and July 2009. This was the period in which the UK government was making decisions on how best to respond to the emerging pandemic, including providing the public with vaccine and antiviral drugs. We looked for how often scientists were quoted in articles on the pandemic from a wide range of newspapers. We then examined these comments in more detail to see if scientists made an assessment of the risk to the public from swine flu, and compared these against assessments made by official agencies like the Department of Health. We also judged whether the scientists promoted or rejected the use of vaccines or antiviral drugs. For each scientist, we then looked for links with the pharmaceutical industry – or what we formally call competing interests - from a variety of sources, including scientific papers and the internet.
Dr. Donald K. Milton, MD, Dr.P.H
Professor and Director
Maryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health
University of Maryland
MedicalResearch.com: What are the main findings of the study?
Dr. Milton: We found that total viral copies detected by molecular methods were 8.8 times more numerous in fine (≤5 µm) than in coarse (>5 µm) aerosol particles and that the fine particles from cases with the highest total number of viral RNA copies contained infectious virus.
Surgical masks reduced the overall number of RNA copies by 3.4 fold.
Eurekalert Sept 12 2011 Higher flu vaccination rates for health care personnel can dramatically reduce the threat of flu outbreak among nursing home residents, according to a study published in the October issue of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, the journal of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. The study, which...