A reliable EHR is designed to protect data and ensure data accuracy. When evaluating EHR systems, prioritize the one that...
A reliable EHR is designed to protect data and ensure data accuracy. When evaluating EHR systems, prioritize the one that...
Freepix image[/caption]
Family medicine is busy every single day. Patients come in with many concerns at once. Notes must be written for every visit. Follow-ups need to be clear and complete. This work takes a lot of time. Medical Documentation Automation is starting to make this easier.
Freepik image[/caption]
Photo by Anna Tarazevich[/caption]
The healthcare industry in New York City has always been bustling, but recently, there has been an increasing demand for medical scribes. As the medical field becomes more technology-driven and physicians face more administrative burdens, medical scribes have become essential in maintaining efficiency and improving patient care. In this article, we’ll explore the growing demand for medical scribe jobs in New York City, why now is the perfect time to pursue this career, and what opportunities lie ahead for aspiring medical scribes.
In the last decade, the healthcare sector has evolved to rely heavily on electronic health records (EHRs) and other digital tools. While these tools enhance the quality of care and streamline administrative processes, they also add a layer of complexity to physicians’ day-to-day responsibilities. Doctors now spend a significant portion of their time documenting patient interactions, which can detract from time spent with patients.
This is where medical scribes come into play. Medical scribes help alleviate the burden on healthcare professionals by documenting patient visits in real-time, allowing physicians to focus more on patient care. The demand for medical scribes has soared in recent years due to the increasing need for EHRs, regulatory requirements, and the drive to enhance overall healthcare efficiency.
New York City, with its dense population and vast network of healthcare facilities, has seen a spike in job openings for medical scribes. The need for these professionals is expected to grow even further as more hospitals, clinics, and private practices recognize the critical role that medical scribes play in optimizing healthcare delivery.
Photo by Antoni Shkraba Studio[/caption]
For healthcare providers, managed service providers (MSPs), and other agencies serving medical clients, white-label HIPAA solutions offer the perfect balance of compliant technology under your brand while we handle the complex compliance requirements behind the scenes. Think of it as purchasing a professionally built house that you can customize with your branding, with critical compliance structures already in place.
This guide showcases seven proven platforms that deliver real results in healthcare environments, breaking down costs, features, and compatibility with different business models. No theoretical comparisons, just practical insights from organizations already using these tools to successfully serve healthcare clients.
Photo By: Kaboompics.com[/caption]
Healthcare professionals face increasing demands, with extensive documentation requirements significantly impacting their workflow and patient interactions. Administrative tasks, particularly medical documentation and SOAP notes creation, consume valuable time that could be better allocated to patient care. Emerging technologies, such as AiSOAP, leverage artificial intelligence (AI) to address this challenge, streamlining processes and enhancing productivity and patient outcomes.
This article explores how AI-driven solutions like AiSOAP are reshaping medical documentation, highlighting benefits, real-world applications, and future implications for healthcare practices.
Aside from patient care on an individual basis, EHR data analytics also revolutionizes population health management. Through the review of...
Physician burnout is a growing crisis in the healthcare industry, with many doctors facing overwhelming workloads, excessive administrative burdens, and emotional exhaustion. According to recent studies, nearly 50% of physicians experience symptoms of burnout, leading to reduced job satisfaction, increased medical errors, and even early retirement. Fortunately, advances in healthcare technology are helping to alleviate these stressors, allowing doctors to focus more on patient care rather than paperwork.
Let's explore how modern healthcare technology is playing a crucial role in reducing physician burnout and improving overall well-being for healthcare providers.
Pexels Image[/caption]
The healthcare industry has seen significant change recently as more focus is on offering people more easily available and more effective medical treatments. Sometimes, a patient's capacity to get quick treatment is hampered because, in the past, medical attention required appointments that took a lot of time, long waiting times and frequent in-person visits. On the other hand, developments in healthcare solutions have streamlined the patient experience and guaranteed that people obtain high-quality medical treatment with the least disturbance.
Building medical care accessibility and convenience
Geography, mobility issues, or hectic schedules often make it difficult for patients to access medical treatments. Technology-driven healthcare solutions have significantly reduced these barriers by enabling remote consultations, online prescriptions, and timely treatments. Eliminating logistical challenges ensures that modern healthcare systems allow people to seek medical attention without disrupting their daily routines. This shift toward convenience particularly benefits patients with chronic conditions, who require ongoing care but may find frequent clinic or hospital visits challenging. Online providers such as Anytime Doctor are very important in ensuring patients get competent and timely treatment free from needless waits, optimising access to medical care. As digital healthcare develops, these developments will increase patient outcomes, improve accessibility, and redefine medical treatment.
