Accidents & Violence, Legal-Malpractice / 14.11.2024

In personal injury cases, the insights and testimony of medical experts can make a pivotal difference. Their specialized knowledge clarifies the extent of injuries, linking them directly to the incident in question. By detailing the impact on a victim’s life and future, these professionals provide a credible, science-backed perspective.  In this article, we will discuss essential evidence that helps juries and judges understand complex medical issues, strengthening a case for fair compensation. 

Establishing the Severity and Extent of Injuries

In personal injury cases, establishing the severity and extent of injuries is crucial to securing fair compensation. According to the CDC, there were around 40.0 million medical emergency department visits each year due to injuries in 2021. Medical experts play an essential role in assessing injuries, detailing the immediate and long-term effects on the victim’s health, mobility, and daily life.  Through comprehensive examinations, diagnostic tests, and professional insights, they evaluate the injuries’ intensity and forecast potential complications or disabilities. Their findings become pivotal evidence, helping to substantiate claims regarding medical expenses, ongoing treatments, and pain and suffering.  Clear, expert-backed documentation of the injury's scope not only strengthens the plaintiff’s case but also provides courts with an objective view of the damages. (more…)
Legal-Malpractice / 31.10.2024

Medical errors can have devastating consequences for patients, leading to severe injury, prolonged suffering, or even death. While healthcare providers are expected to uphold a certain standard of care, mistakes can and do happen. When a healthcare provider’s negligence results in harm to a patient, it may give rise to a medical malpractice lawsuit. If you or a loved one has been harmed due to a medical error, consulting with a Virginia medical malpractice attorney is crucial to understanding your legal rights. An attorney can help you determine whether the error constitutes malpractice and guide you through the process of seeking compensation for your damages. Remember not all adverse outcomes are due to malpractice.  Below are some types of poor outcomes that may be attributed to medical errors or malpractice. (more…)
Legal-Malpractice / 30.10.2024

Medical malpractice is a serious issue that can result in significant harm to patients. However, not all unfavorable medical outcomes qualify as malpractice. Understanding what does not constitute medical malpractice is essential for both patients and healthcare providers. This article explores the distinctions and highlights common scenarios that do not meet the criteria for medical malpractice. Consulting a malpractice lawyer can provide clarity and guidance if you are unsure about your situation.

The Importance of Legal Representation

Determining whether an unfavorable medical outcome constitutes malpractice can be complex. Consulting a malpractice lawyer in Denver can help you understand your rights and whether you have a viable claim. An experienced attorney can provide the necessary legal expertise to navigate these challenging situations.

Understanding Medical Malpractice

Medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare provider deviates from the accepted standard of care, resulting in harm to the patient. To establish a malpractice claim, the following elements must be proven:
  • Duty: The healthcare provider owed a duty of care to the patient.
  • Breach: The provider breached that duty by failing to adhere to the standard of care.
  • Causation: The breach directly caused the patient's injury.
  • Damages: The patient suffered damages as a result of the injury.
(more…)
Legal-Malpractice, OBGYNE, Pediatrics / 19.10.2024

Cerebral Palsy is a neurological disorder that affects movement, posture, and coordination. It is caused by damage to the brain during or shortly after birth and can lead to lifelong disabilities. While there are many known causes of cerebral palsy, medical negligence during childbirth is one of them. When a child is born with cerebral palsy due to medical negligence, it can have devastating effects on both the child and their family. In such cases, seeking help from lawyers for a child's birth injury may be necessary in order to receive justice and compensation for the harm caused. Medical negligence refers to any act or failure to act by a healthcare professional that falls below the accepted standard of care, resulting in harm to the patient. In the case of cerebral palsy, several forms of medical negligence can occur during childbirth and lead to this condition. This is what is discussed in this article. (more…)
Legal-Malpractice / 28.09.2024

Informed consent is one of the foundational principles in medical research and clinical trials. It ensures that participants are fully aware of the potential risks, benefits, and procedures involved in a study before they agree to participate. Over the years, there have been numerous instances where the lack of informed consent has led to ethical scandals and legal ramifications. As medical research becomes more complex, the importance of obtaining genuine, informed consent has grown exponentially. This article explores the intricacies of informed consent in medical research, the ethical obligations of researchers, and the potential legal consequences when consent is not properly obtained or when medical advice falls short of ethical standards. (more…)
Legal-Malpractice / 30.07.2024

