MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Ahmad Haidar PhD
Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montreal
Montreal, QC, Canada
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: We published a study in 2013 (Canadian Medical Association Journal 185.4 (2013): 297-305) where we did the first randomized trial comparing dual-hormone artificial pancreas against conventional pump therapy. We showed spectacular reduction in hypoglycemia (8-fold) with the artificial pancreas, but the first question people asked: Out of the improvement you showed, how much is due to simply closing the loop between the glucose sensor and the insulin pump, and how much is due to adding glucagon? In other words: if you just close the loop with insulin alone and use an advanced dosing algorithm, you may get a very high reduction of hypoglycemia that glucagon may not be needed (glucagon is associated with increased cost and device complexity). We were not able to answer this question with our study design.
Since then, there have been other studies by other groups either comparing single-hormone artificial pancreas vs conventional pump therapy, or comparing dual-hormone artificial pancreas vs conventional pump therapy, and most of these studies showed improvement of both artificial pancreas systems compared to conventional pump therapy. However, there has been no study comparing the three interventions to allow us to quantify the relative benefits of simply closing the loop between glucose sensor and insulin pump versus adding glucagon to the system. Quantifying the relative benefits of glucagon is important given the increased cost and device complexity of the dual-hormone artificial pancreas.
So our study compared the three interventions, and is the first study to do so.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Seth A. Berkowitz, MD, MPH
Division of General Internal Medicine
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Berkowitz: Prior studies had looked the association between single unmet basic material needs and diabetes control, but hadn't necessarily looked at multiple things people may not be able to afford, which more closely mirrors real-life. Also, prior studies had been done in a 'pre-Affordable Care Act' setting, while, by being in Massachusetts, our study was conducted in a setting of near-universal healthcare coverage that is similar to what the rest of the US is moving towards. We found that difficulties meeting basic material needs, such as difficulties affording food, known as food insecurity, and having financial barriers to taking medications, called cost-related medication underuse, are associated with worse diabetes control and increased use of costly health services in diabetes patients, despite near-universal health insurance coverage
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Aramesh Saremi MD
Phoenix VA Health Care System
Health Research Scientist
Phoenix, AZ 85012-1892
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Saremi: Our study was a post-hoc analysis of the data that was available from VA cooperative study, the Veterans Affair Diabetes Trial (VADT). The VADT was one of the recent landmark studies examining the effect of intensive glycemic control on cardiovascular events in older adults with type 2 diabetes.
The main finding in the VADT and other two other landmark studies (ACCORD and ADVANCE ) was that intensive glycemic control does not reduce cardiovascular disease events in people with type 2 diabetes of moderate to long duration. However, our subsequent post-hoc analysis suggests that intensive glycemic control was associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular events in Hispanics, but not in non-Hispanic Whites or Blacks.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Simin Liu, MD, ScD, Professor of Epidemiology
School of Public Health, Professor of Medicine
The Warren Alpert School of Medicine
Director, Molecular Epidemiology and Nutrition
Brown University
MedicalResearch: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Liu: Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are highly heritable and share many risk factors and show ethnic-specific prevalence. Nevertheless, a comprehensive molecular-level understanding of these observations is lacking. We conducted a comprehensive assessment of whole genome assessment using network-based analysis in >15,000 women and identified eight molecular pathways share in both diseases as well as several “key driver” genes that appear to form the gene networks in which these pathways connect and interact.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Longjian Liu, MD, PhD, MSc(LSHTM), FAHA
Interim Chair, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Associate Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Senior Investigator, Center for Health Equality
Drexel University School of Public Health, and
Adjunct Associate Professor of Medicine, Drexel U. College of Medicine
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Liu: The prevalence of diabetes is increasing rapidly in the United States and worldwide. In 2010, 25.8 million Americans, or 8.3% of the population had diabetes in the United States. In 2012, these figures were 29.1 million, or 9.3% in the nation. Philadelphia, the largest city in PA, ranks as the 5th largest city in the nation. However, the city also had the highest prevalence of diabetes according to the national surveys in 2009. We face a great challenge to stop the epidemic of diabetes locally and nationally. It is well-known personal risk factors at individual level, including lifestyles, play a role in the prevention and control of diabetes. However very limited studies addressed the importance that physical and socioeconomic environmental factors at community level may also play a pivotal role in the prevention and control of the disease. This study aimed to quantitatively examine (1) the trend of diabetes from 2002 to 2010 in the city of Philadelphia, and (2) the impact of physical and socioeconomic environmental factors at community level (assessed using zip-codes based neighborhoods) on the risk of the prevalence of diabetes.