Photo by Pavel Danilyuk[/caption]
Rethink Your Digital Front Door
If you’re thinking, “We have a website; we’re good,” you’re already behind. Patients aren’t just stumbling onto your practice anymore—they’re shopping for care like they shop for shoes: scrolling through reviews, comparing options, and judging whether you’re worth their time (and money) before they even pick up the phone.
Your digital presence is your front door, and it’s not just about looking professional—it’s about feeling approachable. Think user-friendly scheduling where no one has to dig through four menus just to find an open slot. Think virtual check-in that cuts out that awkward clipboard shuffle in the waiting room. Think SEO that makes your practice pop up when someone searches for “best pediatrician near me” at 2 a.m.
Every friction point—every glitchy “Contact Us” form or slow-to-load page—is sending patients straight to the next provider in their search results. Digital-first convenience isn’t a luxury anymore. It’s a dealbreaker.
Prof. Adam RoseIntegrated within a hospital’s Computerized Physician Order Entry system or not, pharmacy management systems play a critical role in healthcare...
Photo by luis gomes[/caption]
With medical needs escalating and technology advancing at an incredible pace, the speed of patient care is about to become much faster and more effective. Healthcare organizations are under pressure to do more with less. Businesses are finally able to leave their tech logjam behind when they plug into lean IT project services. Suddenly, the thorny vines of procedure fall away, and genuine innovation gets a second wind. Low costs don't mean low-quality care.. What if healthcare operations could run like a well-oiled machine? For that to happen, they need to corral their IT projects, but that's a tall order given the specific challenges they face.
Photo by Tima Miroshnichenko[/caption]
In today’s healthcare environment, safeguarding patient data is a core responsibility. As technology continues to integrate into healthcare systems, from Electronic Health Records (EHR) to remote patient monitoring, organizations must address cybersecurity threats effectively. This article explains how advanced network solutions can strengthen patient data security, ensuring compliance and trust.
Source[/caption]
Key Takeaways:
Dr. McPeek Hinz[/caption]
Eugenia McPeek Hinz MD MS FAMIA
Associate CMIO - DHTS
Duke University Health System
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Clinician burnout rates have hovered around 50% for much of the past decade. Burnout is a significant concern in healthcare for its effects on care givers and associated downstream adverse implications on patient care for quality and safety. The ubiquitous presence of Electronic Health Records (EHR) along with the increased clerical components and after hours use has been a significant concern for contributing to provider burnout.
Dr. Traverso[/caption]
Carlo Giovanni Traverso, MB, BChir, PhD
Associate Physician, Brigham and Women's Hospital
Assistant Professor,
[caption id="attachment_56823" align="alignleft" width="150"]
Dr. Chai[/caption]
Peter R. Chai, MD, MMS
Emergency Medicine Physician and Medical Toxicologist
Harvard Medical School
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Department of Medicine
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are some of the functions that Dr. Spot can facilitate?
Response: During the COVID-19 pandemic, we wanted to consider innovative methods to provide additional social distance for physicians evaluating low acuity individuals who may have COVID-19 disease in the emergency department. While other health systems had instituted processes like evaluating patients from outside of emergency department rooms or calling patients to obtain a history, we considered the use of a mobile robotic system in collaboration with Boston Dynamics to provide telemedicine triage on an agile platform that could be navigated around a busy emergency department. Dr. Spot was built with a camera system to help an operator navigate it through an emergency department into a patient room where an on-board tablet would permit face-to-face triage and assessment of individuals.
Dr. Latulipe[/caption]
Celine Latulipe PhD
Associate Professor
University of Manitoba
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: We wanted to find out how many hospitals offer proxy accounts for caregivers of adult patients. Most patient portal systems allow proxy accounts for parents of pediatric patients, so we know the underlying systems support the creation of proxy accounts. When we were starting this research, the two big healthcare systems where I was located did NOT offer such proxy accounts for caregivers of adult patients, and a staff person at one of those hospitals suggested adult patients share their passwords with their caregiver, if the caregiver needed access to the portal.
As a computer scientist, I am well aware of the security and privacy risks associated with password sharing, and I was appalled by this advice. So we did this survey across the US and we found that 45% of the staff contacted in our study gave similar password sharing advice. This is hugely problematic. Caregivers using a patient's password means the caregiver can see everything in the medical record, including things the patient might not want the caregiver to know, such as past diagnoses of stigmatized illnesses, substance abuse or reproductive health decisions. Also, because password re-use is common across systems, a caregiver with a patient's portal password may now have access to the patient's online banking.
Dr. Bishnoi[/caption]
Rohit Bishnoi, M.D.
