15 Feb Asthma May Raise Risk of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture
Posted at 20:26h
in AHA Journals, Asthma, Author Interviews, Brigham & Women's - Harvard, Heart Disease
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
[caption id="attachment_21625" align="alignleft" width="300"]
Guo-Ping Shi, ScD and Dr. Cong-Lin LiuCardiovascular Medicine
Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Boston, MA[/caption] Guo-Ping Shi, ScD and Dr. Cong-Lin Liu Cardiovascular Medicine Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, MA Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Response: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (commonly called AAA) is an aortic disease that affects 1~5% men above 50, depending on the countries and regions. There is currently no effective medication or prevention besides surgical repair. Fast growth or unstable AAA often leads to aortic rupture and sudden death. Although ultrasound can be used to monitor the size and growth of AAA, our current annual health examination system in the US does not include this service. We report that mast cells are essential to AAA (J Clin Invest. 2007;117:3359-68). These cells are predominant immune cells in allergic asthmatic lungs from humans and experimental animals. Plasma immunoglobulin E (IgE) level elevation is also a signature of allergic asthma. We report that IgE contributes to experimental AAA by activating mast cells, as well as other immune cells such as macrophages and T cells (EMBO Mol Med. 2014;6:952-69). Direct evidence from our recent study demonstrates that production of allergic asthma in mice doubles the AAA sizes in experimental mice (Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016;36:69-77). All these prior studies suggest a role of allergic asthma to the pathogenesis of AAA. In this human population-based nationwide case-control study (Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016 Feb 11. [Epub ahead of print]), we reported two major findings: First, among 15,942 Danish AAA patients selected from 1996 to 2012, compared to those who did not have asthma, patients who had hospital-diagnosed asthma within the past 12 months had 60% more risk to experience aortic rupture, and those who had hospital-diagnosed asthma within the past 6 months had greater than 100% more risk to experience aortic rupture. Further, patients who received anti-asthmatic treatment, as evidence of asthma, also had 20~50% more risk of experiencing aortic rupture than those who did not have record of anti-asthmatic treatment, depending on how recent the patients received the treatments. Second, among a general men population aged from 65 to 74, patients who used bronchodilating drugs to treat asthma or reversible obstructive pulmonary disease had 45% more risk to have AAA compared with those who never used bronchodilators. This risk was not affected by smoking or other major AAA risk factors.
Prof. Ian Wong[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Professor Ian C K Wong
Fellow of Royal Pharmaceutical Society
Fellow of Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (Honorary)
Fellow of the Higher Education Academy
Chair in Pharmacy Practice
Head of Research Department of Practice and Policy
UCL School of Pharmacy
London
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Wong: Previous studies had showed an increased cardiovascular risk associated with clarithromycin (a widely used antibiotic) but the duration of effect remained unclear. Therefore, we conducted this study to investigate the duration of cardiovascular adverse effect provided that the risk exists after patients receiving clarithromycin in Hong Kong. We used three study designs to examine the association (temporal relationship) between clarithromycin and cardiovascular adverse outcomes such as myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, stroke, cardiac mortality at different time points.
Dr. Frank Rybicki[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Frank J. Rybicki, MD, PhD
Professor, Chair and Chief, Department of Radiology
The University of Ottawa, Faculty of Medicine and
The Ottawa Hospital
Editor-in-Chief, 3D Printing in Medicine
Medical Research: What is the background for this document?
Dr. Rybicki: This document represents a conglomeration of the approach to appropriateness of three large medical professional groups. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria® are evidence based guidelines to assist referring physicians to order the most appropriate imaging test for a wide range of clinical scenarios. The Appropriateness Criteria are divided by organ section, and while they include emergent imaging studies, there is not a single publication to provide imaging guidance for patients who present to the emergency room with chest pain. The American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria provides evidence based data for a very large gamut of cardiovascular conditions. These guidelines include emergent cardiovascular imaging; however the Appropriate Use Criteria are divided by modality and like the ACR have not specially addressed this important, high risk patient population. The American College of Emergency Physicians, a key stakeholder group that represents referring physicians, has developed a large number of guidelines but also has not organized this group of imaging recommendations. Thus, the background of this document was a joint effort among all three societies to update, harmonize, and publish contemporary guidelines that can be readily incorporated into clinical practice but also provide standards for a large fraction of patients who come to the emergency room with chest pain who require imaging to evaluate for a life threatening diagnosis.
Medical Research: What types of chest pain conditions are covered by these guidelines?
