22 Jun Does Ozempic Protect Bones? New Real-World Data Suggests Semaglutide Reduces Fracture Risk in Type 2 Diabetes
Semaglutide Linked to Fewer Bone Fractures Despite Greater Weight Loss in Type 2 Diabetes
Dr. Norena Velasquez[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Jairo Norena Velasquez, MD
Associate Division Chief, Endocrinology Division
Alameda Health System
Oakland, California
Response: Type 2 diabetes is associated with a paradoxically elevated fracture risk — up to three times higher than the general population — despite normal or even elevated bone mineral density. The underlying problem is poor bone quality driven by chronic hyperglycemia, advanced glycation end-product accumulation, and increased cortical porosity. Compounding this, intentional weight loss — a cornerstone of diabetes treatment — can accelerate bone loss by reducing mechanical loading on the skeleton.
Semaglutide is one of the most effective weight-loss agents available, yet direct real-world comparisons of its skeletal effects against other active weight-loss therapies were lacking.
Using the Atropos Health Eos EHR database — 161 million US patients from 2016 to 2023 — we compared fracture incidence and BMI change in adults with type 2 diabetes initiating semaglutide versus dulaglutide, phentermine/topiramate, or bupropion/naltrexone, using high-dimensional propensity score matching (17,506 pairs per group).
Semaglutide was associated with greater weight loss (mean delta BMI −1.9 vs. −1.2 kg/m²; difference −0.72 kg/m², p < 0.001) and a 15% reduction in fracture incidence (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77–0.93; p < 0.001) over a mean follow-up of 3.6 years.
Dr. LeBoff[/caption]
Meryl S. LeBoff, MD
Dr. Manson[/caption]
JoAnn E. Manson, MD, DrPH
Professor, Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School Of Public Health
Michael and Lee Bell Professor of Women's Health, Medicine, Harvard Medical School
Chief, Preventive Medicine, Brigham And Women's Hospital
Co-Director, Womens Health, Brigham And Women's Hospital
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Osteoporosis is a major public health problem. Although supplemental vitamin D has been widely used to reduce the risk of fractures in the general population, studies of the effects of vitamin D on fractures, the most important bone health outcome, have been conflicting.
Randomized controlled trials, the highest quality studies, from around the world have shown benefit, no effect, or even harm of supplemental vitamin D on risk of fractures. Some of the trials used bolus dosing, had small samples sizes or short study duration, and co-administered calcium. No large RCTS of this scale tested whether daily supplemental vitamin D (without co-administration with calcium) prevented fractures in the US population.
To fill these knowledge gaps, we tested the hypothesis in this ancillary study to VITAL, whether daily supplemental vitamin D3 reduced the risk of incident total, non-spine and hip fractures in women and men in the US.
Christos V. Chalitsios[/caption]
Christos Chalitsios B.Sc, M.Sc PhD student
Funded by British Medical Association (BMA)
School of Medicine
Division of Respiratory Medicine
University of Nottingham
City Hospital,Nottingham
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Inhaled (ICS) and oral (OCS) corticosteroids play a crucial role in the control of airway inflammation in asthma. Given that the use of ICS in asthma is likely to increase with the recent change in GINA guidance recommending combined long-acting-β2-agonists with ICS at step 1 and the upward trend in prescribing of OCS, we sought to clarify the link between steroids, osteoporosis and FF in patients with asthma, stratifying the risk by dose, number of courses and type of steroids. The prevalence of patients receiving at least one bisphosphonate was also calculated.









