Author Interviews, Hospital Readmissions, JAMA, Stanford, Surgical Research / 12.06.2015

Jordan M. Cloyd, MD Department of Surgery Stanford University Stanford, CaliforniaMedicalResearch.com Interview with: Jordan M. Cloyd, MD Department of Surgery Stanford University Stanford, California Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Dr. Cloyd: The motivation for the study was that, anecdotally, we had noticed that several of our patients who had been discharged on a weekend required readmission for potentially preventable reasons. We wanted to investigate whether the data supported the idea that weekend discharge was associated with a higher risk of hospital readmission. (more…)
Author Interviews, Brigham & Women's - Harvard, General Medicine, Hospital Readmissions / 11.06.2015

Jeffrey C. Schneider, M.D. Medical Director, Trauma, Burn & Orthopedic Program Assistant Professor, Dept. of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Harvard Medical School Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Boston, MA 02129MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Jeffrey C. Schneider, M.D. Medical Director, Trauma, Burn & Orthopedic Program Assistant Professor, Dept. of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Harvard Medical School Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Boston, MA 02129 Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Response: Hospitalizations account for the largest share of healthcare costs in the U.S., comprising nearly one-third of all healthcare expenditures.  In 2011, readmissions within 30 days of hospital discharge represented more than $41 billion in hospital costs.  Financial penalties for excess 30-day hospital readmissions were instituted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in 20124; more than 2,200 hospitals were fined a total of $280 million in reduced Medicare payments in fiscal year 2013. Most readmission risk prediction models have targeted specific medical diagnoses and have utilized comorbidities and demographic data as the central risk factors for hospital readmission. Yet, large U.S. administrative datasets have demonstrated poor discriminative ability (c-statistics: 0.55-0.65) in predicting readmissions. However, few studies have considered functional status as potential readmission risk factors. There is increasing evidence that functional status is a good predictor of other health outcomes.  To date, acute care hospital administrative databases do not routinely include functional status measures.  Therefore, inpatient rehabilitation setting is an ideal population in which to examine the impact of functional status on readmission risk, because: (1) inpatient rehabilitation patients often have complex care transitions after acute care discharge, and represent a significant proportion of total readmissions; 2) inpatient rehabilitation facilities routinely document functional status using a valid instrument—the FIM®; and (3) a majority of U.S. IRFs participate in one of the only national datasets that contain standardized functional data—the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation. Limitations of prior work include small and single-center study designs, narrowly defined patient populations, and defining readmissions beyond the 30-day period.  Overall, there is a lack of literature on the utility of function as a readmission predictor in a large population of medical patients. Moreover, function is a modifiable risk factor with potential to impact readmission outcomes if function-based interventions are instituted early. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare functional status with medical comorbidities as predictors of acute care readmissions in the medically complex rehabilitation population. We hypothesized that acute care readmission prediction models based on functional status would outperform models based on comorbidities,and that the addition of comorbidity variables to function-based models would not significantly enhance predictive performance. (more…)
Author Interviews, Outcomes & Safety, Surgical Research / 06.06.2015

Dr. Janet Martin PharmD, PhD Director, Medical Evidence, Decision Integrity & Clinical Impact (MEDICI) Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University London, ON Canada MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Dr. Janet Martin PharmD, PhD Director, Medical Evidence, Decision Integrity & Clinical Impact (MEDICI) Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University London, ON Canada Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Response: There remains some scepticism regarding the effectiveness of the safe surgery checklist (SSCL) to tangibly improve patient safety in the real world setting, especially with respect to relative benefits in high-income versus lower-income settings. In general, push-back has been related to surgical teams doubting the power of a simple checklist to make significant impact for surgical settings. Despite their deceptive simplicity, checklists can be powerful tools to deal with the sheer volume of information that must be addressed in sequence in order to support safe surgery. The objective of our study was to determine, through meta-analysis, whether clinically-relevant outcomes after implementation of the WHO Safe Surgery Checklist (SSCL) in the clinical trial setting and in the real world setting are improved, and whether greater benefit occurs in low-middle income countries (LMICs) than in high income countries (HICs). A total of 13 studies (262,970 patients) met the inclusion criteria, including 12 cohort studies and 1 randomized trial. For SSCL versus control, the odds of death was significantly reduced by 21% (OR 0.79, 95%CI 0.67-0.93; p=0.003). The odds of surgical site infection was reduced by 28% (OR 0.72, 95%CI 0.62-0.84; p=0.001). Similarly, overall postoperative complications were significantly reduced by 30% (OR 0.70, 95%CI 0.59-0.82; p=0.009). While HIC and LMICs both experienced reductions in death, surgical site infections, and overall complications, the magnitude of reduction was generally greater for LMICs than in HICs. Sub-analysis by study design demonstrated generalizability between the clinical trial setting and the real world setting. (more…)
Annals Internal Medicine, Author Interviews, Beth Israel Deaconess, Hospital Readmissions / 04.06.2015

MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Kelly L. Graham, MD, MPH Instructor in Medicine Harvard Medical School Division of General Medicine and Primary Care Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Dr. Graham: 30-day readmissions have become a standard quality metric used to represent inpatient quality of care and unnecessary healthcare utilization.  Effective 10/1/2009, hospitals with excess 30-day readmissions have been faced with financial penalties.  Experts have questioned the validity of this metric, and have raised concerns about the potential unintended consequence of creating health disparities, as critical access hospitals caring for the most socioeconomically burdened patients have faced the highest penalties. We were interested to see if factors associated with readmissions in the early part of the 30 day window (0-7 days post-discharge) differed from those associated with the later window (8-30 days post-discharge), ultimately attempting to better understand the "pathophysiology" of a readmission. Our findings suggest that early readmissions are associated with many factors, including those related to the index admission (acute illness burden and suboptimal discharge timing), and factors that are not related to the index hospitalization, such as chronic illness burden and social determinants of health.  In contrast, late readmissions were only associated with chronic illness burden and social determinants of health. (more…)
Author Interviews, Medical Imaging, Outcomes & Safety, Pulmonary Disease, Radiology / 29.05.2015

Evgeniya Sokolovskaya, DO, MD Monmouth Medical Center Long Branch, NJ 07740.MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Evgeniya Sokolovskaya, DO, MD Monmouth Medical Center Long Branch, NJ 07740. Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Dr. Sokolovskaya: As the utilization of diagnostic imaging has continued to increase in recent years, the workload of radiologists has correspondingly risen. Radiologists are under pressure to increase productivity by increasing workload volume. Previous studies have shown that increasing the number of reporting exams per day can affect the accuracy of radiologic interpretations, increase an error rate and degrade radiologists’ performance in the detection of pathology as viewing time per study decreases. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine if faster reporting speed when reading CT imaging studies of the Abdomen and Pelvis, results in higher number of misses and interpretation errors. The results of our study showed that the number of major misses and interpretation errors significantly increased at the faster reporting speed. (more…)
Author Interviews, BMJ, Emergency Care, Hospital Readmissions / 11.05.2015

dr-brian-roweMedicalResearch.com Interview with: Dr. Brian Rowe, MD, MSc, CCFP(EM), FCCP Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada MedicalResearch: What is the background for this study? Dr. Rowe: Frequent users are also called “familiar faces” or “heavy users” and they represent an important sub-group of patients in the emergency setting, with often complex needs that contribute to overcrowding and excess health care costs. The evidence suggests that frequent users account for up to one in 12 patients seeking emergency care, and for around one in four of all visits. MedicalResearch: What are the main findings? Dr. Rowe: Frequent users of emergency department care are more than twice as likely to die, be admitted to hospital, or require other outpatient treatment as infrequent users, concludes an analysis of the available evidence, published in Emergency Medicine Journal. These conclusions are based on a thorough search of seven electronic databases of relevant research relating to the frequency and outcomes of emergency department use by adults. Out of a total of more than 4000 potential studies, 31 relevant research reports published between 1990 and 2013 were included in the final analysis. Frequent users were variably defined as visiting emergency care departments from four or more times up to 20 times a year. Among the seven studies looking at deaths, the analysis showed that frequent attenders at emergency care departments were more than twice as likely to die as those who rarely sought emergency care. Most of the studies included hospital admission as an outcome, and these showed that frequent users were around 2.5 times as likely to be admitted as infrequent users. Ten studies looked at use of other hospital outpatient care, and these showed that frequent users were more than 2.5 times as likely to require at least one outpatient clinic after their visit to the emergency care department. (more…)
AHA Journals, Author Interviews, Outcomes & Safety, Stroke / 08.05.2015