Dr. Rybicki: Based on the background as noted above, the Writing Group for this important document included cardiologists, emergency physicians, and radiologists. Since the group was charged with describing common clinical scenarios seen in contemporary practice, there are four entry points for chest pain conditions. They are as follows:
Dr. Yitschak Biton[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Yitschak (Yitsik) Biton, MD
Postdoctoral Research Fellow
University of Rochester Medical Center
Saunders Research Building
Heart Research Follow-Up Program
Rochester, NY
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Biton: Patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction have increased risk for sudden cardiac death due to ventricular arrhythmias. The causes of these arrhythmias are thought to be adverse left ventricular remodeling and scarring. Cardiac resynchronization therapy has been previously shown to reverse the adverse process of remodeling and induce reduction in cardiac chamber volumes. Relative wall thickness is a measure of the remodeling process, and it could be classified into normal, eccentric and concentric. In our study we showed that the degree relative wall thickness in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and eccentric hypertrophy is inversely associated with the risk of ventricular arrhythmias. Furthermore we showed the CRT treated patients who had increase in relative wall thickness (became less eccentric) had lower risk for ventricular arrhythmias.
Prof. De Caterina[/caption]
Prof. Raffaele De Caterina M.D., Ph.D
University Cardiology Division G. d'Annunzio University
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. De Caterina: There is uncertainty on how to predict bleeding upon treatment with anticoagulants, because bleeding risk scores and thromboembolic risk score fare very similarly in predicting bleeding, making the net clinical benefit difficult to assess in the single patient. Here we find that a history of bleeding – even minor bleeding – has an important prognostic value on the risk of future bleeding – virtually all sorts of future bleeding, with the notable exception of intracranial hemorrhage. Some novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), such as apixaban, studied here, reduce the risk of major bleeding, and appear to benefit independent of the bleeding history.
Dr. Ajay Dharod[/caption]
Dr. Islam Elgendy[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr.James DiNicolantonio[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
James J. DiNicolantonio, PharmD
Associate Editor BMJ Open Heart
Cardiovascular Research Scientist
Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. DiNicolantonio: We comprehensively reviewed the literature looking at the cardiovascular effects of saturated fat and compared them with refined sugars (sucrose and high-fructose corn syrup). Our main finding is that saturated fat per se is not necessarily unhealthy. Importantly, people eat foods, not saturated fat, and depending on what foods are consumed determines if saturated fat associates with health risk. For example, the consumption of processed meat is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, whereas dairy is not. Importantly, the replacement of saturated fat with refined sugars seems to increase the risk of myocardial infarction. Hence, reducing added sugars should be the main focus rather than reducing saturated fat, as the latter could translate to reductions in healthy whole foods that just so happen to also be high in saturated fat (but also provide other healthy fats).
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Tanush Gupta, MD
Chief Resident & Instructor of Medicine and
Prakash Harikrishnan, MD
Fellow in Cardiology
New York Medical College at
Westchester Medical Center
Valhalla, NY
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Response: Complete heart block (CHB) is a relatively frequent complication in patients hospitalized with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Patients who develop complete heart block in the setting of STEMI have a 3- to 5-fold increase in in-hospital mortality compared to those without CHB. However, most of the existing reports on CHB complicating STEMI are from the pre-thrombolytic and thrombolytic era in the 1980s and 1990s, before the widespread use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and advent of modern adjunctive medical therapies.
Hence, the purpose of this investigation was to examine the association of complete heart block with in-hospital outcomes in patients hospitalized with STEMI and to examine the temporal trends in the incidence and outcomes of CHB complicating STEMI using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) databases from 2003 to 2012.
Dr. Victor Serebruany[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Sunil Sharma[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Sunil Sharma MD, FAASM
Associate Professor of Medicine
Director, Pulmonary Sleep Medicine
Associate Director, Jefferson Sleep Disorders Center
Thomas Jefferson University and Hospitals
Philadelphia, PA 19107
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Sharma: Congestive heart failure (CHF) is the most common cause of hospital admission and readmissions in United States. More health care dollars are spent on CHF than any other diagnosis. A large chunk of this cost is due to hospital admission. An estimated 50% of the CHF patients are readmitted within 6 months of discharge. The recent Protection Affordable Care Act (ACA) imposes penalties on hospitals for readmissions within first 30-days. It is therefore imperative to find ways to impact the natural history of the disease.
Sleep disordered breathing is a common disorder associated with