MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Ravi Rajaram MD
Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery and Center for Healthcare Studies in the Institute for Public Health and Medicine
Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Rajaram: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medication Education (ACGME) first implemented restrictions to resident duty hours in 2003. In surgical populations, these reforms have not been associated with a change in patient outcomes.
However, in 2011, the ACGME further restricted resident duty hours to include: a maximum of 16 hours of continuous duty for first-year residents (interns), direct supervision of interns at all times, a maximum of 4 hours for transitions in care activities for residents in-house for 24 hours, and that these residents be given 14 hours off prior to returning to work. The association between the 2011 ACGME resident duty hour reform with surgical patient outcomes and resident education has not previously been reported.
The 2011 resident duty hour reform was not associated with a change in death or serious morbidity in the two years after the reform was implemented. Additionally, the 2011 duty hour reform was not associated with a change in any of the secondary outcomes examined, including any morbidity, failure to rescue, surgical site infection, and sepsis.
Furthermore, common measures of surgical resident education, such as in-training examination scores and board certification pass rates, were unchanged after the implementation of the 2011 duty hour reform when compared to scores prior to the reform.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Lisa Diamond, MD, MPH, FACP | Assistant Attending
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Immigrant Health and Cancer Disparities Service
Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences | Department of Medicine Evelyn Lauder Breast Center New York, NY 10065
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Diamond: More than 25 million U.S. residents have limited English proficiency, an 80 percent increase from 1990 to 2010. Limited English proficiency (LEP) may impede participation in the English language-dominant health care system. Little is known about the non-English-language skills of physicians in training. In our analysis of the non-English-language skills of applicants to residency programs in the U.S., we found that although applicants are linguistically diverse, most of their languages do not match the languages spoken by the U.S. population with Limited English proficiency.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Cheryl K. Walker, MD
Associate Professor
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Faculty, The MIND Institute
School of Medicine, University of California, Davis
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Walker: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurobehavioral condition identified in 1 in 68 U.S. children and is part of a broader group of developmental disabilities that affects 1 in 6 children. Growing evidence suggests that Autism spectrum disorder and developmental delay originate during fetal life. Preeclampsia is a complicated and frequently dangerous pregnancy condition that appears to arise from a shallow placental connection and may increase the risk of abnormal neurodevelopment through several pathways.
Medical Research: What are the main findings?
Dr. Walker: Children with Autism spectrum disorder were more than twice as likely to have been exposed to preeclampsia compared with children with typical development. Risk for ASD was increased further in children born to mothers with more severe presentations of preeclampsia. Mothers of children with developmental delay were more than 5 times more likely to have had severe forms preeclampsia – often with evidence of reduced placental function – compared with mothers of children with typical development.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Brian L. Sprague, PhD
Office of Health Promotion Research,
University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
MedicalResearch: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Sprague: Mammographic breast density refers to the appearance of breast tissue on a mammogram. High breast density means that there is a greater amount of glandular tissue and connective tissue, which appears white on a mammogram. It is more difficult to detect breast cancer on a mammogram when there is greater breast density. It has also been shown that women with dense breasts are at a higher risk of developing breast cancer. Because of these two factors, women with dense breasts have a greater chance of developing breast cancer after a normal screening mammogram than women whose breasts are not dense. Many states have now passed laws that require mammography facilities to inform women with dense breasts so that they are aware of this. Similar legislation is now under consideration at the national level. More than 40% of women undergoing mammography screening have dense breasts.
Researchers are trying to determine whether supplemental breast cancer screening with other tools would improve outcomes for women with dense breasts. One possible approach is to use ultrasound imaging to screen for breast cancer in women with dense breasts after they have had a normal mammogram. We wanted to estimate the benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of this approach compared to mammography screening only. No randomized trials or observational studies have assessed long term outcomes after ultrasound screening for women with dense breasts, but we have short term data on how often cancer is diagnosed by ultrasound screening and how often false positive exams occur. We used computer simulation modeling to estimate long term outcomes by combining the currently available data on mammography and ultrasound screening with the best available data on breast cancer risk and survival.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Sandra Barral Rodriguez, Ph.D
Assistant Professor
G. H. Sergievsky Center & Taub Institute
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, NY 10032
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Barral: We already know that there is a substantial genetic contribution to the variability observed in different cognitive tasks including memory performance. Previous work reported heritability estimates for episodic memory ranging between 30% and 60%. However, we can’t fully explain why some individuals demonstrate a better memory performance in late life, while others do not.