Medical negligence can affect anyone seeking healthcare. If hurt by a doctor or hospital's mistake, one may need legal help. Medical negligence lawyers in Sydney can guide you through the process of seeking compensation for your injuries. malpractice-lawyersThere are many cases where patients were left worse off after treatment. Sometimes it's due to a wrong diagnosis, botched surgery, or poor care after an operation. These mistakes can cause serious harm and even death. If you think this has happened to you or a loved one, it's important to know your rights. Getting legal advice early can make a big difference. A good lawyer will look at your case for free and tell you if you have a claim. They'll help gather evidence and deal with the other side. This lets you focus on getting better while they handle the legal stuff. (more…)
Legal-Malpractice / 17.07.2024

Healthcare fraud is a serious issue that affects both patients and providers. The complexity of healthcare regulations makes it easy for even honest mistakes to lead to severe consequences. This is where a healthcare fraud attorney steps in. This article explains why you might need one and how they can help protect your interests.

Understanding Healthcare Fraud

Healthcare fraud involves the misrepresentation or intentional deception that results in unauthorized benefits. It’s a broad term covering various illicit activities within the healthcare industry. 

Common Types of Healthcare Fraud

Healthcare fraud can manifest in various ways, each with its unique methods and consequences. Understanding these types of fraud is crucial for patients and providers to recognize and prevent fraudulent activities. From billing schemes to illicit referrals, let's explore the most common types: - Billing for Services Not Rendered. This is when providers bill for medical services or never performed procedures. - Upcoding. Upcoding is the billing for a more expensive service than was provided. - Kickbacks. Kickbacks occur when providers receive incentives for referring patients to specific services or suppliers. When we face legal issues related to healthcare fraud, consulting a medicare fraud attorney is crucial.  (more…)
Legal-Malpractice, Nursing / 27.06.2024

nurse-talking-to-older-patientsHave you ever thought about what your rights are when a nurse hurts you? Knowing these rights can help protect you in strange scenarios. Nursing abuse can have very bad effects, so people need to be aware of it. This guide will teach you about your rights and protect you. To take an informed approach, you need to be able to spot common malpractice cases and stand up for your rights. To protect your health, stay aware and take action.   Learn the basics of nursing malpractice cases to protect your rights in health care. Read on!

Safe and Competent Care

Safe and skilled care is very important in nursing to keep patients healthy and build trust. Nurses must provide care that follows rules and standards. Proper training and following guidelines help reduce mistakes. Patients deserve a healthcare setting where their safety and well-being come first, thanks to careful and competent nursing. (more…)
Legal-Malpractice / 23.03.2024

malpractice-legalissues-virginiaWhen you visit your doctor, you expect to receive accurate diagnoses and appropriate treatment. However, medical professionals can sometimes make mistakes that have serious consequences for patients. If you believe you have been the victim of a misdiagnosis in Virginia, you may be wondering about your legal options. Can you sue your doctor for a wrong diagnosis? Consider the hypothetical case of Sarah, a hardworking professional plagued by persistent fatigue and headaches. After a series of tests with ambiguous results, her physician diagnoses her with chronic fatigue syndrome. Feeling a sense of relief at finally having an answer, Sarah diligently follows the recommended treatment plan and makes significant lifestyle changes. Despite her efforts, her health continues to deteriorate. Seeking a second opinion, Sarah discovers that she actually has a tumor which, while treatable, has gone undetected and caused substantial harm. Sarah's story illustrates the potentially devastating impact of a misdiagnosis, leaving her with both emotional trauma and severe medical issues. (more…)
Author Interviews, Health Care Systems, JAMA / 13.02.2023

MedicalResearch.com Interview with: David A. Hyman, JD, MD The Scott K. Ginsburg Professor of Health Law & Policy Georgetown University Law Center Washington, DC MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? Response: Many doctors believe medical malpractice claiming is effectively random — meaning good doctors are equally likely as bad doctors to end up being the target of a malpractice claim.  Past research has studied whether physicians with 2 paid claims are likely to have another claim than doctors with 1 paid claim. We study whether physicians with 1 paid claim are more likely to have another paid claim, compared to physicians with zero paid claims.  We also compare the pattern of observed claims with what we would expect to find if claiming were truly random (by running a simulation). (more…)
Author Interviews, Surgical Research / 03.11.2020

MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Dr. Pravesh S. Gadjradj, MD Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, University Neurosurgical Center Holland Leiden, Netherlands neurosurgery brain surgery ct scan MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?  Response: Many healthcare professionals throughout the world face issues surrounding medical malpractice at some point in their careers. Unfortunately, a number of these cases turn into medical malpractice lawsuits. As a specialty that treats acute pathology and refractory pain, neurosurgery is at risk for high liability. By the means of a survey among members of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS), we aimed to illustrate how malpractice lawsuits affect neurosurgeons professionally, emotionally and financially.   MedicalResearch.com: What are the main findings?  Response: Some 490 members of the CNS shared their experiences with us. Among these members, 81% faced a medical malpractice lawsuit. The main concerns expressed about being sued included losing confidence and practicing defensive medicine, personal assets being at risk, and being named in the National Practitioner Data Bank. Of the respondents, 40% stated they were frequently or always concerned about being sued, and 77 % stated their fear had led to a change in how they practice medicine. For 58 %, this change led to the practice of defensive medicine, while for others it led to more extensive documentation (14%) and/or to referring or dropping complex cases (12%). Given the medical malpractice environment, 59% of respondents considered referring complex patient cases, whereas 37% considered leaving the practice of medicine. (more…)
Author Interviews, Cost of Health Care, JAMA / 22.05.2019

MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Dan Ly, MD, MPP Ph.D. Program in Health Policy Harvard MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? Response: There is some mixed evidence regarding whether state level tort reform reduces defensive medicine, or the practicing of medicine in such a way to reduce medical liability. This includes “positive” defensive medicine, or performing certain tests and procedures to reduce such liability. Other research finds that the perception of malpractice risk drives such defensive medicine, including the use of diagnostic imaging, such as CT scans and MRIs. I was interested in exploring what influenced the perception of this risk, hypothesizing that, for a physician, a report of an injury against one’s colleague might increase the perception of this risk and lead to an increase the use of diagnostic imaging. (more…)
Author Interviews, Cost of Health Care / 23.07.2018

MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Jonathan Gruber PhD Department of Economics, E52-434 MIT Cambridge, MA 02139 MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?  Response: There is a large literature trying to estimate the extent of 'defensive  medicine' by looking at what happens when it gets harder to sue and/or  you can win less money. But there have been no studies of what happens if you just get rid of the right to sue.  That's what we have with active duty patients treated on a military base. The main finding is that when patients can't sue they are treated about  5% less intensively.  Much of the effect appears to arise from fewer diagnostic tests. (more…)
Author Interviews, Dermatology, JAMA / 11.02.2015

Omar A. Ibrahimi, M.D., Ph.D Connecticut Skin Institute Founding Medical Director Stamford, CT 06905MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Omar A. Ibrahimi, M.D., Ph.D Connecticut Skin Institute Founding Medical Director Stamford, CT 06905 www.ctskindoc.com Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Dr. Ibrahimi: The delivery of healthcare in a efficient and cost effective fashion is one of the largest themes in medicine today. Malpractice lawsuits have steadily increased with the cost of healthcare delivery. Mohs surgery involves the surgical removal, the tissue analysis and the reconstruction of a skin cancer all in a single visit that bundles multiple procedures in a cost effective manner that is proposed to be the gold standard for treating certain skin cancers. Information regarding malpractice involving Mohs surgery is lacking. The only previous study that has been done was a survey of Mohs surgeons looking at how many had been involved in lawsuits and the reasons for being involved. Our study examined a legal database to identify all the lawsuits involving Mohs surgery and skin cancer. We were surprised to find that the majority of lawsuits involved non-Mohs surgeons as the primary defendant, mostly due to a delay of or failure in diagnosis, cosmetic outcome issues, lack of informed consent, and a delay of or failure in referral to a Mohs surgeon. (more…)
Author Interviews, Brigham & Women's - Harvard, Surgical Research / 01.02.2015

