Berberine in the Age of Ozempic: Discussing What the RCT Evidence Shows
Supplement Notice: Berberine is a dietary supplement and is not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. It is not a substitute for prescription medications including metformin, semaglutide (Ozempic/Wegovy), or any other FDA-approved therapy. Berberine can interact with prescription medications including warfarin, cyclosporine, and metformin. Do not use berberine as a replacement for prescribed treatment without consulting your physician. Always seek the advice of a qualified healthcare provider before starting any supplement regimen.
Few supplements have had a more dramatic cultural moment than berberine. Once confined to the shelves of specialty health stores and the protocols of integrative medicine practitioners, berberine has become something of a phenomenon — propelled partly by social media comparisons to semaglutide (sold as Ozempic and Wegovy), a prescription GLP-1 receptor agonist that has transformed the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. The comparison has a surface-level appeal. Both compounds influence metabolic pathways involved in blood sugar regulation. Both are discussed in the context of weight management. Berberine is a fraction of the cost, available without a prescription, and marketed across wellness channels as a "natural" alternative. The shorthand — "nature's Ozempic" — spread quickly and widely. The problem is that shorthand compresses a complicated evidence picture into a slogan. What the randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence on berberine actually shows is more interesting — and more nuanced — than either its most enthusiastic proponents or its dismissers tend to acknowledge.
Dr. Klonoff[/caption]
Prof. Michaelides[/caption]
Professor Michel Michaelides BSc MB BS MD(Res) FRCOphth FACS
Professor of Ophthalmology and Consultant Ophthalmic Surgeon
UCL Institute of Ophthalmology and Moorfields Eye Hospital
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Hagobian[/caption]
Todd Hagobian, Ph.D.
pronouns he/him/his
Department Chair & Professor, Kinesiology and Public Health
Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo, CA
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Previous observational studies have shown that urinary BPA is related to Type 2 diabetes risk. Meaning, higher urinary BPA is related to an increased risk of Type 2 diabetes. However, no published study to date has determined whether several days of BPA administration (participants consume BPA) increases the risk of Type 2 diabetes.
MedicalResearch.com: Where is bisphenol found? Can exposure to bisphenol be limited in everyday life?
Response: BPA and other bisphenols are found in canned foods and plastics. BPA is one of the most widely used synthetic chemicals and we consume foods that are packed in this chemical. Most of BPA exposure comes from canned foods, and 93% of the US populations has detectable urine levels of BPA. We can limit BPA by reducing canned foods (or purchased BPA free cans) and plastic use.
Dr. Hafezi-Moghadam[/caption]
Ali Hafezi-Moghadam, Ph.D., M.D
Director, Molecular Biomarkers Nano-Imaging Laboratory (MBNI)
Associate Professor of Radiology, Harvard Medical School
Brigham and Women’s Hospital
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: “It is very easy to answer many fundamental biological questions” said Richard Feynman in his 1959 address, where he also offered his simple and ingenious solution: “you just look at the thing!”
Prof. Hiddo Lambers Heerspink, PhD PHARMD
Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen
Yuxia Wei[/caption]
Yuxia Wei | PhD Student
Unit of Epidemiology
Institute of Environmental Medicine
Karolinska Institutet
Stockholm | Sweden
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Diabetes is traditionally known for having two types (type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes). However, it is becoming increasingly clear that diabetes is much more complex than this traditional classification. Several attempts have been made to address this heterogeneity and in 2018, a Swedish ground-breaking study proposed that there are five distinct subtypes of diabetes in adults. They have been replicated in different populations and it has been shown that there are differences between the subtypes in terms of genetics and risks of complications. Another way of elucidating the relevance of these subtypes is to investigate whether the influence of known risk factors for diabetes is different on different subtypes. Our study is one of the first attempts to address this. We used a study design known as Mendelian randomization, to investigate the influence of childhood obesity on these diabetes subtypes that typically occur after age 35. This work was a collaboration between Karolinska institutet in Stockholm, University of Bristol in the UK and Sun Yat-Sen University in China.