Division of Hematology and Oncology
Department of Medicine
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: National Healthcare expenditure was $3.6 trillion in 2018 and 17.7% of Gross Domestic Product. Redundant laboratory testing is one part of this problem that is more pronounced in hospitalized patients as they are often seen by multiple physicians from the time of admission till discharge. This added burden on the US health care system leads to increased costs, decreased patient satisfaction, and unnecessary phlebotomy. It also leads to iatrogenic anemia over time and unnecessary transfusions. The Choosing Wisely initiative recommendation from the Society of Hospital Medicine, Society for the Advancement of Blood Management, and the Critical Care Societies Collaborative have recommended avoiding repetitive labs.
As one of the physicians in the division of hospital medicine at the University of Florida (UF) Health Shands hospital, we encountered this problem frequently where a patient will get multiple HbA1c or lipid profiles or iron studies during the same hospital stay without any clear clinical indication. Most often these tests were ordered by different physicians seeing the same patient and not realizing that either the test has already been ordered or sometimes it is related to practice pattern of physicians. We often heard complaints about this from our nursing and laboratory staff and, most importantly by patients themselves.
Dr. Fanaroll[/caption]
Alexander C. Fanaroff, MD, MHS
Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
University of Pennsylvania
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: This is a secondary analysis of the ARTEMIS, a cluster randomized trial of copayment assistance for P2Y12 inhibitors in patients that had myocardial infarction. One of the primary endpoints of ARTEMIS was persistence with P2Y12 inhibitors: Did the patient continue to take a P2Y12 inhibitor over the entire 1 year following MI? In ARTEMIS, we captured persistence data in two ways, patient report and pharmacy fill records. What we did in this study was to look at the agreement between persistence as measured by these two methods.
Dr. Jiang[/caption]
John (Xuefeng) Jiang PhD
Professor and Plante Moran Faculty Fellow
Eli Broad College of Business
Accounting & Information Systems
Michigan State University
East Lansing, MI
MedicalResearch.com: How did you get interested in this issue?
Response: This is the third project of our data breach trilogy. We first examined which healthcare providers (focusing on hospitals) more likely suffer from a data breach. We documented large hospitals, despite their resources, are more likely to experience a data breach. Some hospitals experienced multiple incidents (https://jamanetwork.altmetric.com/details/18464149).
The findings made us wonder what happened? Besides size, what other factors contribute to data breaches? Based on detailed event descriptions, we documented the circumstances under which each data breach occurred (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/article-abstract/2715158).
We found more than half of data breaches could be attributed to healthcare providers’ internal mistakes or negligence (e.g., forgot to encrypt laptop computers, used cc instead of bcc in emailing patients, didn’t revoke former employees’ login credentials after employment terminated) rather than external forces (e.g., hacking). We also found mobile devices (e.g. laptop computers, usb drives) are associated with most data breaches than paper records or network servers. Our results suggest if healthcare providers strengthen their internal control and limit the use of mobile device might be effective ways to reduce data breach risks.
Dr. Tai-Seale[/caption]
Ming Tai-Seale, PhD, MPH
Professor
Department of Family Medicine and Public Health
University of California San Diego School of Medicine
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: The electronic health record (EHR) potentially creates a 24/7 work environment for physicians. Its impact on physicians’ wellness has become a challenge for most health care delivery organizations. Understanding the relationships between physicians’ well-being and “desktop medicine”1 work in the EHR and work environment is critical if burnout is to be addressed more effectively.
Dr. McCarty[/caption]
Cari McCarty, PhD
Research Professor, UW
Investigator, Seattle Children’s Research Institute
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Adolescence is a time when teens begin to take charge of their health, but it is also a time when they can be prone to health risk behaviors, such as insufficient physical activity, poor sleep, and substance use. We were interested in whether using an electronic health risk screening tool in primary care settings could improve healthcare and health for adolescents. The tool was designed to provide screening as well as motivational feedback directly to adolescents, in addition to clinical decision support for the healthcare clinician. We conducted a trial with 300 adolescent patients where one group received the screening tool prior to their health checkup, and the other group received usual care.
Dr. Cykert[/caption]
Samuel Cykert, MD
Professor of Medicine and Director of the Program on Health and Clinical Informatics
UNC School of Medicine, and
Associate Director for Medical Education, NC AHEC Program
Chapel Hill, NC
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Reports going as far back as the early 1990’s through reports published very recently show that Black patients with early stage, curable lung cancer are not treated with aggressive, curative treatments as often as White patients. These type of results have been shown in other cancers also. It’s particularly important for lung cancer because over 90% of these patients are dead within 4 years if left untreated. In 2010, our group published a study in the Journal of the American Medical Association that showed that Black patients who had poor perceptions of communication (with their provider), who did not understand their prognosis with vs. without treatment, and who did not have a regular source of care ( a primary care doctor) were much less likely to get curative surgery. Also our results suggested that physicians who treated lung cancer seemed less willing to take the risk of aggressive treatments in treating Black patients (who they did not identify with as well) who had other significant illnesses.
