Author Interviews, JAMA, Lipids, Pediatrics / 10.08.2016
US Task Force Reviews Lipid Screening For Children and Adolscents
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
[caption id="attachment_26893" align="alignleft" width="142"]
Dr. Paula Lozano[/caption]
Paula Lozano, MD MPH
Associate Medical Director, Research and Translation
Group Health Physicians
Senior Investigator
Group Health Research Institute
Metropolitan Park East
Seattle, WA 98101
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: This wasn’t a study, but rather a study of studies, to support the US Preventive Services Task Force in updating its previous recommendation of
I: insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms. We conducted two systematic evidence reviews of screening children and adolescents:
1. for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH, a genetic disorder that interferes with the body’s ability to metabolize cholesterol and can result in early coronary heart disease); and
2. for multifactorial dyslipidemia—which we defined as elevated LDL cholesterol or total cholesterol, not caused by familial hypercholesterolemia. LDL and total cholesterol were of interest because they are considered atherogenic.
One of the challenges of lipid screening in youth is that blood levels of these atherogenic lipids are known to fluctuate during the course of childhood and adolescence. It’s sort of a W-shaped curve, with a peak at age 9-11 years. So for a given child, the definition of what’s an elevated LDL or total cholesterol level will change with age. Also, two-thirds of kids identified as having high cholesterol through universal screening would not go on to have high cholesterol as adults.
Dr. Paula Lozano[/caption]
Paula Lozano, MD MPH
Associate Medical Director, Research and Translation
Group Health Physicians
Senior Investigator
Group Health Research Institute
Metropolitan Park East
Seattle, WA 98101
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: This wasn’t a study, but rather a study of studies, to support the US Preventive Services Task Force in updating its previous recommendation of
I: insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms. We conducted two systematic evidence reviews of screening children and adolescents:
1. for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH, a genetic disorder that interferes with the body’s ability to metabolize cholesterol and can result in early coronary heart disease); and
2. for multifactorial dyslipidemia—which we defined as elevated LDL cholesterol or total cholesterol, not caused by familial hypercholesterolemia. LDL and total cholesterol were of interest because they are considered atherogenic.
One of the challenges of lipid screening in youth is that blood levels of these atherogenic lipids are known to fluctuate during the course of childhood and adolescence. It’s sort of a W-shaped curve, with a peak at age 9-11 years. So for a given child, the definition of what’s an elevated LDL or total cholesterol level will change with age. Also, two-thirds of kids identified as having high cholesterol through universal screening would not go on to have high cholesterol as adults.



Maayan Yitshak Sade[/caption]
Maayan Yitshak Sade MPH
Chief Scientific Officer
Clinical Research Center,
Soroka University Medical Center, Israel and
[caption id="attachment_24725" align="alignleft" width="125"]
Dr. Victor Novack[/caption]
Victor Novack, MD, PhD
Soroka University Medical Center and Ben-Gurion University in Beer Sheva, Israel
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Numerous studies found association between exposure the air pollution and increased risk of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. In recent years links were found between air pollution and diabetes as well. The scientific evidence supports a causal association between air pollution and oxidative stress, possibly involving impaired metabolism of glucose and lipids. In a recent study performed by our group, we observed a significantly increased risk for ischemic stroke among young adults, associated with air pollution exposure. Following these findings, and as a part of the possible theory linking the association air pollution exposure and cardiovascular diseases, we sought to investigate if this association might be mediated through the well-established cardiovascular risk factors such as abnormal lipid and glucose metabolism.
Dr. Michael Miller[/caption]
Michael Miller, MD, FACC, FAHA
Professor of Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology & Public Health
University of Maryland School of Medicine
Staff Physician, Baltimore VAMC
Director, Center for Preventive Cardiology
University of Maryland Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Miller: It has become an article of faith that HDL (the good cholesterol) is an independent risk factor for heart disease. However, previous studies did not examine the importance of HDL after accounting for both LDL (bad cholesterol) and triglycerides (blood fats). This is important because HDL is associated with LDL and triglycerides. We hypothesized that if HDL is truly an independent risk factor, then low HDL levels in isolation would continue to be linked to an increased risk of heart disease while high HDL levels would continue to protect the heart even if LDL and triglycerides levels were elevated.
