Author Interviews, JAMA, Neurological Disorders, Radiology, UCLA / 28.11.2016
Neuroimaging Detects Chemical Disturbances in Stuttering
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Joseph O’Neill, PhD
Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
University of California–Los Angeles Semel Institute for Neuroscience
Los Angeles
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Stuttering seriously diminishes quality of life. While many children who stutter eventually grow out of it, stuttering does persist into adulthood in many others, despite treatment. Like earlier investigators, we are using neuroimaging to explore possible brain bases of stuttering, aiming, eventually, to improve prognosis. What's novel is that our study deploy neuroimaging modalities-- arterial spin labelling and, in this paper, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)-- not previously employed in stuttering. MRS offers prospects of detecting possible neurochemical disturbances in stuttering.
The MRS results showed differences in neurometabolite-- brain chemicals-- levels between people who stutter (adults and children) and those who don't in many brain regions where other neuroimaging has also observed effects of stuttering. In particular, MRS effects were apparent in brain circuits where our recent fMRI work detected signs of stuttering, circuits subserving self-regulation of speech production, attention and emotion. This reinforces the idea that stuttering has to do with how the brain manages its own activity along multiple dimensions: motivation, allocation of resources, and behavioral output.







Dr. Gregg Fonarow[/caption]
Gregg C. Fonarow, MD, FACC, FAHA
Eliot Corday Professor of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science
Director, Ahmanson-UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center
Co-Chief of Clinical Cardiology, UCLA Division of Cardiology
Co-Director, UCLA Preventative Cardiology Program
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1679
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Fonarow: Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) have been demonstrated to reduce mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. However, to date, the population level impact of optimal implementation of this therapy in the United States has not been evaluated.
This new analysis estimates that as many 28,484 deaths in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients annually could be prevented or postponed with optimal use of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (with sensitivity analyses demonstrating a range of 18,230 to 41,017).
Dr. John Mafi[/caption]
John N. Mafi, MD, MPH
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research
UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine
Los Angeles, CA 90024
Affiliated Adjunct in Health Policy
RAND Corporation
Santa Monica, CA 90401
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Mafi: The U.S. healthcare system faces a looming shortage of primary care physicians, with some estimates as high as 20,000 physicians by the year 2020. In addition, fewer and fewer trainees enter primary care careers because of the harder work and lower salaries. Combine this with the passage of the Affordable Care Act and the millions of newly insured patients looking for a primary care provider, and you have created a perfect storm where timely access to primary care becomes essentially unachievable.
Many advocate for expanding the role of nurse practitioners and physician assistants to mitigate the physician shortage. But this is controversial as most doctors believe nurse practitioners provide inferior care to doctors and many feel that expanding their role would worsen the value and efficiency of the U.S. healthcare system.
While studies suggest they provide similar quality of care to physicians, few have actually evaluated whether they provide greater amounts of inefficient or low value care. Low value care is important because it can harm patients (antibiotics for colds don’t help patients and have harmful side effects) and they can raise healthcare costs. In this context, we used a large national database on ambulatory visits to compare the quality and efficiency of care among nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and physicians in the U.S. primary care setting.
In our 15 year analysis of nearly 29,000 patients who saw either a nurse practitioner, physician assistant, or a physician, we found similar rates of inappropriate antibiotic use for colds, unnecessary imaging (such as x-rays, CT scans, and MRI scans) for back pain and headache, and potentially necessary referrals to specialists for these same three conditions.




Dr. Chirag Patil[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Chirag Patil, MD
American Board Certified Neurosurgeon
Brain & Spine Tumor Program
Lead Investigator, Precision Medicine Initiative Against Brain Cancer
Program Director, Neurosurgical Residence training program
Director, Center for Neurosurgical Outcomes Research Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
MedicalResearch.com Editor’s note: Dr. Patil’s research is focused on developing a method of personalized cancer treatment through the harnessing of genome wide mutational analysis of a specific patient’s cancer.
MedicalResearch.com: Would you tell us a little about yourself and your research interests?
Dr. Patil: I am a Stanford-trained, Board Certified Neurosurgeon and cancer researcher at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, California. I primarily focus on the care of patients with malignant brain tumors, particularly glioblastomas. I received my undergraduate degree from Cornell, followed by a medical degree from the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), where I was a Regent’s scholar. I completed a residency in neurosurgery and a fellowship in stereotactic radiology at Stanford University. I also have a master’s degree in epidemiology with a focus on clinical trial design and mathematical modeling from Stanford.
MedicalResearch.com: Can you tell us about some of your research interests?
Dr. Patil: I am keenly interested in and focused on developing precision science-powered novel brain tumor therapies, immuno-therapies, and patient-centered “big data” outcomes research. I lead the recently-funded Cedars-Sinai Precision Medicine Initiative Against Brain Cancer, which utilizes tumor genomics to build a mathematical computer model, i.e., a virtual cancer cell of each patient’s unique tumor. The White House and several other stakeholders have taken keep interest in this research initiative as an example of a leading precision medicine program.
Dr. Aaron Dawes[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Aaron J. Dawes, MD
Fellow, VA/RWJF Clinical Scholars Program
Division of Health Services Research
University of California Los Angeles
Los Angeles, CA 90024
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Dawes: We reviewed the published literature to answer three basic questions about bariatric surgery and mental health conditions.
First, how common are mental health conditions among patients being referred for or undergoing bariatric surgery?
Prof. Voskuhl[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Professor Rhonda Voskuhl, M.D.
Jack H. Skirball Chair in MS Research
Director of the UCLA MS Program
David Geffen School of Medicine
University of California, Los Angeles
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Voskuhl: It had been known for decades that relapses were reduced during pregnancy in women with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis. We viewed this as a major clue to help find new disease modifying treatments. Focusing on MS, we investigated treatment with estriol, an estrogen that is made by the fetus/placenta during pregnancy. Preclinical studies and a pilot clinical trial at UCLA showed good results leading to the current Phase 2 clinical trial at 16 sites across the U.S. It showed that treatment with estriol pills compared to placebo pills, each in combination with standard of care (glatirmar acetate) injections, reduced relapses by one third to one half over and above standard of care treatment.
Dr. Soroush Zaghi[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Soroush Zaghi, MD
Department of Head and Neck Surgery
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
University of California, Los Angeles
MedicalResearch: What is the central message for clinicians and surgeons from your results?
Dr. Zaghi: Multiple studies from different practitioners and institutions agree that Maxillomandibular Advancement (MMA) is a highly effective surgical option for patients with obstructive sleep apnea who cannot tolerate positive pressure therapy and have not found success with other surgical procedures.
Dr. McCabe[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Edward R. B. McCabe, MD, PhD
Senior Vice President and Chief Medical Officer
Professor Adjunct of Pediatrics
Yale University School of Medicine
Distinguished Professor Emeritus, Department of Pediatrics & Inaugural Mattel Executive Endowed Chair of Pediatrics, UCLA School of Medicine
Inaugural Physician-in-Chief, Mattel Children's Hospital
Chief Medical Officer March of Dimes
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. McCabe: 