Timothy R. Smith, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H. Pituitary/Neuroendoscopy Fellow Department of Neurosurgery Brigham & Womens Hospital Harvard University Boston, MA 02115MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Timothy R. Smith, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H. Pituitary/Neuroendoscopy Fellow Department of Neurosurgery Brigham & Womens Hospital Harvard University Boston, MA 0211 Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Dr. Smith: Defensive medicine is the practice of prescribing unnecessary medical treatment for fear of being sued – it is widely practiced in the United States and contributes to our rising healthcare costs. In high-risk specialties such as neurosurgery, the fear of litigation leads to defensive practices that actually impact clinical decisions. A 2009 American College of Emergency Physicians report created malpractice risk profiles for each state based on its legal atmosphere, tort reform, and insurance availability. Based on these profiles, each state was ranked from 1 to 50 and sorted into separate categories, ranging from A, for the best liability environment, to F, for the worst. We sent a 51-question, anonymous online survey, which covered topics ranging from patient characteristics to surgeon liability profiles, to board-certified US neurosurgeons in the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. The purpose was to determine how neurosurgeons’ perceptions of their medico-legal environments correlated with these established state risk profiles, as well as whether each state’s liability risk environment was a predictor of defensive medical practices. We found that though the average malpractice insurance premium was $103,000 per year, neurosurgeons from high-risk states paid significantly more ($128,000) than those from low-risk states did ($75,000). Even with these amounts, almost 70% of respondents felt that their insurance coverage was inadequate, and 90% felt that the insurance premium was a financial burden. Neurosurgeons from high-risk states were also twice as likely to have been sued as those from low-risk states were. More than 80% of respondents ordered additional imaging for defensive medical purposes, and more than 75% said they ordered additional laboratory tests and made unnecessary referrals for defensive purposes; this behavior was more prevalent in high-risk states. After controlling for important confounders, we found that for every letter-grade change from “A” to “F”, neurosurgeons are 1.5 times more likely to engage in defensive behaviors. For example, moving from a “D” state to an “A” state represents 4.5 fold difference in defensive behaviors. (more…)
Author Interviews, Cost of Health Care, Emergency Care, NEJM, UCLA / 16.10.2014

Daniel A. Waxman, MD, PhD Department of Emergency Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine University of California, Los Angeles RAND Corporation Santa Monica, CaliforniaMedicalResearch.com Interview with: Daniel A. Waxman, MD, PhD Department of Emergency Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine University of California, Los Angeles RAND Corporation Santa Monica, California Medical Research: What are the main findings of the study? Dr. Waxman: About 10 years ago, three states (Texas, Georgia, and South Carolina) passed laws which made it much harder for doctors to be sued for malpractice related to emergency room care.   The goal of our research was to determine whether the lower risk of being sued translated into less costly care by emergency physicians.  To figure this out, we looked at the billing records of nearly 4 million Medicare patients and compared care before and after the laws took effect, and between states that passed reform and neighboring states that didn’t change their laws.   We found that these substantial legal protections didn’t cause ER doctors to admit fewer patients to the hospital, to order fewer CT or MRI scans, or to spend less for the overall ER visit. (more…)
Author Interviews, Esophageal, JAMA, University of Michigan / 01.10.2014

Megan A. Adams, MD Gastroenterology Fellow University of MichiganMedicalResearch.com Interview with Megan A. Adams, MD Gastroenterology Fellow University of Michigan   Medical Research: What are the main findings of the study? Dr. Adams: Surveys of doctors indicate that their fear of a malpractice lawsuit for missing a diagnosis of esophageal cancer might drive the overuse of tests called upper endoscopies in patients who are at low risk for the cancer. To examine whether this perception of medical liability risk accurately reflects the real likelihood of a malpractice claim, we looked at a national database of malpractice claims, and compared the rate of claims for delay in diagnosis of esophageal cancer in patients without alarm symptoms (weight loss, dysphagia, iron deficiency anemia), with the rate of claims alleging performance of an upper endoscopy without a good reason for performing the procedure. The database contained 278,220 claims filed against physicians in 1985-2012. The incidence of reported medical liability claims for failure to screen for esophageal cancer in patients without alarm features was quite low (19 claims in 11 years, 4 paid). In contrast, there were 17 claims in 28 years for complications of upper endoscopies with questionable indication (8 paid). (more…)