Author Interviews, CMAJ, End of Life Care / 12.01.2026
Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada: Assessors Discuss Eligibility Decision Making
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
[caption id="attachment_71968" align="alignleft" width="200"]
Dr. Thorne[/caption]
Sally Thorne RN, PhD, FAAN, FCAHS, FCAN, CM
Professor Emeritus, School of Nursing
Co-Principal Investigator with :
[caption id="attachment_71969" align="alignleft" width="133"]
Dr. Pesut[/caption]
Dr. Barbara Pesut PhD, RN
Professor in the School of Nursing
Principal Research Chair in Palliative and End of Life Care
University of British Columbia
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Medical assistance in dying (MAiD) was legalized in Canada in June of 2016 for Canadians who were facing a reasonably foreseeable natural death and met an explicit set of eligibility criteria as determined by qualified health care providers (physicians or nurse practitioners). In 2021, the legislation was extended to include the possibility of MAiD for persons who were suffering from a ‘grievous and irremediable’ medical condition but for whom natural death was not immediately foreseeable. As assisted dying represented a significant change in available options for Canadians with terminal or chronic conditions, requiring significant practice adaptations and including numerous legal, social, ethical, moral implications, the health research community has been working in consultation with clinicians, service providers and governments to generate knowledge that ensures safe, ethical and equitable practice in this regard.
Dr. Thorne[/caption]
Sally Thorne RN, PhD, FAAN, FCAHS, FCAN, CM
Professor Emeritus, School of Nursing
Co-Principal Investigator with :
[caption id="attachment_71969" align="alignleft" width="133"]
Dr. Pesut[/caption]
Dr. Barbara Pesut PhD, RN
Professor in the School of Nursing
Principal Research Chair in Palliative and End of Life Care
University of British Columbia
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Medical assistance in dying (MAiD) was legalized in Canada in June of 2016 for Canadians who were facing a reasonably foreseeable natural death and met an explicit set of eligibility criteria as determined by qualified health care providers (physicians or nurse practitioners). In 2021, the legislation was extended to include the possibility of MAiD for persons who were suffering from a ‘grievous and irremediable’ medical condition but for whom natural death was not immediately foreseeable. As assisted dying represented a significant change in available options for Canadians with terminal or chronic conditions, requiring significant practice adaptations and including numerous legal, social, ethical, moral implications, the health research community has been working in consultation with clinicians, service providers and governments to generate knowledge that ensures safe, ethical and equitable practice in this regard.
Dr. Chua[/caption]
Isaac Chua, MD, MPH
Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care
Brigham and Women's Hospital
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Patient surveys have shown that most people prefer to die at home at the end-of-life. However, during the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, anecdotal evidence from our colleagues and findings from a prior study published in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society suggested that majority of COVID-19 decedents died in a medical facility. However, less is known about care intensity at the end-of-life according to place of death among patients who died of COVID-19. Therefore, we characterized end-of-life care by place of death among COVID-19 decedents at Mass General Brigham (MGB), the largest health system in Massachusetts.
Dr. Blundon[/caption]
Elizabeth Blundon PhD
Department of Psychology
University of British Columbia – Vancouver
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Many healthcare workers have noticed that dying patients appear to be comforted by the words of their loved ones, even when patients appear to be unconscious and are no longer able to communicate. There is a persistent belief, therefore, that hearing may persist into the last hours of someone's life. Our study attempts to detect evidence of hearing among a small group of unresponsive hospice patients at the end of life.
To do this, we compared the brain activity of young, healthy control participants, with the brain activity of hospice patients, both when the patients were awake and responsive, and again when they became unresponsive. The brain activity we measured was in response to a complex series of tone-patterns, where participants were asked to identify by pressing a button (control participants) or by counting (hospice patients) every time they heard a tone-pattern that was different from the rest of the series.










