04 Aug Columbia University Study Finds Lithium in Tap Water Exceeds Health Screening Levels in Western U.S. Tribal Communities
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Ellen B. Bannon, MPH
PhD Student, Department of Environmental Health Sciences
Columbia Mailman School of Public Health
Ellen Bannon[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Ms. Bannon: Lithium is an increasingly important element thanks to its use in rechargeable batteries and the green energy transition. However, we know relatively little about how people are exposed to lithium in their everyday lives. In many areas of the United States, lithium is present in groundwater and drinking water due to natural weathering processes, but few studies have quantified human exposure to lithium. Our study addresses this gap by measuring lithium in household tap water and urine samples from participants in the Strong Heart Family Study across Tribal communities in Arizona, Oklahoma, North Dakota, and South Dakota. This approach parallels earlier work examining other naturally occurring groundwater contaminants — a framework explored in this MedicalResearch.com overview of how naturally occurring contaminants in drinking water affect human health even at low exposure levels.
Our main findings were threefold. First, household drinking water samples frequently exceeded the United States Geological Survey health-based screening level of 10 µg/L, with 100% and 93% of samples exceeding the screening level in Arizona and North Dakota/South Dakota, respectively. Both water and urine lithium levels were highest in Arizona and lowest in Oklahoma. Second, household drinking water is an important contributor to internal lithium exposure — water lithium concentrations were significantly associated with urinary lithium levels and explained approximately 29% of variation in urinary lithium. Finally, urinary lithium levels remained stable between our urine sampling periods (2006–2009 and 2022–2024), suggesting that environmental lithium exposure has remained persistent over time.
Dr. Chunmiao Zheng[/caption]
Chunmiao Zheng, PhD
AGU Fellow, Chair Professor
Hydrologic Science
Eastern Institute of Technology
Ningbo, China
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of artificially synthesized chemicals widely used in industrial production and consumer goods manufacturing. These substances are persistent in the environment, can accumulate through the food chain, and enter the human body and build up over time, posing a potential threat to health. As an important component of the global diet, marine fish may serve as a major source of PFAS intake for humans. However, the contribution of marine fish as a source of PFAS exposure and the associated health risks still lack systematic assessment on a global scale.
Dr. Hagobian[/caption]
Todd Hagobian, Ph.D.
pronouns he/him/his
Department Chair & Professor, Kinesiology and Public Health
Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Previous observational studies have shown that urinary BPA is related to Type 2 diabetes risk. Meaning, higher urinary BPA is related to an increased risk of Type 2 diabetes. However, no published study to date has determined whether several days of BPA administration (participants consume BPA) increases the risk of Type 2 diabetes.
MedicalResearch.com: Where is bisphenol found? Can exposure to bisphenol be limited in everyday life?
Response: BPA and other bisphenols are found in canned foods and plastics. BPA is one of the most widely used synthetic chemicals and we consume foods that are packed in this chemical. Most of BPA exposure comes from canned foods, and 93% of the US populations has detectable urine levels of BPA. We can limit BPA by reducing canned foods (or purchased BPA free cans) and plastic use.
Prof. Mainelis[/caption]
Gediminas "Gedi" Mainelis, Ph.D.
Professor, Department of Environmental Sciences
School of Environmental and Biological Sciences
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What types of particles, ie where do they come from?
Response: This work is a continuation of my research on nanoparticles in consumer products. We have investigated and published on the release of particles from nano-enabled consumer products, such as cosmetic powders, various sprays and clothing.
In this project, we were interested in potential resuspension of particles once nano-enabled consumer sprays are used. The particles are added into consumer products to provide them certain desired properties, like antimicrobial protection, odor reduction or protection against UV (sunscreen). Once the products are used, the particles are released and we could be exposed to them.