James S McKinney, MD, FAHAAssistant Professor of Neurology Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Medical Director, RWJUH Comprehensive Stroke Center New Brunswick, NJ 08901MedicalResearch.com Interview with: James S McKinney, MD, FAHA Assistant Professor of Neurology Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Medical Director, RWJUH Comprehensive Stroke Center New Brunswick, NJ 08901 Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Dr. McKinney: The current study evaluated outcomes of patients admitted to New Jersey hospitals with hemorrhagic stroke, including intracerebral hemorrhage (bleeding into the brain) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding along the surface of the brain) between 1996 and 2012 using the Myocardial Infarction Data Acquisition System (MIDAS) administrative database.  The New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services designates certain hospitals as comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs).  We found that patients admitted to comprehensive stroke centers with hemorrhagic stroke were less likely to die than those admitted to other hospital types.  This was particularly true for those patients admitted with subarachnoid hemorrhage, which is usually caused by a ruptured aneurysm. (more…)
Author Interviews, Hospital Readmissions / 27.04.2015

MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Rachel Mosher Henke, Ph.D. Truven Health Analytics Director of Research Cambridge, MA Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Dr. Henke: We wanted to see what percentage of patients return to the same hospital for their readmission.  Hospitals are increasingly at risk for the cost of readmissions through new initiatives, such as bundled payment programs.  If a patient goes to another hospital for their readmission, the original hospital has little control over the decision to admit and the intensity of care provided. We found about three quarters of patients do go back to the same hospital for 30-day readmissions, with some variation in rates by condition.  Patients admitted through the emergency department and patients who live in the same county as the hospital were more likely to return to the same hospital for their readmission. (more…)
Author Interviews, Education, Outcomes & Safety / 27.04.2015

MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Henry J. Michtalik MD, MPH, MHS Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality Baltimore, MarylandMedicalResearch.com Interview with: Henry J. Michtalik MD, MPH, MHS Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality Baltimore, Maryland Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Dr. Michtalik: Current healthcare reform emphasizes providing high-value, evidence-based care.  Compliance with practice guidelines and best-practices remains a challenge in the ever-changing healthcare environment.  Multiple methods are typically used to enhance compliance with these guidelines, including physician education, computerized order entry systems with clinical decision support, provider feedback, and payment incentives.  These strategies are used for many conditions, including heart failure and venous thromboembolism (VTE), blood clots. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of an individualized physician dashboard and pay-for-performance program on improving VTE prophylaxis rates amongst hospitalists.  We performed a retrospective analysis of over 3000 inpatient admissions to a hospitalist service.  We examined the impact of a web-based hospitalist dashboard which provided VTE prophylaxis feedback, both alone and in combination with a pay-for performance program which provided a small financial payment for achieving compliance rates greater than 80%. We found that compliance significantly increased from 86% during baseline to 90% during the dashboard alone phase.  Addition of the pay-for-performance program further increased compliance to 94%.  The fastest improvement occurred during the dashboard only phase.  Annual physician payments ranged from $53 to $1244, with 17 of the 19 payments under $1000. (more…)
Author Interviews, Critical Care - Intensive Care - ICUs, Hand Washing, Hospital Acquired / 25.04.2015

Ojan Assadian, M.D., DTMH Professor for Skin Integrity and Infection Prevention Institute for Skin Integrity and Infection Prevention School of Human & Health Sciences University of Huddersfield Queensgate, Huddersfield UKMedicalResearch.com Interview with: Ojan Assadian, M.D., DTMH Professor for Skin Integrity and Infection Prevention Institute for Skin Integrity and Infection Prevention School of Human & Health Sciences University of Huddersfield Queensgate, Huddersfield UK MedicalResearch: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Prof. Assadian: Although medical gloves serve as an important mechanical barrier to prevent healthcare workers’ hands from getting contaminated with potentially pathogenic microorganisms, their inappropriate and incorrect use may support microbial transmission, eventually resulting in indirect horizontal cross-contamination of other patients. We conducted a clinical study designed to determine the efficacy of a newly developed synthetic antibacterial nitrile medical glove coated with an antiseptic, polyhexamethylen-biguanid hydrochloride (PHMB), on its external surface, and compared this antibacterial glove to an identical non-antibacterial glove in reducing surface contamination after common patient care measures in an intensive care unit. We found significantly lower numbers of bacteria on surfaces after performing typical clinical activities such as intravenous fluid handling, oral toilet, or physiotherapy, if touched with antibacterial gloves. (more…)
Author Interviews, CDC, Hepatitis - Liver Disease, Outcomes & Safety / 22.04.2015

MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Chong-Gee Teo, MD, PhD Chief, Laboratory Branch Division of Viral Hepatitis CDC Medical Research: What is the background for this study? Dr. Teo: Hepatitis C outbreaks in the course of providing healthcare continue to occur. Some happen when hepatitis C virus (HCV) is transmitted to patients following breakdowns in safe injection and infection control practices, and mishaps during surgery. Another route of provider – to patient HCV transmission is diversion, self-injection and substitution of opioids intended for anesthetic use (collectively referred to as “tampering”). A patient acquires infection when an HCV-infected provider, who is an injecting drug user, self-injects from a syringe prefilled with opioid anesthetic, fills the syringe with a volume substitute (e.g., saline or water), and then administers the adulterated preparation to the patient. The study consisted of two parts: 1) to quantify the extent that anesthetic opioid tampering contributes to hepatitis C outbreaks by analyzing healthcare-associated outbreaks occurring between 1990 and 2012 in developed countries. 2) to estimate the probabilities of provider-to-patient transmission reflecting the “real-world” setting in which a patient presents for health care, unaware of risks posed by procedures conducted by a provider who may or may not be an injecting drug user or HCV infected. (more…)
Author Interviews, Hand Washing, Infections / 21.04.2015

dr-erwin-duizer.pngMedicalResearch.com Interview with: Erwin Duizer, PhD Head of section Enteric Viruses Centre for Infectious Diseases Control National Institute for Public Health and the Environment The Netherlands Medical Research: What is the background for this study? Dr. Duizer: Hand hygiene is important for interrupting the transmission chain of viruses through hands. Alcohol-based hand disinfectants are widely used in hospitals and healthcare facilities, due to convenience, rapidity, and broad acceptance by healthcare personnel. The effectiveness of alcohol-based hand disinfectant has been shown for bacteria and enveloped viruses but their effectiveness in reducing transmission of non-enveloped viruses, such as norovirus, is less certain. Therefore we tested, in a joint project of the RIVM and Wageningen University, the virucidal activity of a propanol based product and an ethanol based product in quantitative carrier tests. Additionally, the virus reducing effect of hand washing (according to health care guidelines) and the use the propanol based product was tested in a quantitative finger pad test. (more…)
Author Interviews, End of Life Care, JAMA, Outcomes & Safety / 15.04.2015

Mihaela S Stefan, MD FACP Research Scientist, Center for Quality of Care Research Director of Outpatient Perioperative Clinic and Medical Consultation Program Academic Hospitalist Baystate Medical Center Assistant Professor of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine Springfield MA 01199MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Mihaela S Stefan, MD FACP Research Scientist, Center for Quality of Care Research Director of Outpatient Perioperative Clinic and Medical Consultation Program Academic Hospitalist Baystate Medical Center Assistant Professor of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine Springfield MA 01199 MedicalResearch: What is the background for this study? Dr. Stefan : Mortality rates for patients with pneumonia are publicly reported and are used to evaluate hospital performance. The rates are calculated using Medicare administrative claims data which provide limited insight into severity of illness and comorbidities that may be associated with death. The mortality measure does not take into consideration advance directives or changes in goals of care preferences during hospitalization. MedicalResearch: What are the main findings? Dr. Stefan : In this retrospective chart review of 202 adults who died with a principal diagnosis of pneumonia between January 2008 and December 2012 in 3 hospitals in MA, we assessed the proportion of patients for whom pneumonia was determined to play a major or a minor role in the patient death. Pneumonia was considered a minor cause if the patient had advanced life threatening illnesses and this was found in 82% of the deaths. More than half of the patients were DNR at admission to the hospital. The majority of patients who died were frail elderly with life-threatening conditions who decided to forgo aggressive care at some point during their admission. Only a small fraction of deaths in the pneumonia mortality measure were the direct result of pneumonia. (more…)
Author Interviews, Heart Disease, Imperial College, JAMA, Outcomes & Safety / 01.04.2015

intra-aortic balloon pump, WikipediaMedicalResearch.com Interview with: Sayan Sen, PhD International Centre for Circulatory Health, National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London, United Kingdom Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Dr. Sayan Sen: Intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP) are often used in Acute Myocardial Infarction, particularly in patients with cardiogenic shock. We analysed the available Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) and observational studies, spanning 30 years, to establish the evidence for this use. There is no identifiable group of patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction that have been demonstrated to derive a mortality benefit from insertion of an IABP. The studies, including over 17000 patients, have studied mortality in patients receiving IABP in comparison to mortality of patients that received no IABP in the era of no reperfusion, fibrinolysis and primary percutaneous intervention.  This lack of mortality reduction with IABP in AMI is consistent in patients with and without cardiogenic shock across both RCTs and observational studies; questioning the continued use of this technology in Acute Myocardial Infarction. (more…)
Author Interviews, Hospital Readmissions, Mental Health Research / 26.03.2015