Because of the persisting disparities and our 2010 findings, we worked with a community group, the Greensboro Health Disparities Collaborative to consider potential solutions. As these omissions were not overt or intentional because of race on the part of the patients or doctors, we came up with the idea that we needed transparency to shine light on treatment that wasn’t progressing and better communication to ensure that patients were deciding on good information and not acting on mistrust or false beliefs. We also felt the need for accountability – the care teams needed to know how things were going with patients and they needed to know this according to race. To meet these specifications, we designed a system that received data from electronic health records about patients’ scheduled appointments and procedures. If a patient missed an appointment this umbrella system triggered a warning. When a warning was triggered, a nurse navigator trained specially on communication issues, re-engaged the patient to bring him/her back into care. In the system, we also programmed the timing of expected milestones in care, and if these treatment milestones were not reached in the designated time frame, a physician leader would re-engage the clinical team to consider the care options.
Using this system that combined transparency through technology, essentially our real time warning registry, and humans who were accountable for the triggered warnings, care improved for both Black and White patients and the treatment disparity for Black patients was dramatically reduced. In terms of the numbers, at baseline, before the intervention, 79% of White patients completed treatment compared to 69% of Black patients. For the group who received the intervention, the rate of completed treatment for White patients was 95% and for Black patients 96.5%.
Dr. Phillips[/caption]
Katharine Phillips, M.D.
Professor of Psychiatry
DeWitt Wallace Senior Scholar
Residency Research Director
Department of Psychiatry
Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University
Attending Psychiatrist, New York-Presbyterian Hospital
Adjunct Professor of Psychiatry and Human Behavior
Alpert Medical School of Brown University
Weill Cornell Psychiatry Specialty Center
Weill Cornell Medicine I NewYork-Presbyterian
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Gardner[/caption]
Rebekah L Gardner MD
Associate Professor of Medicine
Warren Alpert Medical School
Brown University
Providence, Rhode Island
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Burnout profoundly affects physicians, their patients, and the health care system.The role of technology in physician burnout, specifically health information technology (HIT), is not as well characterized as some of the other factors. We sought to understand how stress related to HIT use predicts burnout among physicians.
Our main findings are that 70% of electronic health record (EHR) users reported HIT-related stress, with the highest prevalence in primary care-oriented specialties. We found that experiencing HIT-related stress independently predicted burnout in these physicians, even accounting for other characteristics like age, gender, and practice type. In particular, those with time pressures for documentation or those doing excessive “work after work” on their EHR at home had approximately twice the odds of burnout compared to physicians without these challenges. We found that physicians in different specialties had different rates of stress and burnout.
Dr. Vinson[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
David R. Vinson, MD
Department of Emergency Medicine
Kaiser Permanente Sacramento Medical Center Sacramento, CA
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: At least one-third of emergency department (ED) patients with acute blood clots in the lung, or pulmonary embolism (PE), are eligible for expedited discharged to home, either directly from the ED or after a short (<24 hour) period of observation. Yet in in most hospitals in the U.S. and around the world nearly all ED patients with acute PE are hospitalized. These unnecessary hospitalizations are a poor use of health care resources, tie up inpatient beds, and expose patients to the cost, inconvenience, and risk of inpatient care. The better-performing medical centers have two characteristics in common: they help their physicians identify which PE patients are candidates for outpatient care and they facilitate timely post-discharge follow-up. At Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), we have had the follow-up system in place for some time, but didn’t have a way to help our physicians sort out which patients with acute PE would benefit from home management.
To correct this, we designed a secure, web-based clinical decision support system that was integrated with the electronic health record. When activated, it presented to the emergency physician the validated PE Severity Index, which uses patient demographics, vital signs, examination findings, and past medical history to classify patients into different risk strata, correlated with eligibility for home care. To make use of the PE Severity Index easier and more streamlined for the physician, the tool drew in information from the patient’s comprehensive medical records to accurately auto-populate the PE Severity Index. The tool then calculated for the physician the patient’s risk score and estimated 30-day mortality, and also offered a site-of-care recommendation, for example, “outpatient management is often possible.” The tool also reminded the physician of relative contraindications to outpatient management. At the time, only 10 EDs in KPNC had an on-site physician researcher, who for this study served as physician educator, study promotor, and enrollment auditor to provide physician-specific feedback. These 10 EDs functioned as the intervention sites, while the other 11 EDs within KPNC served as concurrent controls. Our primary outcome was the percentage of eligible ED patients with acute PE who had an expedited discharge to home, as defined above.
During the 16-month study period (8-month pre-intervention and 8-months post-intervention), we cared for 1,703 eligible ED patients with acute PE. Adjusted home discharge increased at intervention sites from 17% to 28%, a greater than 60% relative increase. There were no changes in home discharge observed at the control sites (about 15% throughout the 16-month study). The increase in home discharge was not associated with an increase in short-term return visits or major complications.