MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Director of product, labeling, and ingredient review at Registrar Corp (registrarcorp.com
), an FDA consulting firm that helps companies comply with FDA regulations.
She has been assisting companies with U.S. FDA regulations since 2009.
She and her team have researched thousands of products to determine whether they meet FDA requirements for compliance.
In February 2019, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a proposed rule
to put into effect a final monograph for over-the-counter (OTC) sunscreen drug products. If finalized, the rule will update conditions under which OTC sunscreen products may be marketed in the United States. Given the effect this rule could have on the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries, MedicalResearch.com
sat down with Anna Benevente, Director of Product, Labeling, and Ingredient Review at FDA consulting firm Registrar Corp, to dig deeper into the article
they recently published on the rule.
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this announcement?
FDA issues monographs for specific types of over-the-counter (OTC) drug products, which establish conditions under which a drug may be marketed without FDA approval of a New Drug Application (NDA) or Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA). The conditions that are established by the monograph include the active ingredients that have been deemed generally recognized as safe and effective (GRASE) and statements that must appear on the labeling in the form of a Drug Facts panel. Sunscreens have never had an effective final monograph. Instead, they have been largely regulated under enforcement discretion since 2001, when FDA issued a stay on a final monograph for OTC sunscreen drug products.
The Sunscreen Innovation Act (SIA) of 2014 calls for FDA to establish a final monograph for OTC sunscreen by November 26, 2019. If finalized, the rule proposed in February would lift the stay on the final monograph and amend certain regulations for OTC sunscreen drug products.
MedicalResearch.com: What is enforcement discretion?
FDA rulemaking can take a considerable amount of time. During this process, FDA may issue guidance or an enforcement policy that specifies stipulations under which the Agency permits the marketing of certain products in the absence of codified regulations. While these documents are not legally-binding, they often outline provisions where FDA states that the Agency does not intend to take regulatory action. These provisions are often incorporated into an FDA rule, as we are seeing in the case of this new rule for sunscreen.
MedicalResearch.com: Would you explain what GRASE ingredients are?
When FDA establishes a monograph for an OTC drug product, the Agency reviews scientific data on ingredients used for that product and classifies them into three categories:
The ingredient is generally recognized as safe and effective for its intended use.
The ingredient is not generally recognized as safe and effective for its intended use. This ingredient may be not safe as a whole, may be not be safe for the specific intended use, or may not be effective for the specific intended use relative to its health risk.
There is insufficient scientific data to determine whether the ingredient is safe and effective for its intended use.
While a monograph is still in the rulemaking stage, FDA permits the marketing of products formulated with active ingredients that are deemed Category I or Category III. At this time, industry may submit data to support a Category I designation for a Category III ingredient. When the final monograph is published, FDA no longer uses the terms "Category I", "Category II", and "Category III." Those ingredients that were deemed Category I become "monograph conditions," while Category II and III ingredients become "nonmonograph conditions" and may not be marketed after the compliance date identified in the final rule.
Q: What are the main products that would require a label change?
The statement of identity for all sunscreen products would be required to list the sunscreen active ingredients in alphabetical order followed by “Sunscreen” and the product’s dosage form (e.g. “Titanium Dioxide, Zinc Oxide Sunscreen Lotion”). Additionally, the rule proposes formatting changes to sunscreen labels that would make SPF, broad spectrum, and water resistance statements more prominent.
The rule would require all products over 15 SPF to satisfy broad spectrum testing requirements and the associated labeling requirements for broad spectrum products. Products under 15 SPF that do not satisfy broad spectrum requirements would be required to include “*See Skin Cancer/Skin Aging Alert” next to the SPF value as a reference to the warning required under 21 CFR 201.327(d)(2).