Brian K. Ahmedani, PhD, LMSW Research Scientist Henry Ford Health System Center for Health Policy & Health Services Research Detroit, MI 48202MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Brian K. Ahmedani, PhD, LMSW Research Scientist Henry Ford Health System Center for Health Policy & Health Services Research Detroit, MI 48202 Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Dr. Ahmedani: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have begun penalizing hospitals for excessive all-cause hospital readmissions within 30 days after discharge for pneumonia, heart failure, and myocardial infarction.  We wanted to determine the influence of comorbid mental health and substance use conditions on the rate of 30-day hospital readmissions for individuals with these conditions.  Overall, individuals with a comorbid mental health condition were readmitted to the hospital within 30-days approximately 5% more often than those without one (21.7% versus 16.5%).  Comorbid depression and anxiety were associated with a 30-day readmission rate of more than 23% each, overall. (more…)
Author Interviews, Emergency Care, Outcomes & Safety / 24.03.2015

Michael J. Beck MD, FAAP, SSGB Department of Pediatrics Milton S. Hershey Medical Center and the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Michael J. Beck MD, FAAP, SSGB Department of Pediatrics Milton S. Hershey Medical Center and the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Dr. Beck: Many hospitals are trying to improve patient discharge times. The benefits of this result will improve several valuable metrics within the organization’s value chain, namely improved access, reduced lost referrals, reduce emergency department boarding, to name a few. As our region’s only tertiary care children’s hospital, that serves an expanding demographics and geographic population, access to our facility is becoming both a priority and challenge. Since many hospitals and hence hospital service lines work with a fixed number of beds, serving a growing population is going to lead to or exacerbate hospital access issues and emergency department boarding. The latter of which may carry financial penalties in the future based on Joint Commission standard LD 04.03.01 (revised 2013). We sought to applying elements of Lean and constraint theory, which postulate that flow can be created by eliminating waste, and that a process can move only as fast as its scarcest resource, respectively. From a lean perspective, why should  “dischargeable” patients who were seen on AM work rounds still be occupying a valuable bed at 3 or 4PM when they were deemed safe for discharge hours earlier? Why should patients and organizations continue to tolerate this waste? Applying Lean thinking  forced our service to reconfigure, re-sequence, and re-staff rounds in a way that could better meet patients’ and our organization’s needs and requirements.  Since the discharge process output is an open bed, not having an open bed when it is needed, creates an organizational constraint. One constraint to creating an open bed, is the attending physician, ie a patient cannot be discharged until he/she is seen by the attending physician. However, another constraint is the model that one attending sees in excess of 13 patients per day (patient: provider ratio of 13:1). We hypothesized that by adding an attending  to reduce the  patient: provider ratio by 50% during predictable high volumes, we could do all of the discharge paperwork on rounds, at the time the decision to discharge is made by the attending.  By advancing discharge order entry time, we should be able to advance the time patients get discharged, create an open bed earlier in the day, and ultimately reduce lost referrals and emergency department boarding. Our service line median time of discharge order entry and time of patient discharge was compared to our own historical controls and to the same discharge behaviors of the remainder of our hospital services. The main intervention was staffing reallocation, creation of standard workflow expectations, and a discharge checklist. Finally, we also implemented a discharge huddle to occur before the day of anticipated day discharge. Over the 6 month intervention period, the median time of discharge entry decreased from 2:05PM to 10:45 AM and the median time of patient discharge decreased from 3:58PM to 2:15 PM.  The hospital  control group did not change from baseline. Our LOS went form 3.1 days to 3.0 days, and our 7, 14, and 30 day readmission rates did not increase. Emergency department boarding time was decreased by 30%, and lost referrals decreased 70% during the study period. (more…)
Author Interviews, Electronic Records, Outcomes & Safety / 24.03.2015

Dawn Heisey-Grove, MPH Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Analysis Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Washington, DC 20201MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Dawn Heisey-Grove, MPH Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Analysis Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Washington, DC 20201 Medical Research: What is the background for this study? Response: To complete outbreak investigations and perform tasks geared towards improving the public’s health, public health agencies need clinical information from hospitals and health care providers. Adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) and other health IT has made it possible to shift from time-intensive, paper-based public health reporting to electronic information exchange, which enables sending more complete information to public health agencies faster. Such electronic information exchange with public health agencies is a component of the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program meaningful use attestation process. Hospitals in the first stage of meaningful use must select at least one of three optional public health measures to report: immunization registry reporting, syndromic surveillance reporting, and electronic laboratory results reporting. Hospitals in the second stage of meaningful use are required to report on all three public health measures unless there is a valid exclusion. Medical Research: What are the main findings? Response: Using 2014 data from the Medicare EHR Incentive Program, we found that stage 2 hospitals were electronically reporting to local public health agencies more than stage 1 hospitals. Nationally, almost 75% of stage 2 hospitals were able to report all three measures to public health agencies, compared to only 5% of stage 1 hospitals. Stage 2 hospitals had very high rates for electronic exchange with public health agencies across all three measures. Specifically, immunization registry reporting among stage 2 hospitals was highest at 88%, 85% were electronically submitting lab results, and 75% successfully reported the syndromic surveillance measure. (more…)
Author Interviews, Brigham & Women's - Harvard, Hospital Readmissions / 23.03.2015

