17 Jun Designing Radiopharmaceutical Studies for IND-Enabling Success: What Regulators Expect
[caption id="attachment_74343" align="aligncenter" width="500"]
Pexels[/caption]
Preclinical Studies with Radiopharmaceuticals: IND-Enabling Guidance and Study Design
Introduction
Preclinical evaluation is an integral part of the development of investigational new drugs (IND), including radiopharmaceuticals. Radiopharmaceuticals are radio-labelled formulations used for diagnostic, therapeutic, and disease monitoring purposes within the context of both nuclear medicine and pharmaceutical research. While diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals are used to image organ function, trace biological processes, and quantify metabolism or IND target engagement, therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals are typically used in the field of oncology, whereby ionising radiation of a conjugated radionuclide induces targeted cell death. Because radiopharmaceuticals require the use of radioactive compounds, regulatory bodies such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) require stringent controls around their development, manufacturing, handling, transport, and use. This article will consider guidance specifically surrounding the development of preclinical radiopharmaceutical research studies, considering imaging requirements, dosimetry, and toxicology, and highlighting how sponsors can enable IND success through partnership with a preclinical imaging provider experienced in nuclear medicine.
Maintaining elderly oral health is important part of healthy aging. Many older adults depend on dentures for daily comfort, during speak and eating. An
Image source: Envato[/caption]
A patient receives lab results from their doctor. The results are within normal ranges, and for many people, the conversation about their lab panel ends there. But normal on a standard lab report does not mean optimal, and the gap between those two things is where a significant amount of early metabolic dysfunction goes undetected.
Researchers and clinicians working in preventive and functional medicine have been examining how conventional reference ranges are constructed, what they actually measure, and whether they reliably catch early-stage dysfunction before it progresses to diagnosable disease. Practitioners in the field of
Photo by