We have previously defined a cognitive endophenotype based on exceptional episodic memory performance (EEM) and demonstrated that there is a familial aggregation of EEM in families selected on their basis of their exceptional survival, the Long Life Family Study. We performed genome-wide linkage analysis of long-lived families selected on the basis of their exceptional episodic memory and the follow-up SNP association analysis with episodic memory in four independent cohorts of more than 4,000 non-demented elderly cohorts.
Our results provide strong evidence for potential candidate genes related to exceptional episodic memory on 6q24.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Amit Navin Vora MD, MPH
Third Year Cardiovascular Fellow
John Hopkins University
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Current guidelines recommend timely reperfusion in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, with primary PCI being the preferred method if delivered in an expedient fashion. Otherwise, guidelines recommend that eligible patients should be treated with fibrinolysis prior to transfer to a PCI capable hospital. In our study, we used Google Maps to estimate drive times between the initial presenting hospital and the PCI-capable hospital looked at the association between estimated drive time and reperfusion strategy (primary PCI or fibrinolysis) selection.
We found that less than half of eligible patients with an estimated drive time of more than 30 minutes received primary PCI in time, and only half of patients with more than an hour’s drive received lytics before transfer. This suggests that neither primary PCI nor pre-transfer fibrinolytic therapy is being used optimally. Among eligible patients with a drive time of 30-120 minutes, we found no significant mortality difference but higher bleeding risk among patients receiving lytics prior to transfer; this increased bleeding risk was focused in patients that required rescue PCI.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Catherine A. Marco, MD, FACEP Professor
Department of Emergency Medicine
Wright State University
Kettering, OH 45429
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Marco: In 2003, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) implemented standards on duty hours and supervision. A maximum of 80 hours of duty per week were stipulated. The aim of these standards was to promote resident learning and patient safety. However, evidence has not clearly demonstrated whether the 2003 requirements improved trainee well-being or patient safety. On July 1, 2011, the ACGME implemented additional regulations on duty hours and supervision, including a 16 hour maximum shift length for PGY1 residents. The duty hours standards were implemented to ensure patient safety and provide an excellent teaching environment. Emergency Medicine has additional duty hours requirements for emergency department rotations, including a maximum of 12 continuous scheduled hours, and a maximum 60 scheduled hours per week seeing patients in the emergency department, and no more than 72 duty hours per week.
We found that among a large cohort of 4134 Emergency Medicine residents, the majority of residents stated that they are working the appropriate number of hours to practice independently at graduation. The majority of residents believe that current duty hours regulations improve patient safety. The majority of residents agreed that duty hour regulations are currently appropriate.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Julia Lewis, MD, Lead Investigator
Nephrologist and Professor of Medicine
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Lewis: The 48-week Open Label Extension (OLE) study for Auryxia™ (ferric citrate) was conducted to determine long term safety following the Phase 3 52-week active-control period. The study also evaluated changes in serum phosphorus, transferrin saturation (TSAT), serum ferritin, hemoglobin, hematocrit and additional parameters, as well as intravenous (IV) iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) usage.
In the OLE study, Auryxia demonstrated long-term safety in dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. The results were consistent with those seen in the published pivotal Phase 3 trial.
The study demonstrated that the adverse events (AE’s) profile of Auryxia was similar to that seen in the Phase 3 52-week active-control period. AEs occurred in 142 patients treated with Auryxia. They were primarily non-serious gastrointestinal (GI) - related AE’s, including diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and constipation. Serious adverse events occurred in 75 patients, though none were related to Auryxia. In addition, there were no clinically or statistically significant differences in liver enzymes or aluminum levels observed from baseline to the end of the 48 weeks.
Similar to the original trial, we witnessed excellent phosphorus control with the drug, along with an increase and then a plateau in serum ferritin and TSAT levels with Auryxia. The plateauing of serum ferritin and TSAT further supports iron absorption is highly regulated by the gastrointestinal track as seen in the 52-week active control period. This suggests that the body absorbs iron as needed for effective erythropoiesis.
Additionally, iron store increases from ferric citrate resulted in, by the end of the extension study, 85% of subjects not using any IV iron.
We presented this data at the 2014 American Society of Nephrology Meeting. The abstract can be found online at www.asn-online.org.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Simin Liu, MD, ScD, Professor of Epidemiology
School of Public Health, Professor of Medicine
The Warren Alpert School of Medicine
Director, Molecular Epidemiology and Nutrition
Brown University
MedicalResearch: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Liu: Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are highly heritable and share many risk factors and show ethnic-specific prevalence. Nevertheless, a comprehensive molecular-level understanding of these observations is lacking. We conducted a comprehensive assessment of whole genome assessment using network-based analysis in >15,000 women and identified eight molecular pathways share in both diseases as well as several “key driver” genes that appear to form the gene networks in which these pathways connect and interact.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Barbara J. Drew, RN, PhD, FAAN, FAHA
David Mortara Distinguished Professor in Physiological Nursing Research, Clinical Professor of Medicine, Cardiology
University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)
Department of Physiological Nursing San FranciscoMedicalResearch.comInterview with: Amro Qaddoura BHSc Research Student of Adrian Baranchuk, MD Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada MedicalResearch: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Response: This publication was a letter to the editor in response to comments on our recent systematic review and meta-analysis that showed...