Dr. McKinley Glover IV,  MD, MHS                                                                                Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MAMedicalResearch.com Interview with: Dr. McKinley Glover IV,  MD, MHS                                       Department of Radiology Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

MedicalResearch: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Dr. Glover: An increasing number of hospitals and health systems utilize social media as a way to connect with healthcare consumers. The simplicity of social media as a healthcare information resource—in comparison to more challenging and conflicting modes of public reporting of healthcare quality data—may add value for consumers seeking to make healthcare decisions. The correlation between ratings on social media and more conventional hospital quality metrics remains largely unclear, raising concern that healthcare consumers may make decisions on inaccurate or inappropriate information regarding quality. The purpose of this study was to determine whether hospitals with lower readmission rates were more likely to have higher ratings on Facebook than hospitals with high readmission rates. The study found that hospitals in which patients were less likely to have unplanned readmissions within the 30 days after discharge had higher Facebook ratings than were those with higher readmission rates. “Since user-generated social media feedback appears to be reflective of patient outcomes, hospitals and health care leaders should not underestimate social media’s value in developing quality improvement programs.” (more…)
Author Interviews, Brigham & Women's - Harvard, Heart Disease, JACC, Outcomes & Safety / 17.03.2015

MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Stephen W. Waldo, MD Research Fellow in Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital MedicalResearch: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Dr. Waldo: Public reporting is intended to improve outcomes for our patients.  Proponents of public reporting applaud the increased transparency that it offers, allowing both patients and physicians to objectively evaluate health care outcomes for a given institution or individual provider.  Previous research has demonstrated, however, that public reporting of procedural outcomes may create disincentives to provide percutaneous coronary intervention for critically ill patients.  The present study sought to evaluate the association between public reporting of outcomes with procedural management and clinical outcomes among patients with acute myocardial infarction.  As the data demonstrate, public reporting of outcomes is associated with a lower rate of percutaneous revascularization and increased overall in-hospital mortality among patients with an acute myocardial infarction, particularly among those that do not receive percutaneous intervention.  This may reflect risk aversion among physicians in states that participate in public reporting, an unintended consequence of this policy. (more…)
Author Interviews, Heart Disease, Mayo Clinic, Outcomes & Safety / 11.03.2015

Dr. Leslie CurryMedicalResearch.com Interview with: Leslie Curry PhD, MPH Senior Research Scientist in and Lecturer in Public Health (Health Policy) Co-Director, Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program Yale School of Public Health Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Dr. Curry: Quality of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has improved substantially in recent years due to important investments by clinicians and policymakers; however, survival rates across U.S. Hospitals still differ greatly. Evidence suggests links between hospital organizational culture and hospital performance in care of patients with AMI. Yet few studies have attempted to shift organizational culture in order to improve performance, fewer have focused on patient outcomes, and none have addressed mortality for patients with acute myocardial infarction.  We sought to address this gap through a novel longitudinal intervention study, Leadership Saves Lives (LSL). We have a large team of people with backgrounds in nursing, medicine, health care administration and research working in 10 very diverse hospitals across the country in 10 states. All hospitals are members of the Mayo Clinic Care Network and are fully committed to saving lives of patients with heart attacks. Teams of 10-12 clinicians and administrators are devoting substantial energy, expertise and good will to this project. (more…)
Author Interviews, Outcomes & Safety / 11.03.2015

