30 Dec Parents: Vaping is Drawing Adolescents into Nicotine Use
Posted at 18:11h
in Author Interviews, NEJM, Pediatrics, Smoking, Tobacco, Tobacco Research, University of Michigan
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
[caption id="attachment_46749" align="alignleft" width="159"]
Dr. Miech[/caption]
Richard Miech Ph.D
Professor
Principal Investigator, Monitoring the Future
Institute for Social Research
University of Michigan
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Every year Monitoring the Future conducts a survey to examine trends in adolescent substance use. We draw a random sample of schools from a list of all schools in the United States and conduct our survey in ~400 schools. Our survey is representative of U.S. 8th, 10th, and 12th grade students. In other words, our results are what you would find if you surveyed every single 8th, 10th, and 12th graders in the United States, within the bounds of a small sampling error of a few percentage points.
An increase in vaping is the big news for 2018. In 10th and 12th grade the increase in nicotine vaping was the largest we've ever seen for any substance in the past 43 years. As a result of this increase in nicotine vaping, overall use of nicotine increased as well, which suggests that vaping is drawing youth into nicotine use. We also saw a significant increase in marijuana vaping.
Dr. Daniel Romer[/caption]
Daniel Romer PhD
Annenberg Public Policy Center
The University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, PA
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Previous research has found some troubling relations between adolescent cannabis use and subsequent increases in conduct problems and other unhealthy consequences. These studies were done in New Zealand in the late 90’s and we wanted to re-examine those relationships using more contemporary data in the US.
We had data on 364 adolescents who were followed from age 13 to 19 in Philadelphia that could provide a more up to date picture of the effects of using cannabis on one important outcome, conduct disorder. We also wanted to use more sensitive methods than had been used in prior research that would enable us to examine reciprocal relations between cannabis use and c (CP). That is, it might be the case that youth with CP are prone to using cannabis and that this helps to explain why there appears to be a relation over time between cannabis use and CP rather than cannabis use leading to CP.
Our findings supported that hypothesis. There was no prospective relation between changes in cannabis use and subsequent changes in conduct problems. Instead, changes in conduct problems were found to predict changes in use of cannabis. Youth with conduct problems also affiliated more with peers who used cannabis, adding further to their own use. There was also no evidence that youth who used cannabis sought out peers who used it apart from the effects of CP.
Finally, both use of cannabis and conduct problems predicted subsequent development of a mild cannabis use disorder (CUD).
Faiz Gani, PhD
Postdoctoral research fellow
Department of Surgery
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Firearm related injuries are a leading cause of injury and death in the United States, yet, due to combination of factors, limited data exist that evaluate these injuries, particularly among younger patients (patients younger than 18 years).
The objective of this study was to describe emergency department utilization for firearm related injuries and to quantitate the financial burden associated with these injuries.
In our study of over 75,000 emergency department visits, we observed that each year, over 8,300 children and adolescents present to the emergency department for the treatment / management of a gunshot injury. Within this sub-population of patients, we observed that these injuries are most frequent among patients aged 15-17 years and while these injuries decreased over time initially, were observed to increase again towards the end of the time period studied.
In addition to describing the clinical burden of these injuries, we also sought to describe the financial burden associated with these injuries. For patients discharged from the emergency department, the average (median) charge associated with their care was $2,445, while for patients admitted as inpatients for further care, the average (median) charge was $44,966.
Collectively these injuries resulted in $2.5 billion in emergency department and hospital charges over the time period studied. This translates to an annual financial burden of approximately $270 million.















