Posted at 09:21h
in
Mayo Clinic,
Urology
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Daniel S. Elliott, M.D
MAYO Clinic, Associate Professor
Department of Urology
Section of Pelvic and Reconstructive Surgery
Rochester, Minnesota
MedicalResearch: What are the main findings of the study?
Dr. Elliott: The biggest issue is that we were able to devise a new procedure that is a simple outpatient anti-incontinence surgery for women that does NOT use any synthetic meshes. The importance of this is that all traditional (meaning NON-mesh) surgeries for female incontinence have been large surgeries with fairly significant risks such as pain, bleeding and prolonged recovery. When the meshes came out in the late ‘90’s, their big benefit was that they were outpatient and quick procedures. But now that we are discovering all the long term complications from meshes such as chronic pain, scarring, painful intercourse, vaginal extrusion of the meshes, and organ injury, patients have become VERY reluctant and fearful to undergo any mesh type surgery. Therefore, we devised a new procedure that used a very small piece of the patient’s own tissue (from the rectus fascia) and placed this via the “transobturator route.” In the process, we melded together the “best” of both worlds---a NON-mesh, outpatient anti-incontinence procedure that is safe (no long term problems as seen with meshes) .