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Marcus Munafò PhD
Professor of Biological Psychology
MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit
UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies
School of Experimental Psychology
University of Bristol United Kingdom
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Munafo: We were conducting an analysis of data on smoking behaviour and body mass index (BMI), in order to better understand the potential causal effects of smoking on different measures of adiposity. Mendelian randomisation uses genetic variants associated with the exposure of interest (in this case smoking) as proxies for the exposure, in order to reduce the risk of spurious associations arising from confounding or reverse causality. As expected, we found that, among current smokers, a genetic variant associated with heavier smoking was associated with lower BMI, providing good evidence that smoking reduces BMI. However, we also unexpectedly found that the same variant was associated with higher BMI in never smokers. This suggests that this variant might be influencing BMI via pathways other than smoking.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Immaculata De Vivo PhD
Associate Professor Harvard Medical School
Director, Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center High Throughput Genotyping Core
Facility. Channing Division of Network Medicine
Boston, MA 02115
MedicalResearch: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. De Vivo: Our study found that greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet is associated with longer telomeres. Following a diet closer to the Mediterranean diet, can prevent accelerated telomere shortening. Our unique contribution to the literature is that we provide a potential molecular mechanism, preventing telomere shortening. Telomeres are bits of DNA that protect your chromosomes.
MedicalResearch: Is telomere shortening reversible?
Dr. De Vivo: Telomere shortening is a biological process, the shorten with age.
However, lifestyle choices can help to prevent accelerated shortening.
Fruits, vegetables, olive oil and nuts – key components of the Mediterranean diet have well known antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects that could balance out the “bad effects” of smoking and obesity.
Silvana Papagerakis M.S., M.D., Ph.D.
Research Assistant Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
Director, Oral, Head and Neck Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Laboratory, Ann Arbor MI
MedicalResearch: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Papagerakis: We had suspicions that these medications somehow had a favorable impact on patient outcomes. This led us to review our large cohort of patients and screen them for common medications, focusing on antacids. In fact, our study did show that people taking antacids are doing better. What this study makes clear is that these medications may be more beneficial to the patients than just controlling side effects of chemotherapy or radiation treatment for head and neck cancer.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with
Joshua Sandry, Ph.D.
Neuropsychology & Neuroscience Research
Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ
Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Rutgers New Jersey Medical School
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Sandry: We were interested in better understanding the relationship between cognitive reserve and long-term memory impairment in moderate to severe Traumatic Brain Injury, from a cognitive perspective. The theory of cognitive reserve suggests that individuals who engage in intellectually enriching activities may be less susceptible to the negative cognitive consequences of long-term memory impairment that often accompanies neurological disorders. There’s significant evidence in support of cognitive reserve; however, it’s somewhat unclear what particular cognitive processes are involved in this relationship and how those cognitive processes may differ across high and low reserve individuals. We derived our predictions on the basis of well-established cognitive theory and found that working memory capacity partially mediates the cognitive reserve – long-term memory relationship in Traumatic Brain Injury. Or to put it another way, working memory may be one underlying cognitive process involved in this relationship. Importantly, this finding corroborates some recent related work we have conducted in multiple sclerosis.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Frank W. Roemer, MD
Associate Professor of Radiology
Co-Director, Quantitative Imaging Center (QIC), Department of Radiology Boston University School of Medicine
and Associate Professor of Radiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Roemer: Meniscal surgery is one of the most common orthopedic procedures performed in order to alleviate pain and improve joint function. However, increasing evidence is emerging that suggests that meniscal resection is detrimental for knee joint preservation including accelerated rates of OA and joint deterioration defined as cartilage loss. Our study focuses on disease onset and shows that structural damage due to surgery might also be observed in these early stages of disease. In light of this the indications for performing meniscal surgery might need to be defined more stringently as is the case today in order to preserve joint structure in the long term.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. John Seeger, PharmD, DrPH
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Dr. Seeger: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: This study is part of an ongoing research program initiated in 2013 to assess prescribing patterns and real-world safety and effectiveness of oral anticoagulants, including dabigatran, for the reduction of stroke risk. The study program is expected to run through the end of 2016. Boehringer Ingelheim and Brigham and Women’s Hospital are aiming to gather data from more than 100,000 U.S. NVAF patients.