The main findings support our hypotheses that
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Lauren Marie Sparks, PhD
Faculty Scientist at the Translational Research Institute for Metabolism and Diabetes
Florida Hospital and the Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute Orlando, FL
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Sparks: As a clinical scientist focused on exercise effects on muscle metabolism in diabetes, I have seen first-hand a significant minority of individuals with diabetes not improve their glucose control (HbA1c) after 9 months of supervised exercise. They poured their hearts out on those treadmills 3-4 days a week for 9 months and still ended up no better than when they started. I have also seen similar data from some of my colleagues’ studies. So I really want diabetes research to invest the intellect and dollars into discovering what these roadblocks are—I happen to believe it is in the DNA (genetics) and the way that DNA is “read” or expressed (epigenetics). So it’s a bit of a ‘call to action’ for researchers to start looking into some of their data to find these people and better understand this phenomenon and for hopefully the funding sources to recognize this as a viable area of research.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Patrice Carter
Diabetes, Nutrition & Lifestyle Research Associate
Diabetes Research Centre (Broadleaf) University of Leicester
Leicester General Hospital Leicester UK
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Carter: Type 2 diabetes is a growing concern, worldwide prevalence is expected to increase to 552million by 2030. Prevalence is closely linked to increasing obesity rates which are associated to environmental changes that have led to more sedentary lifestyles and poor-quality dietary intake. Consumption of fast food has previously been linked to the obesity epidemic and consumption is associated with low adherence to dietary recommendations.
We analysed data of over 10,000 individuals to investigate the association between screen detected type 2 diabetes and the number of fast food outlets in their neighbourhood.
In summary we found the mean number of fast food outlets in areas with high social deprivation as compared to low social deprivation; mean number of outlets was 3.53 (SD 4.83) and 0.91 (1.89) respectively. The number of fast food outlets was positively associated with screen-detected type 2 diabetes (OR=1.05; 95% CI 1.04, 1.07; p<0.001). In addition, we used these data to calculate that for every additional two outlets we would expect to see one more diabetes case, assuming a 7% prevalence of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes in neighbourhoods with no outlets and approximately 200 residents in a 500m radius, and assuming a causal relationship.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Gang Hu, MD, MPH, PhD, FAHA
Assistant professor & Director
Chronic Disease Epidemiology Lab
Adjunct assistant professor, School of Public Health
LSU Health Sciences Center
Pennington Biomedical Research Center,
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Hu: Many previous studies had small samples, and thus lacked adequate statistical power when the analysis was focused on those who are extremely obese (BMI ≥40 kg/m2). In addition, most epidemiological studies only use a single measurement of BMI at baseline to predict risk of all-cause mortality, which may produce potential bias. The current study indicated a U-shaped association of BMI with all-cause mortality risk among African American and white patients with type 2 diabetes. A significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality was observed among African Americans with BMI<30 kg/m2 and BMI ≥35 kg/m2, and among whites with BMI<25 kg/m2 and BMI ≥40 kg/m2 compared with patients with BMI 30-34.9 kg/m2.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Tim A. Holt PhD MRCP FRCGP
NIHR Academic Clinical Lecturer
University of Oxford
Department of Primary Care Health Sciences
Radcliffe Observatory Quarter
Woodstock Road Oxford
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Holt: Undiagnosed diabetes is a serious and very costly problem. Early diagnosis is important to reduce risk of long term complications. A structured approach to management at the practice level involves electronic diabetes registers, enabling audit of care, automated recall, and screen reminders. Such registers depend on the presence of an electronic code for diabetes in the record.
