04 Sep No Evidence of Worse STEMI Outcomes During Off-Hours
Posted at 00:37h
in Author Interviews, Brigham & Women's - Harvard, Heart Disease, JACC, Outcomes & Safety, Surgical Research
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Senthil Selvaraj, MD, MA and Deepak L. Bhatt, MD, MPH
Brigham and Women’s Hospital Heart & Vascular Center and
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: There has been significant controversy in the effect of off-hours presentation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Off-hours presentation has been associated with longer treatment time, an independent predictor of worse outcomes in STEMI, though a number of other studies have shown no difference as well. Moreover, little data has been generated from clinical trials, which has the advantage of comprehensive and adjudicated outcomes.
In our analysis of nearly 2,000 STEMI patients from the CHAMPION PHOENIX study (a randomized, controlled trial of cangrelor in percutaneous coronary intervention), we found that off-hours presentation was not associated with worse efficacy or safety outcomes at 48 hours or 30 days. More specifically, outcomes not typically reported in registry data, such as ischemia-driven revascularization and stent thrombosis, were not significantly different between the groups. Interestingly, treatment times were actually faster in the “off-hours” group as well.






















