Diagnostic Accuracy of FFR-CT Varies Across Spectrum of Coronary Artery Disease

MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr Christopher Michael Cook MBBS Bsc(Hons) MRCP

MRC Clinical Research Fellow
NHLI, Cardiovascular Medicine, Imperial College London 

MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?

Response: FFR-CT is a novel non-invasive technique for estimating the functional significance of a coronary stenosis from CT coronary angiography images. A number of meta-analyses already exist for determining the diagnostic accuracy of FFR-CT (compared to invasive FFR as the reference standard). However, although knowing the overall diagnostic accuracy of FFR-CT is reassuring, in clinical practice a clinician knows not only whether the FFR-CT is positive or negative, but also its actual value. The purpose of this study was to provide clinicians a means of interpreting the diagnostic accuracy of any individual FFR-CT result that may be received in clinical practice.

MedicalResearch.com: What are the main findings?

Response: The main finding of this study is that the diagnostic accuracy of FFR-CT varies markedly across the spectrum of disease. For vessels with FFR-CT above 0.90, 98% met the invasive FFR guideline criterion for deferral. At the other end of the spectrum, for vessels with FFR-CT below 0.60, 86% met the invasive FFR guideline criterion for stenting. However, in between, FFR-CT gives less certainty as to whether the invasive FFR will meet the stenting criterion or not.

MedicalResearch.com: What should readers take away from your report?

Response: Readers can combine the findings of our study with patient specific factors in order to judge when the cost and risk of an invasive angiogram may safely be avoided. Because we now have a more complete picture of what different levels of FFR-CT mean in terms of invasive FFR, it is apparent that a single cut-off value for FFR-CT in deciding on invasive coronary angiography need not always apply. For example, in the asymptomatic patient, further investigations may not be desirable even if an FFR-CT still left a substantial possibility of a positive invasive FFR. Conversely, in the symptomatic patient, the patient and clinician would likely pursue invasive angiography unless the possibility of a positive FFR is very remote.

MedicalResearch.com: What recommendations do you have for future research as a result of this study?

Response: This study adopted novel methodology to ascertain the probability that both FFR-CT and invasive FFR agreed on the functional classification of a stenosis, for any given individual FFR-CT value. This type of analysis could be used to determine if further iterative versions of the FFR-CT software translate into improved diagnostic performance, particularly in more intermediate disease severities. 

MedicalResearch.com: Is there anything else you would like to add?

Response:

MedicalResearch.com: Thank you for your contribution to the MedicalResearch.com community.

Citation:

Cook CM, Petraco R, Shun-Shin MJ, Ahmad Y, Nijjer S, Al-Lamee R, Kikuta Y, Shiono Y, Mayet J, Francis DP, Sen S, Davies JE. Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomography–Derived Fractional Flow Reserve A Systematic Review . JAMA Cardiol. Published online May 24, 2017. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1314

Note: Content is Not intended as medical advice. Please consult your health care provider regarding your specific medical condition and questions.

More Medical Research Interviews on MedicalResearch.com

 

 

iFR Can Assess Need For Coronary Revascularization Without Adenosine

MedicalResearch.com Interview with:

Dr. Justin Davies PhD Senior Reserch Fellow and Hononary Consultant Cardiologist National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College Londo

Dr. Davies

Dr. Justin Davies PhD
Senior Reserch Fellow and Hononary Consultant Cardiologist
National Heart and Lung Institute,
Imperial College London

MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?

Response: We know from the FAME study that compared to angiography alone, FFR guided revascularization improves long-term clinical outcomes for our patients. Despite this, adoption of FFR into everyday clinical practice remains stubbornly low. One major factor for this is the need for adenosine (or other potent vasodilator medications) in order to perform an FFR measurement. Adenosine is expensive, unpleasant for the patient, time consuming and even potentially harmful.

iFR is a newer coronary physiology index that does not require adenosine for its measurement. In the prospective, multi center, blinded DEFINE FLAIR study, 2492 patients were randomly assigned to either FFR guided revascularisation or iFR guided revascularization and followed up for a period of 1 year.
Continue reading

11 Cancer Types Have Strong Connection to Obesity

MedicalResearch.com Interview with:

Dr Maria Kyrgiou MSc, PhD, MRCOG Clinical Senior Lecturer & Consultant in Gynaecologic Oncology IRDB - Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Queen Charlotte's & Chelsea-Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust

Dr. Kyrgiou

Dr Maria Kyrgiou MSc, PhD, MRCOG
Clinical Senior Lecturer & Consultant in Gynaecologic Oncology
IRDB – Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London
West London Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Queen Charlotte’s & Chelsea-Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust 

MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Obesity has become a major public health challenge and it’s prevalence worldwide has more than doubled amongst women n the last four decadesExcess body weight has been associated with an increased risk of developing and dying from numerous cancers. Although the reported associations may be potentially causal, some of the associations may be flawed due to inherent study biases such as residual confounding and selective reporting of positive results.