MedicalResearch.com: Interview with:
Dr. Cora Peterson PhD
Health Economist at Centers for Disease Control
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Peterson: Women with pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM) have increased risk for adverse birth outcomes. Preconception care for women with pregestational diabetes mellitus reduces the frequency of such outcomes, most likely by improving glycemic control before and during the critical first weeks of pregnancy.
Preconception care for women with pregestational diabetes mellitus includes the following activities:
MedicalResearch.com: Interview with:
Dr. David Hodson PhD
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine
Imperial College London
Medical Research: What is the background for this research?
Dr. Hodson: Type 2 diabetes represents a huge socioeconomic challenge. As well as causing significant morbidity due to chronically elevated glucose levels, this disease is also a drain on healthcare budgets (~$20billion in the UK per year). While current treatments are effective, they are sometimes associated with side effects, usually due to off-target actions on organs such as the heart and brain. In addition, the ability to regulate blood glucose levels more tightly may decrease complications stemming from type diabetes (e.g. nerve, kidney and retina damage). As a proof-of-principle that the spatiotemporal precision of light can be harnessed to finely guide and control drug activity, we therefore decided to produce a light-activated anti-diabetic.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Anita P. Courcoulas M.D., M.P.H., F.A.C.S
Professor of Surgery
Director, Minimally Invasive Bariatric & General Surgery
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Medical Research: What are the main findings of the study?
Dr. Courcoulas: This paper was not a study but a summary of findings from a multidisciplinary workshop (and not a consensus panel) convened in May 2013 by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The goal of the workshop was to summarize the current state of knowledge of bariatric surgery, review research findings on the long-term outcomes of bariatric surgery, and establish priorities for future research.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr Nita Forouhi, MRCP, PhD, FFPHM
Lead Scientist and Programme Leader
MRC Programme Leader and Consultant Public Health Physician
MRC Epidemiology Unit
University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine
Cambridge Biomedical Campus Cambridge, UK
Medical Research: What are the main findings of the study?
Dr. Forouhi: This large study found that low blood concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], a clinical indicator of vitamin D status, were associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes, but this did not appear to be a cause-effect relationship. To investigate these associations, we did two things. We first did a systematic review and meta-analysis across 22 published studies and confirmed that there was a strong inverse relation between vitamin D levels and the risk of future new-onset type 2 diabetes among people who did not initially have diabetes. We then used a genetic approach, called Mendelian randomisation, which allows us to test a cause-effect relationship, and found that genetically lower vitamin D levels were not related to risk of type 2 diabetes. This means that we were able to distinguish between association and causation, and concluded that the vitamin D levels did not have a causal link with type 2 diabetes.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Prof Mika Kivimäki PhD
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health,
University College London, London, UK
Hjelt Institute, Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Medical Research: What are the main findings of the study?
Prof. Kivimäki: In our study, we pooled published and unpublished data from 222 120 men and women from the USA, Europe, Japan, and Australia. Of them, 4963 individuals developed type 2 diabetes during the mean follow-up of 7.6 years. This is the largest study to date on this topic.
In an analysis stratified by socioeconomic status, the association between long working hours and diabetes was evident in the low socioeconomic status group, but was null in the high socioeconomic status group. The association in the low socioeconomic status group did not change after taking into account age, sex, obesity, physical activity, and shift working. So, the association was very robust.
In brief, the main finding of our meta-analysis is that the link between longer working hours and type 2 diabetes was apparent only in individuals in the low socioeconomic status groups.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Steven Brown
School of Healthcare Science
Faculty of Engineering
Manchester Metropolitan University UK
Medical Research: What are the main findings of the study?