Stephen Gallo, Ph.D. Technical Operations Manager American Institute of Biological Sciences Scientific Peer Advisory and Review Services Reston, VA  20191MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Stephen Gallo, Ph.D. Technical Operations Manager American Institute of Biological Sciences Scientific Peer Advisory and Review Services Reston, VA  20191 Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Dr. Gallo: Peer review is an evaluation process widely used to help research funders identify the best projects to support. A cornerstone of the process is the independence and integrity of the review panel, which includes a fair and non-conflicted evaluation of the proposed research. Despite the importance of the process, there are few research studies  investigating the frequency and type of conflicts that occur, particularly with regard to the independent peer review of basic science research proposals. To improve our understanding of conflict of interest in the peer review process, the American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS) conducted a retrospective analysis of conflict of interest data from the independent peer review of 282 biomedical research applications. The overall ‘conflicted-ness’ of these panels was significantly lower than that reported for regulatory review panels, which have been studied by others. This might be explained by the fact that no direct financial conflicts were identified; the majority of identified conflicts were institutional or collaborative in nature. The analysis revealed that 35 percent of conflicts were self-reported by review panel members. Importantly, peer review panel managers identified 65 percent of conflicts. These results underscore the important role administrators who organize review panels play in identifying conflicts of interest. (more…)
Author Interviews, Cost of Health Care, Critical Care - Intensive Care - ICUs, Mayo Clinic, Outcomes & Safety, Pediatrics, Pediatrics / 11.03.2015

Marc Ellsworth, M.D Neonatology fellow at the Mayo Clinic Children’s CenterMedicalResearch.com Interview with: Marc Ellsworth, M.D Neonatology fellow at the Mayo Clinic Children’s Center MedicalResearch: What is the background for this study? Dr. Ellsworth: Inhaled Nitric Oxide (iNO) is a drug that has FDA approval for use in neonates >34 weeks gestational age. It is used for severe respiratory failure secondary to pulmonary hypertension. However, it has been previously shown that neonatologists have been using this medication off-label and especially in the most premature neonates. Over the last 10 years there have been multiple large studies trying to determine a clinical use (ie long term benefit) for iNO in preterm neonates (patients where there is no FDA approval for iNO use currently). Despite evidence of short term benefit (improved clinical stability) use of this drug has not been shown to improve long-term outcomes (death and chronic lung disease) in premature neonates. As a result of these findings the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) released a consensus guideline in 2011 indicated that available evidence did not support the routine use of iNO in preterm neonates and discouraged this use of this expensive therapy in preterm neonates. Similarly, in 2014 the American Academy of Pediatrics issued a similar statement with similar recommendations. In 2014 a group of NICUs (collectively called the Neonatal Research Network) associated with the NICHD published a report showing that the use of Inhaled Nitric Oxide in preterm infants (ie off-label) decreased following the report in 2011. However, I did not feel that these NICUs were representative of the United States alone as the Neonatal Research Network consists of only a handful of NICUs (~15) and is directly associated with the NICHD. As a result I wanted to get a better idea of Inhaled Nitric Oxide use in a population based study to see if the trends were similar (ie use of iNO has been decreasing) on a much larger, more representative scale. (Editorial comment: My anecdotal experience was that rates of iNO use off-label have not decreased in preterm neonates since the 2011 report). (more…)
Author Interviews, Critical Care - Intensive Care - ICUs, Hospital Readmissions, Infections, JAMA, University of Michigan / 11.03.2015

Hallie Prescott, MD, MSc Clinical Lecturer, Internal Medicine Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine University of Michigan Health System Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2800MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Hallie Prescott, MD, MSc Clinical Lecturer, Internal Medicine Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine University of Michigan Health System Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2800   Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Dr. Prescott: The post-hospital period has been widely recognized as a vulnerable time for patients. In particular, patients who survive sepsis are frequently readmitted to the hospital in the following three months. In this study, we examined data from 2,600 survivors of sepsis, a severe infection that leads to organ failure. About 42% of the sepsis patients were readmitted in the next 90 days, similar to the rate seen for patients hospitalized for other acute conditions. However, the reasons for hospital readmission after sepsis are different. A greater number of patients are re-hospitalized for “ambulatory-care sensitive conditions”, which are conditions that could potentially be prevented or treated early in the outpatient setting to avoid a hospital stay. (more…)
Annals Internal Medicine, Author Interviews, Heart Disease, Outcomes & Safety / 11.03.2015

MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Harindra C. Wijeysundera MD PhD FRCPC Interventional Cardiology, Schulich Heart Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Scientist, Sunnybrook Research Institute (SRI) Assistant Professor, Dept. of Medicine & Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation University of Toronto Adjunct Scientist, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) Toronto, ON, Canada Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Dr. Wijeysundera: Given the rapid increase in health care costs, there has been growing emphasis on the more rational use of resources.  One such effort is the development of appropriate use  criteria.  Such criteria have been developed in many areas of medicine, including in cardiology for diagnostic angiography.  The underlying rationale for a test to be appropriate is that its anticipated benefit outweighs its anticipated harms.  However, there is a paucity of empirical evidence validating this conceptual framework. Our goal was to validate the 2012 appropriate use criteria for diagnostic coronary angiography, by examining the relationship between the appropriateness of a coronary angiography in patients with suspected stable ischemic heart disease and the proportion of patients who were found to have obstructive coronary artery disease.  We used data obtained from the Cardiac Care Network registry of Ontario, Canada.  This is a population based registry of all cardiac procedures in the province of Ontario.  We examined 48,336 patients and found that 58.2% of angiographic studies were classified as appropriate, 10.8% were classified as inappropriate, and 31.0% were classified as uncertain. Overall, 45.5% of patients had obstructive CAD. In patients with appropriate indications for angiography, 52.9% had obstructive CAD, with 40.0% undergoing revascularization. In those with inappropriate indications, 30.9% had obstructive CAD and 18.9% underwent revascularization; in those with uncertain indications, 36.7% had obstructive CAD and 25.9% had revascularization. Although more patients with appropriate indications had obstructive CAD and underwent revascularization (P < 0.001), a substantial proportion of those with inappropriate or uncertain indications had important coronary disease.  Our conclusion was that despite the association between appropriateness category and obstructive CAD, this study raises concerns about the ability of the appropriate use  criteria to guide clinical decision making. (more…)
Author Interviews, Outcomes & Safety, Surgical Research / 05.03.2015

E. Patchen Dellinger, M.D. Professor of Surgery University of Washington, Box 356410 Seattle, Washington MedicalResearch.com Interview with: E. Patchen Dellinger, M.D. Professor of Surgery University of Washington Seattle, Washington Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Dr. Dellinger: We know from previous large studies that use of checklists is associated with improvements in patient morbidity and mortality. However, recent large studies have also shown that mandating teams to use the checklist without providing the support required for adequate implementation does not result in better outcomes. This report reviews findings from studies examining checklist compliance and use. We found that when compliance with the checklist is poor it is not as effective as when the checklist is carried out as it is intended. Checklist use appears to be a marker for institutional culture of safety, and organizations with a more robust safety culture may be more likely to use the checklist in an effective manner with resulting improvements in patient safety. (more…)
Author Interviews, JAMA, Outcomes & Safety, Surgical Research / 03.03.2015

MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Dr. Stephen Duquette MD Indiana University Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery R.L Roudebush VA  Indianapolis, IN Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Dr. Duquette: Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common compressive peripheral neuropathy, causing pain, numbness and weakness.  Conservative treatment options include splinting, NSAID pain medications, and steroid injections.  Most often the definitive therapy is carpal tunnel release (CTR).  Over 500,000 procedures are performed in the US yearly, making it one of the most commonly performed hand surgery procedures.  In the United States it is most common to perform this operation in the operating room, under sedation and locoregional anesthesia.  Because it is a very common disease that is treated surgically, process improvement can have a major impact in time to OR, patient recovery, patient satisfaction, and overall throughput.  This is especially valuable in the Veterans Administration (VA) system, where recent problems have arisen due to lack of adequate resources to care for all veterans. This study examined the impact of opening an office-based procedure room in a VA to perform awake hand surgery under local anesthesia only.   This was compared to the prior practice of operating room carpal tunnel release though a number of performance metrics, including time to OR and complications.  Although office carpal tunnel releases are performed routinely in Canada, some surgeons still believe that the complications would increase outside the very sterile environment of the operating room. The current study showed that wait times from initial consultation and initial visit to surgical intervention were significantly decreased in the procedure room group compared to the operating room.  The complication rate was the same for both groups, showing that the procedure room and the operating room were both equally safe and efficacious in providing an environment that was ideal for the performance of carpal tunnel releases. (more…)
Author Interviews, C. difficile, CDC, Hand Washing, Outcomes & Safety / 26.02.2015

Fernanda C. Lessa, M.D., M.P.H. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, GAMedicalResearch.com Interview with: Fernanda C. Lessa, M.D., M.P.H. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, GA MedicalResearch: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Dr. Lessa: The epidemiology of Clostridium difficile has gone through dramatic changes over the last decade. C. difficile has become the most common cause of healthcare-associated infections in US hospitals and it has been also increasingly reported outside of healthcare settings. As the epidemiology of this pathogen changes, it is important to understand the magnitude and scope of this infection in the United States to help guide priorities for prevention. Main findings: 1)      C. difficile was responsible for almost half million infections and associated with 29,000 deaths in 2011 in the United States 2)      Among the patients who developed C. difficile, 83,000 had recurrent infections 3)      C. difficile incidence was higher among females, whites, and persons 65 years of age or older 4)       Approximately 345,400 infections occurred outside of the hospital indicating that C. difficile prevention should go beyond hospital settings. (more…)