Using a sequential matched cohort design, the safety and effectiveness of dabigatran compared to warfarin among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) receiving these medications in routine care settings can be assessed periodically. The interim findings at this stage come from 38,378 non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients in two health insurance databases, MarketScan (31,058 patients) and UnitedHealth (7,320 patients). The primary analysis follows patients from start of therapy until a switch or discontinuation of the anticoagulant, an outcome event, or disenrollment. The average follow-up was five months for patients in the dabigatran group and four months for those taking warfarin. The primary outcomes measured in the analysis are stroke and major hemorrhage.
Interim findings from the combined databases showed a 25 percent reduction in the rate of major hemorrhage (hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.87, 354 vs. 395 events) and a 23 percent reduction in strokes (HR 0.77, CI 0.54-1.09, 62 vs 69 events) for dabigatran compared to warfarin among these patients with NVAF. The database-specific results indicate a reduction in the rate of major hemorrhage with dabigatran (MarketScan: HR 0.78, CI 0.67- 0.91; UnitedHealth: HR 0.56, CI 0.36-0.86). In the larger MarketScan database, dabigatran reduced the stroke rate by 36 percent (HR 0.64, CI 0.44-0.95), while in the smaller UnitedHealth database, stroke rates were not different between the two anticoagulants, as there were only 26 strokes in total which led to wide confidence intervals (HR=1.62, CI 0.72-3.66).
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Elissa R. Price, MD
Assistant Professor of Clinical Radiology
Director of Clinical Operations, Breast Imaging
Breast Imaging Fellowship Program Director
Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging
University of California, San Francisco San Francisco, CA 94115
MedicalResearch: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Price: Screening mammography recommendations for the 40 - 49 age group is very controversial. 2009 USPTF guidelines emphasized taking patient context into account when making decisions for these young women. Recent publications have suggested risk-based screening strategies. Family history and breast density are important are easily accessible risk factors.
Had we been using this risk-based approach to screening mammography at our institution, we would have missed more than 3Ž4 of the screen detected breast cancers in the 40-49 age group, thereby foregoing most of the survival benefit from screening mammography.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Martin C. Tammemägi
Professor (Epidemiology), Brock University
Department of Health Sciences
St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada L2S 3A1
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Tammemägi: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in North America and the world. Lung cancer survival following diagnosis is generally poor, in the range of 10% to 15%, and has improved little over the last four decades. The biggest recent breakthrough for reducing lung cancer mortality came with the findings of the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), a large, well-conducted randomized screening trial, which demonstrated that low dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening versus chest X-ray (CXR) screening can reduce lung cancer mortality by 20%. Currently, most guidelines for selecting screenees for lung screening use the NLST enrolment criteria of 30 or more pack-years smoked, former smokers must have quit smoking within 15 years and ages between 55 and 74, or use a variant of the NLST criteria. The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) essentially recommends using the NLST criteria but extended the inclusion age to 80 years.
The current study applied the PLCOm2012 lung cancer risk prediction model1 to NLST data and identified that the risk above which lung cancer mortality is consistently lower in the LDCT arm compared to the CXR arm, is ≥1.51% 6-year risk (65th percentile). The USPSTF and the PLCOm2012 risk ≥0.0151 criteria were then applied to the Prostate Lung Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) intervention arm smokers (the PLCOm2012 was developed in PLCO controls) to determine who would be selected for lung cancer screening. Compared to USPSTF criteria, the PLCOm2012 risk ≥0.0151 threshold selected 8.8% fewer individuals, but identified 12.4% more lung cancers (sensitivity 80.1% vs. 71.2%), and had fewer false positives (specificity 66.2% vs. 62.7%). 26% of smokers who were USPSTF criteria positive had risks below the PLCOm2012 risk ≥0.0151 threshold. Of PLCO former smokers who quit more than 15 years ago, 8.5% had PLCOm2012 risk ≥0.0151, suggesting that they might benefit from screening (2.9% of them developed lung cancer in 6 year). None of 65,711 never-smokers in the PLCO had PLCOm2012 risk ≥0.0151, indicating that never-smokers should not be screened. Individuals age ≥65–80 years had significantly higher risks and more lung cancers than those 55-64 years.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Stefan Johansson, MD PhD
consultant neonatologist
Stockholm, Sweden
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Johansson: Maternal obesity (BMI ≥ 30) has previously been linked to increased infant mortality. However, research has not produced consistent results. For example, there are disagreements whether infants to overweight mothers (BMI 25-29) are at increased risk, and research on BMI-related specific causes of death is scarce.