We included 204 meta-analyses investigating associations between adiposity and the development or death from 36 primary cancers and their sub-types. Adiposity was associated with a higher risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma, gastric cardia, colon and rectal cancer in men, biliary tract system, pancreatic, postmenopausal breast among HRT non-users, endometrial, ovarian, and kidney cancer and multiple myeloma.

Continue reading

Allergic Rhinitis: Three Years of Immunotherapy Gives Longer Lasting Symptom Control

MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Stephen R. Durham, MD

Imperial College, London, and Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals
NHS Foundation Trust
London, United Kingdom

MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?

Response: Allergic rhinitis affects 1 in 4 the UK population and may compromise sleep and work/school performance and be associated with bronchial asthma. When nasal steroids and antihistamines do not work or cause side effects, allergen immunotherapy is an alternative. Immunotherapy using high doses of grass pollen allergen as monthly injections or daily tablets under the tongue are highly effective. Treatment for 3 years not only gives sustained improvement on treatment but also long-term benefits and disease remission for at least 2-3 years after stopping treatment.

This single centre study at Imperial College London and Royal Brompton Hospital London included 106 adults with severe Hayfever followed up for 3 years, 2 years on treatment and 1 year after stopping treatment. In this double-blind trial, 3 randomised groups took sublingual immunotherapy, subcutaneous immunotherapy and placebo treatment. 92 completed the trial. Results showed that 2 years treatment with both modalities did not result in persistent benefit at year 3, although the researchers found that both treatments were effective compared to placebo during years 1 and 2.

Continue reading

Handful of Nuts a Day Can Reduce Chronic Diseases

MedicalResearch.com Interview with:

Dr. Dagfinn Aune Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics School of Public Health Imperial College London St. Mary's Campus London  UK

Dr. Dagfinn Aune

Dr. Dagfinn Aune
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics
School of Public Health
Imperial College London
St. Mary’s Campus London  UK

MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?

Response: There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that intake of nuts may reduce the risk of coronary heart disease, but the relation between nut intake and other diseases like cancer and stroke, and the relation with mortality and less common causes of death is not clear. Also it is not clear how much nuts are needed to reduce the risk.

So our current meta-analysis reviewed the data from 20 studies (29 publications) on nut intake and different health outcomes. We found that a nut intake of approximately one serving per day (28 g/d or a handful) was associated with a reduced risk of coronary heart disease (by 30%), total cancer (15%), all-cause mortality (22%) and mortality from respiratory disease (50%), diabetes (40%), and infections (75%), although there were few studies in the latter three analyses. We found that most of the benefit was observed up to an intake of around 20 grams per day. Similar results were found for total nuts, tree nuts and peanuts (which are botanically defined as legumes), but peanuts were also associated with reduced risk of stroke, while only tree nuts were associated with reduced cancer risk. We also calculated the number of deaths that potentially could be avoided, under the assumption that the observed associations are causal, and arrived at 4.4 million deaths in North and South America, Europe, Southeast Asia and the Western Pacific (unfortunately we did not have data on nut intake from West Asia and Africa so we were not able to include those areas).

Continue reading

Cancer Drugs, Survival and Ethics

MedicalResearch.com Interview with:

Peter Wise MD Charing Cross Hospital and Imperial College School of Medicine London, UK

Dr. Peter Wise

Peter Wise MD
Charing Cross Hospital and
Imperial College School of Medicine
London, UK

MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this analysis?

Response: As a medical ethicist, I wished to know how much patients with advanced – metastatic – cancer knew about the drugs that were being used to treat it. What were their perceptions of likely treatment success and how did that tally with our knowledge of what drugs could actually achieve – and at what cost to the body and to the pocket. Did patients actually have a choice – and how did the drugs get approved for use in the first place?

Continue reading

New Ibuprofen Formulation May Avoid Cardiac Side Effects

MedicalResearch.com Interview with:

Dr Nicholas Kirkby BHF Intermediate Fellow | Vascular Biology National Heart & Lung Institute | Imperial College London London

Dr Nicholas Kirkby

Dr Nicholas Kirkby
BHF Intermediate Fellow | Vascular Biology
National Heart & Lung Institute | Imperial College London
London

MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?