Dr. Martha Rumore[/caption]
Martha M. Rumore, PharmD, JD, MS, LLM, FAPhA
Associate Professor, Social, Behavioral & Administrative Pharmacy
Touro College of Pharmacy
New York, NY 10027
& Of Counsel Sorell, Lenna, & Schmidt, LLP
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Rumore: The management of lipid therapy is only one component that affects overall cardiovascular outcomes.This study is one of the first to look at the benefits of dose titration versus intensity-based statin therapy. To evaluate whether patients titrated on statin therapy using ATPIII algorithm with an LDL goal of <100mg/dL also met the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline for Management of Blood Cholesterol goal of ≥40% LDL reduction from baseline compared to inpatients initiated on high-moderate intensity statin (HIS). Other objectives included comparison of algorithms to lower LDL ≥40%, final dose, adverse drug events (ADEs), clinic visits to goal, and cardiovascular event occurrence.
MedicalResearch.com: What are the main findings?
Dr. Rumore: 981 patients were included- 43% were titrated and 57% achieved LDL<100; 38% achieved both LDL <100mg/dL and LDL ≥40% reduction; 58% received HIS and 53% achieved LDL <100; 43% achieved both LDL <100mg/dL and LDL ≥40% reduction.
Initiating patients on High Intensity statins was not more effective than dose titration in achieving <100mg/dL and ≥40% LDL reduction;X2=0.006,N=159,p=0.938. A 50% LDL reduction in patients that also achieved an LDL <100 was 54% and 48%, in titration and HIS groups, respectively; X2=0.611,N=159,p=0.434. The titration group required an average of 4.3 clinic visits to achieve goal, compared to 3.1 visits for HIS; p=0.309; 95% CI(-1.36,1.06).





Dr. Noriko Osumi[/caption]
Dr. González-Pacheco[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Héctor González-Pacheco MD
Coronary Care Unit, National Institute of Cardiology
Mexico City, Mexico
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. González-Pacheco: Epidemiological studies have provided robust evidence for an inverse correlation between plasma levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and cardiovascular risk. At hospital admission, a high percentage of patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have low HDL-C levels. Currently, the association of very low levels of HDL-C with early mortality in patients with ACS is still a topic of considerable interest. However, the possible mechanisms are not clear. Since an acute coronary syndrome induces an inflammatory response, and several chronic systemic diseases and acute critical illnesses with clear pro-inflammatory components have been associated with significantly reduced HDL-C levels, and investigators have shown an inverse correlation between HDL-C levels and the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, we hypothesized that reduced HDL-C levels in
Dr. Del Gobbo[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Liana Del Gobbo PhD
Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA; and
Life Sciences Research Organization, Bethesda, MD
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Del Gobbo: Accumulating evidence suggests that nut intake lowers risk of cardiovascular disease. But the specific mechanisms by which nuts may exert beneficial effects (eg. through lowering blood cholesterol, blood pressure, inflammation, etc.) were not clear. Two prior reviews on this topic only evaluated one type of nuts, and only a few cardiovascular risk factors.
To address these knowledge gaps, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials to examine the effects of eating tree nuts (walnuts, pistachios, macadamia nuts, pecans, cashews, almonds, hazelnuts, Brazil nuts) on major cardiovascular risk factors including blood lipids (total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, triglycerides [TG]), lipoproteins (ApoA1, ApoB, ApoB100), blood pressure (systolic, SBP; diastolic, DBP), and inflammation (C-reactive protein, CRP) in adults 18 years or older without cardiovascular disease.
A daily serving of nuts (1oz serving, or 28g per day) significantly lowered total cholesterol, LDL, ApoB, and triglycerides, with no significant effects on other risk factors, such as HDL cholesterol, blood pressure or inflammation. To give you an idea of a 1oz serving size of nuts, it is about 23 almonds, 18 cashews, 21 hazelnuts, 6 Brazil nuts, 12 macadamia nuts, 14 walnut halves, 20 pecan halves, 49 pistachios.
We did not see any differences in cholesterol-lowering effects by nut type.