Answer: Our main findings were increased extremes of sideways sway in patients with diabetes and severe peripheral neuropathy during stair negotiation. Measured by an increase in the amount of lateral separation between the centre-of-mass and centre-of-pressure. Our results showed a 3cm increase in maximum sway in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy during both stair descent and stair ascent.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Carlos F. Sánchez-Ferrer, M.D., Ph.D.
Professor of Pharmacology
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.
Medical Research: What are the main findings of the study?
Dr. Sánchez-Ferrer: We were studying the possible ways of interaction between high glucose levels, which are found in diabetes mellitus, with vascular damage,
which is the most common and devastating consequence of this disease.
An intriguing fact is that a very strict control of blood sugar in
diabetic patients is not sufficient to avoid the development of such
diabetes-induced cardiovascular diseases. We think our results can
explain why this is happening.
Using cultured smooth muscle cells from the main human artery (aorta)
in the presence of high concentrations of extracellular glucose, we
observed:
1. In the absence of inflammation, excess glucose in the culture fluid
didn’t enter the cells.
2. When extra glucose was forced into the cells, no harm was done in
the absence of inflammation.
3. When the inflammation-stimulating protein interleukin-1 (IL-1) was
introduced, more glucose entered the cells.
4. With IL-1, the glucose entering the cells was metabolized via
chemical pathways that spur escalating inflammation, overwhelming the
cells’ ability to counteract it.
5. In the presence of the anti-inflammatory drug anakinra, which blocks
the activity of IL-1, the deleterious changes didn’t occur.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Kristian Filion, PhD FAHA
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Division of Clinical Epidemiology
Jewish General Hospital/McGill University
Montreal, Quebec H3T 1E2 Canada
Medical Research: What are the main findings of the study?
Dr. Filion: Previous studies have raised concerns that the use of incretin-based drugs, a type of medication used to treat diabetes, may increase the risk of congestive heart failure. We therefore examined this potential drug safety issue using a large, population-based database, which allowed us to study the safety of these medications in a real world setting. In doing so, we found that the use of incretin-based drugs was not associated with an increased risk of congestive heart failure among patients with type 2 diabetes. Similar results were obtained among both classes of incretin-based drugs (glucagon like peptide-1 [GLP-1] analogs and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 [DPP-4] inhibitors), and no duration-response relationship was observed.
Dr. Sophia Zoungas:
Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences
Monash University, Clayton
Medical Research: What are the main findings of the study
Dr. Zoungas: Our study shows that age (or age at diagnosis) and duration of diabetes disease are linked to the risk of death and marcovascular complications (those in larger blood vessels) whereas only diabetes duration is linked to the risk of microvascular complications (in smaller blood vessels such as those in the kidney and eyes)
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Paul M. Macey, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor in Residence
Associate Dean for Information Technology and Innovations,
Chief Innovation Officer UCLA School of Nursing and Brain Research Institute
Medical Research: What are the main findings of the study?
Dr. Macey: People with sleep apnea are less able to control the blood flowing to their brain, in particular when they grip tightly, or have their foot put in cold water. We measured changes in blood flowing through the brain using an MRI scanner while people gripped hard, had their foot placed in cold water, and breathed out hard into a tube with a very small hole in it. These activities all lead to more blood flowing to the brain in healthy people, which probably helps protect the cells from being starved of blood and oxygen. However, people with sleep apnea send less blood that the healthy participants during the gripped and cold foot activities.
A further important finding is that women with sleep apnea are worse off than men. The female patients showed much weaker blood flow than the males, even accounting for normal differences between men and women.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Mary G. Lynch, MD
Professor of Ophthalmology
Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center Decatur, Georgia.
Department of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
Medical Research: What are the main findings of the study?
Dr. Lynch: