Author Interviews, CT Scanning, Heart Disease / 24.12.2015
Coronary Calcium Score Plus Family History Better Identifies Individuals at Risk of Heart Disease
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Joan Pinto-Sietsma MD PhD
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
Academic Medical Center
Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: A positive family history for premature coronary artery disease is an important risk factor for coronary artery disease. Therefore, it is frequently proposed to be included in current risk assessment tools and clinical practice guidelines. On the other hand, a positive family history for coronary artery disease only identifies families at risk, whereas it fails to identify which specific individual within a family is at particular risk. Therefore, its applicability in clinical practice is limited.
The detection of subclinical atherosclerosis as assessed by assessing coronary artery calcification, with CT scanning, has emerged as prognostic evaluation of coronary artery disease. Prospective follow-up studies have shown that coronary artery calcification predicts cardiovascular events, independent of risk factors. Therefore, assessing coronary artery calcifications in families with premature coronary artery disease might help in determining which individuals within such families are at particular risk and therefore help decide regarding treatment.
We analysed the association between a positive family history for premature coronary artery disease and coronary artery calcifications in 704 asymptomatic individuals. Furthermore, we assessed the predictive value of coronary artery calcifications in individuals with a positive family history for premature coronary artery disease in a sub analysis in 834 individuals of the St. Francis Heart Study, in which subjects were followed for about 3.5 years.
We observed, that individuals of high risk families (a positive family history of premature coronary artery disease) had a 2 time higher risk to have a calcium score > the 80th percentile as compared to individuals with a negative family history of premature coronary artery disease. Besides, individuals from high risk families with a high calcium score (> the 80th percentile) had a 2 time higher risk to get a cardiovascular event in 3,5 years, whereas individuals of high risk families without coronary calcifications did not have an increased risk at all.
Prof. Kazem Rahimi[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Kazem Rahimi | FRCP DM MSc FESC
Associate Professor of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford
Deputy Director, The George Institute for Global Health
James Martin Fellow in Healthcare Innovation, Oxford Martin School
Honorary Consultant Cardiologist, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Prof. Rahimi: Although the benefits of blood pressure lowering treatment for prevention of cardiovascular disease are well established, the extent to which these effects differ by baseline blood pressure, presence of co-morbidities (such as stroke or diabetes), or drug class is less clear.
Medical Research: What should clinicians and patients take away from your report?
Prof. Rahimi: Our study has several implications for clinical practice. Our findings suggest that blood pressure lowering to levels below those recommended in current guidelines (ie, systolic
blood pressure of less than 140 mm Hg) will reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. By showing no evidence for a threshold below which blood pressure lowering ceases to work, the findings call for blood pressure lowering based on an individual’s potential net benefit from treatment rather than treatment of the risk factor to a specific target. Furthermore, the differences we identified between classes of drugs support more targeted drug use for individuals at high risk of specific outcomes (eg, calcium channel blocker therapy for individuals at high risk of stroke or and diuretics are more eff ective for prevention of heart failure).
Overall, our findings clearly show that treating 
Dr. Leclercq[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Florence Leclercq, MD, PhD
Department of Cardiology
Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital
University hospital of Montpellier
Montpellier,France
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Patients with history of coronary artery disease (CAD) are considered as a population with high risk of further coronary events. However, frequent pre-existing ECG changes observed in these patients result in difficulty interpreting new ECG aspects in case of chest discomfort. Furthermore, anxiety frequently induced non-cardiac causes of chest pain in these patients, leading to unjustified admission to cardiology units. Moreover, levels of troponin are usually higher in patients with previous CAD compared to patients without history of angina, resulting in difficulty interpreting baseline values in this population. Conversely, copeptin may be influenced by the severity of myocardial ischemia and resulting endogenous stress, and could be a useful additional marker to exclude severe coronary stenosis in high-risk patients with recent chest pain.
This propective monocentric study evaluates the incremental value of copeptin associated with high-sensitivity cardiac T troponin (hs-cTnT) to exclude severe coronary stenosis in 96 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and acute chest pain.
Mean age of patients was 60 +/- 13.8 years and the mean time between chest pain onset and blood samples of copeptin was 4.2 +/-2.7 hours. According to clinical decision, coronary angiography was performed in 71 patients (73.9 %) and severe stenosis diagnosed in 14 of them (14.6%). No ischemia was detected on SPECT imaging (n=25). Among the 69 patients with a negative kinetic of hs-cTnT and a negative baseline copeptin, 5 (7.4%) had a severe stenosis (NPV 0.93; 95% CI: 0.87-0.99), 4 of them related to in-stent restenosis (NPV for exclusion of native coronary stenosis: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.93-1).
We can conclude that in patients with preexisting CAD, and once Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) is excluded, copeptin increases the NPV of 
Dr. Jochen Reinöhl[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Jochen Reinöhl
Consultant and Head of the ISAH team (intervention for structural and congenital cardiovascular diseases)
Department of Cardiology and Angiology I (Medical Director: Prof. Dr. Christoph Bode)
University Heart Center Freiburg ∙ Bad Krozingen
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Reinöhl: Aortic valve stenosis is a medical condition with very high short-term mortality. Previously its only treatment – therefore the gold standard – consisted of surgical valve replacement. Since 2007 transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) can be considered alternative. Its impact on clinical practice, however, is largely unknown.
TAVR numbers rose from 144 in 2007 to 9,147 in 2013, whereas surgical aortic-valve replacement procedures only marginally decreased from 8,622 to 7,048. For both groups in-hospital mortality, as well as, the incidence of stroke, bleeding and pacemaker implantation (but not acute kidney injury) decreased.
Dr. Javed Butler[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Javed Butler MD MPH
Chief, Division of Cardiology
Stony Brook University
Health Sciences Center
SUNY at Stony Brook, NY
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Butler: There is a lot of emphasis on reducing the risk of readmission after heart failure hospitalization. The main focus is on early readmissions as the risk for readmission is highest earlier post discharge. In this study, we described the fact that certainly there is some increased risk post discharge, the majority of the risk is actually dependent on the patient and disease characteristics at the time of discharge as opposed to true reduction in risk over time, which is partially related to differential attrition of high risk patients earlier post discharge.
Dr. Sherry Grace[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Sherry L. Grace, PhD
Professor, York University
Senior Scientist, University Health Network
University of Toronto
MedicalResearch: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Grace: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality for women world-wide. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an outpatient secondary prevention program composed of structured exercise and comprehensive education and counseling.Cardiac rehabilitation participation results in lower morbidity and mortality, among other benefits. Unfortunately, women are significantly less likely to adhere to these programs than men.
While the traditional model of Cardiac rehabilitation care is a hospital-based mixed-sex program, women are the minority in such programs, and state that these programs do not meet their care preferences. Two other models of CR care have been developed: hospital-based women-only (sex-specific) and monitored home-based programs. Women’s adherence to these program models is not well known.
Cardiac Rehabilitation for her Heart Event Recovery (CR4HER) was a 3 parallel arm pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to compare women’s program adherence to traditional hospital-based CR with males and females attending (mixed-sex), home-based CR (bi-weekly phone calls), and women-only hospital-based CR. The primary outcome was program adherence operationalized as Cardiac rehabilitation site-reported percentage of prescribed sessions completed by phone or on-site, as reported by a staff member who was blind to study objectives. The secondary outcomes included functional capacity. It was hoped that by identifying the CR program model which resulted in the greatest adherence for women, their participation and potentially their cardiac outcomes could be optimized.
MedicalResearch: What are the main findings?
Dr. Grace: Similar to previous research, we found that women did not adhere very highly to the Cardiac rehabilitation programs. Half of the women dropped out of CR, and this occurred regardless of the type of program they went to. Some women did not even start 
Dr. Daniel Friedman[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Daniel Friedman, MD
Cardiology Fellow
Duke University Hospital
Durham, North Carolina
MedicalResearch: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Friedman: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been demonstrated to reduce heart failure hospitalizations, heart failure symptoms, and mortality in randomized clinical trials. However, these well-known trials either formally excluded or did not report enrollment of patients with more advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), which we defined as a glomerular filtration rate of <45ml/minute. Since advanced CKD has been associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes among patients with a variety of pacemakers and defibrillators, many have questioned whether the risks of CRT may outweigh the benefits in this population. Furthermore, many have hypothesized that the competing causes of morbidity and mortality among advanced CKD patients who meet criteria for CRT may mitigate clinical response and net benefit.
Our study assessed the comparative effectiveness of CRT with defibrillator (CRT-D) versus defibrillator alone in CRT eligible patients with a glomerular filtration rate of <60ml/minute (Stage III-V CKD, including those on dialysis). We demonstrated that CRT-D use was associated with a significant reduction in heart failure hospitalization or death in the overall population and across the spectrum of CKD. The lower rates of heart failure hospitalization or death was apparent in all subgroups we tested except for those without a left bundle branch block. Importantly, we also demonstrated that complication rates did not increase with increasing severity of CKD.
Dr. Nakharni[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Girish N. Nadkarni, MD, MPH
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Nadkarni: Cardiovascular disease is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with kidney disease. Moreover, there is a lack of good quality evidence in kidney disease patients. In addition, previous studies have shown that cardiovascular trials exclude patients with kidney disease. We wanted to analyze all of the clinical trials on acute myocardial infarctions and heart failure in the last decade and see if they continued excluding patients with kidney disease. We discovered that in 371 trials including close to six hundred thousand patients, the majority (57%) excluded patients with kidney disease. A large proportion of the trials excluded patients for non-specific reasons, rather than a prespecified threshold of kidney function and did not report kidney function at baseline. Finally, in trials that did include kidney patients and reported outcomes by 
Dr. Al-Kindi[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Sadeer G Al-Kindi, MD
Fellow, Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute
Onco-Cardiology Program, Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Center, Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute,
University Hospitals Case Medical Center
Cleveland, OH
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Al-Kindi: Cardiovascular disease and cancer are the most common causes of death in the United States. They often have the same risk factors (for example, smoking, advancing age, obesity). Many cancers are treated with drugs that can have detrimental effect on the heart thus limiting their use. Some studies have suggested that cardiovascular diseases can worsen outcomes in patients with cancer. The emergence of onco-cardiology programs led to multidisciplinary care of patients with cancer and heart disease. Given this tight relationship between cancers and cardiovascular disease, we hypothesized that heart disease and its risk factors are very common in patients diagnosed with cancer.
Medical Research: What are the main findings?
Dr. Al-Kindi: Using a very large clinical database of 1/8th of the US population, we identified patients with most common cancers that are treated with cardiotoxic medications and identified the prevalence of cardiovascular diseases. Overall, prevalence was 33% for hematologic malignancies (leukemia and lymphoma), 43% for lung cancers, 17% for breast cancers, 26% for colon cancers, 35% for renal cancers, and 26% for head and neck cancers. Peripheral artery disease, coronary artery disease and cerebrovascular diseases were the most common, followed by heart failure, and carotid artery disease. Despite the high prevalence, only about a half of these patients were on the cardiovascular medicines and half were referred to cardiologists.
Dr. Kaltman[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Jonathan Kaltman, MD
Chief, Heart Development and Structural Diseases Branch
Division of Cardiovascular Sciences
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Medical Research: What are the main findings?
Dr. Kaltman: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common birth defect but the cause for most defects is unknown. Surgery and clinical care of patients with congenital heart disease has improved survival but now we are learning that many patients have neurodevelopmental abnormalities, including learning disability and attention/behavioral issues.
Medical Research: What are the main findings?
Dr. Daniels[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Lori Daniels, MD, MAS, FACC
Professor of Medicine
Director, Coronary Care Unit
UCSD Division of Cardiology
Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center
La Jolla, CA
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Daniels: A large number of individuals who are at risk for developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) may not be identified as “at risk” by traditional screening methods. Blood-based biomarkers provide a possible way, in conjunction with traditional risk factor screening, to assess risk in individuals. Two such biomarkers which are gaining widespread attention are NT-proBNP and cardiac troponin T (TnT). NT-proBNP is secreted by cardiac muscle cells in response to stretch, while TnT is consider a marker of cardiac cellular damage. Previous studies have shown that each of these markers is associated with long-term risk of cardiovascular outcomes in the general population. Race and ethnicity have been shown to affect the levels of these markers, and whether these markers are equally predictive of future cardiovascular risk in various ethnic groups has not been well studied.
The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) is an NIH-funded, multicenter, prospective, population-based study of white, black, Hispanic, and Chinese individuals without clinical CVD at baseline. Participants had blood drawn at a baseline study visit in 2000-2002, and again several years later, in 2004-2005. They have been followed for the development of CVD since then.
The purpose of this study was to learn whether NT-proBNP (single and serial measures) and TnT are predictive of incident cardiovascular disease in a diverse cohort of 5592 participants from the MESA. We also wanted to learn whether the addition of these biomarkers to established CVD risk prediction scores, including the 2013 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Pooled Cohort Risk Equation and the Framingham Risk Score, could improve performance of the risk score.
Dr. Ambarish Pandey[/caption]
Ambarish
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Ambarish Pandey M.D.
Division of Cardiology
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, TX
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Pandey: Pulmonary artery (PA) catheters have been used for invasive bedside hemodynamic monitoring for past four decades. The ESCAPE trial, published in October 2005, demonstrated that use of Pulmonary Artery catheter was not associated with a significant improvement in clinical outcomes of patients with heart failure. Accordingly, the current ACC/AHA guidelines discourage the routine use of PA catheter for routine management of acute heart failure in absence of cardiogenic shock or respiratory failure (Class III). Despite the significant evolution of available evidence base and guideline recommendations regarding use of Pulmonary Artery catheters, national patterns of PA catheter utilization in hospitalized heart failure patients remain unknown.
In this study, we observed that use of PA catheter among patients with heart failure decline significantly in the Pre-ESCAPE era (2001 – 2006) followed by a consistent increase in its use in the Post-ESCAPE era (2007-2012). We also observed that the increase in use of Pulmonary Artery catheters is most significant among heart failure patients without underlying cardiogenic shock or respiratory failure.
Dr. Kamila Mistry[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Kamila B. Mistry, PhD MPH
Senior Advisor, Child Health and Quality Improvement
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
US Department of Health and Human Services
Rockville, MD 20857
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Mistry: This study, conducted by researchers at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), was seeking to explore what impact the Affordable Care Act (ACA) may have on the nation’s well-documented racial/ethnic disparities in insurance coverage, access to medical care, and preventive services utilization. We used pre-ACA (2005-2010) household data from AHRQ’s Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to examine patterns of coverage, access, and utilization, by race/ethnicity, for nonelderly adults who are targeted by ACA coverage expansion provisions.
Dr. Chunsheng Wang[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Chunsheng Wang, MD
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shanghai Cardiovascular Institution
and Zhongshan Hospital
Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Wang: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been widely used in high-risk patients for surgical aortic valve replacement. However, the majority of the TAVR devices were designed for aortic valve stenosis with significant valve calcification. For most of these devices, predominant aortic regurgitation remained to be a technological challenge because of questionable anchoring, which can result in a high incidence of valve migration and paravalvular leak. Consequently, the guidelines from the United States and the Europe suggest that candidates with predominant aortic regurgitation (>grade 3+) or noncalcified valve should not undergo 
Dr. González-Pacheco[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Héctor González-Pacheco MD
Coronary Care Unit, National Institute of Cardiology
Mexico City, Mexico
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. González-Pacheco: Epidemiological studies have provided robust evidence for an inverse correlation between plasma levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and cardiovascular risk. At hospital admission, a high percentage of patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have low HDL-C levels. Currently, the association of very low levels of HDL-C with early mortality in patients with ACS is still a topic of considerable interest. However, the possible mechanisms are not clear. Since an acute coronary syndrome induces an inflammatory response, and several chronic systemic diseases and acute critical illnesses with clear pro-inflammatory components have been associated with significantly reduced HDL-C levels, and investigators have shown an inverse correlation between HDL-C levels and the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, we hypothesized that reduced HDL-C levels in 
Dr. Cooper[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Lauren Cooper, MD
Fellow in Cardiovascular Diseases
Duke University Medical Center
Duke Clinical Research Institute
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Cooper: The HF-ACTION study, published in 2009, showed that exercise training is associated with reduced risk of death or hospitalization, and is a safe and effective therapy for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Subsequently, Medicare began to cover cardiac rehabilitation for patients with heart failure. However, many patients referred to an exercise training program are not fully adherent to the program. Our study looked at psychosocial reasons that may impact participation in an exercise program.
Medical Research: What are the main findings?
Dr. Cooper: We found that patients with higher levels of social support and fewer barriers to exercise exercised more than patients with lower levels of social support and more barriers to exercise. And patients who exercised less had a higher risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization compared to patients who exercised more.
Dr. Givens
Dr. Marzolini[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Susan Marzolini, R.Kin, PhD
Scientific Associate, TRI-REPS Supervisor
Toronto Rehab/UHN Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Program
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Marzolini: Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is a leading revascularization procedure for treating coronary artery disease. Despite effective revascularization, cardiovascular risk factor control through intensive lifestyle and pharmacological treatment is essential to prevent graft deterioration and progression of atherosclerosis following surgery. Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs offer structured exercise, education, interdisciplinary support, counselling, and risk reduction to promote secondary prevention. These programs have been shown to improve fitness, psychosocial well-being, and significantly reduce morbidity and mortality after CABG surgery.
However, while Canadian and international guidelines endorse “early” referral to CR post-cardiac event, actual practice is variable and delays are common
Dr. Del Gobbo[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Liana Del Gobbo PhD
Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA; and
Life Sciences Research Organization, Bethesda, MD
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Del Gobbo: Accumulating evidence suggests that nut intake lowers risk of cardiovascular disease. But the specific mechanisms by which nuts may exert beneficial effects (eg. through lowering blood cholesterol, blood pressure, inflammation, etc.) were not clear. Two prior reviews on this topic only evaluated one type of nuts, and only a few cardiovascular risk factors.
To address these knowledge gaps, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials to examine the effects of eating tree nuts (walnuts, pistachios, macadamia nuts, pecans, cashews, almonds, hazelnuts, Brazil nuts) on major cardiovascular risk factors including blood lipids (total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, triglycerides [TG]), lipoproteins (ApoA1, ApoB, ApoB100), blood pressure (systolic, SBP; diastolic, DBP), and inflammation (C-reactive protein, CRP) in adults 18 years or older without cardiovascular disease.
A daily serving of nuts (1oz serving, or 28g per day) significantly lowered total cholesterol, LDL, ApoB, and triglycerides, with no significant effects on other risk factors, such as HDL cholesterol, blood pressure or inflammation. To give you an idea of a 1oz serving size of nuts, it is about 23 almonds, 18 cashews, 21 hazelnuts, 6 Brazil nuts, 12 macadamia nuts, 14 walnut halves, 20 pecan halves, 49 pistachios.
We did not see any differences in cholesterol-lowering effects by nut type.
Dr. Lubitz[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Carrie C. Lubitz, MD, MPH
Assistant Professor of Surgery, Harvard Medical School
Senior Scientist, Institute for Technology Assessment
Attending Surgeon, Mass General/North Shore Center for Outpatient Care
Danvers, Massachusetts
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Lubitz: Given reported estimates of resistant hypertension and the proportion of resistant hypertensive patients with primary hyperaldosteronism (PA) - the most common form of secondary hypertension caused by a nodule or hyperplasia of the adrenal glands – we estimate over a million Americans have undiagnosed PA. Furthermore, it has been shown that patients with PA with the same blood pressure as comparable patients with primary hypertension have worse outcomes.
In our study, we found that identifying and appropriately treating patients with PA can improve long-term outcomes in patients in a large number of patients who have resistant hypertension.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Giuseppe Andò
University of Messina, Messina, Italy
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Andò: Patients’ preference for radial access for coronary angiography and percutaneous intervention is paralleled by an almost complete abolition of access-site bleeding. Given the deleterious impact of any clinically relevant bleeding event on short- and long-term outcomes, the use of radial access should translate into a reduction in net adverse events, especially in patients with high risk of bleeding such as those with an acute coronary syndrome. Nonetheless, studies conducted over the past decade by pioneers of 
Dr. Barnes[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Geoffrey Barnes, MD, MSc
Clinical Lecturer
Cardiovascular Medicine and Vascular Medicine
University of Michigan Health System
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Barnes: Although warfarin has been the primary anticoagulant used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation for over 60 years, four new direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been introduced into the market since 2010. Dabigatran, which directly inhibits thrombin, was found to have better prevention of ischemic stroke and a significant reduction in hemorrhagic stroke (bleeding strokes) for patients with 