Response: We know drugs like ibuprofen, called ‘non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs’ cause an increase in the risk of heart attacks. These side effects cause very real concerns for the many millions of people who rely on them. They are also the reason why there are no new drugs in this class and why they have been withdrawn (2011) for use as a preventative treatment for colon cancer. Previous research from our group suggests that L-arginine supplements may prevent the cardiovascular side effects caused by these drugs. Our findings here suggest that a particular formulations of ibuprofen, called ibuprofen arginate, which is already available in many parts of the world, can act like an L-arginine supplement and that this could potentially protect the cardiovascular system.

Continue reading

Digital Mobile Technology Gives Some Arm Function To Stroke Patients

MedicalResearch.com Interview with:

Dr Paul Bentley MA MRCP PhD Clinical Senior Lecturer in Clinical Neuroscience Honorary Consultant Neurologist Neurology Dept Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust Charing Cross Hospital London

Dr Paul Bentley

Dr Paul Bentley MA MRCP PhD
Clinical Senior Lecturer in Clinical Neuroscience
Honorary Consultant Neurologist
Neurology Dept
Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust
Charing Cross Hospital
London

MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?

Response: gripAble was designed to help people with arm disability practise physiotherapy when a physiotherapist is not available, or in between physiotherapy sessions. We know that the amount of physiotherapy provision in the UK, after stroke or arm injury, is typically below that which is recommended by professional bodies. Furthermore, increasing research suggests that higher-intensity training can boost functional outcomes. The innovation was designed to help people with a range of disabilities including severe paralysis engage with computer games with their weak arm. At the same time its designed to be portable for use at home or in bed, and low-cost.

gripAble also enables remote measurement and monitoring of arm function, by setting users a series of calibrated tasks played out on the tablet screen. This way doctors and physiotherapists can assess the needs of a patient, and gain an idea of how well a patient is responding to home physiotherapy.

Continue reading

People In Most Countries Have Gotten Taller Over Last Century

MedicalResearch.com Interview with:

Prof. Majid Ezzati, PhD Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health Chair in Global Environmental Health Imperial College, London Adjunct Professor of Global Health and Department of Global Health and Population Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health

Prof. Majid Ezzati

Prof. Majid Ezzati, PhD
Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health
Chair in Global Environmental Health
Imperial College, London
Adjunct Professor of Global Health and
Department of Global Health and Population
Harvard T.H. Chan
School of Public Health

MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?

Response: Human height is strongly influenced by the environment that we grow up in, from pregnancy through to late adolescence. If we have good nutrition, few illnesses and good healthcare, we are more likely to grow taller. In turn, height has a strong effect on our health in adulthood. Taller people on average live longer, have lower risk of heart disease (although they do have slightly elevated risks of some cancers).

We have collated the largest-ever database of height. We analysed 1472 studies with measured height on 18.6 million individuals. We made estimates of height for 18-year-old men and women from 1914 and 2014. Height has increased in every country in the world, but this has been very uneven. The tallest men in the world are now the Dutch, and the tallest women are the Latvians. The countries that have seen the most growth are South Korea for women and Iran for men. We have seen large increases in height in East Asia, and stagnation in much of the West over the last few decades. In parts of Africa height has actually decreased by 5-10 cm over this period.

Continue reading

Role of microRNAs in Driving Breast and Lung Cancer Metastases Identified

MedicalResearch.com Interview with:

Dr Olivier E Pardo PhD Team Leader Imperial College Division of Cancer Hammersmith Hospital London UK

Dr. Olivier Pardo

Dr Olivier E Pardo PhD
Team Leader
Imperial College
Division of Cancer
Hammersmith Hospital
London UK 

MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?

Dr. Pardo: Metastatic dissemination, the ability of tumour cells to go and colonise organs distant from the primary disease site, is the principal cause for failing to cure patients with cancer. This is particularly true in the case of breast cancer where resection of local disease offers good chances of cure but metastatic dissemination that may appear at a later stage carries very poor prognosis. Surgical resection is also the only true curative strategy for localised lung cancer. Hence, a better understanding of the mechanisms controlling the dissemination of tumour cells is likely to propose novel targets for combination therapy that will improve the survival of cancer patients.

Here, we showed that an enzyme, named MARK4, controls the ability of lung and breast cancer cells to move and invade. When we lower MARK4 levels, it prevents cancer cells from moving by changing their internal architecture, making them unfit to invade. Consequently, these cells were unable to efficiently form metastasis in mouse cancer models. Confirming the role of this enzyme in cancer, we show that breast and lung cancer patients with increased levels of MARK4 in their tumours have poorer prognosis.

We found that what controls the levels of MARK4 in cells is miR-515-5p, a small oligonucleotide sequence called a microRNA. When present in the cells, miR-515-5p prevents the expression of MARK4. Incidentally, the loss of miR-515-5p correlates with increased metastasis and poorer prognosis in mouse cancer models and patients, respectively.

Continue reading