Author Interviews, JAMA, Outcomes & Safety, University of Michigan / 03.02.2015
Participation in Hospital Quality Reporting Program Did Not Improve Outcomes
Nicholas Osborne, M.D., M.S
Vascular Surgery Fellow
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Osborne: The American College of Surgeons launched the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) in the early 2000s. This program collects and reports surgical outcomes to participating hospitals. One retrospective study of participating hospitals in the ACS-NSQIP reported improvements in risk-adjusted outcomes with participation. This study, however, did not compare ACS-NSQIP hospitals to control hospitals. The purpose of our study was to compare ACS-NSQIP to similar non-participating hospitals over time and determine whether participation in the ACS-NSQIP was associated with improved outcomes.
MedicalResearch.com: What are the main findings?
Dr. Osborne: When comparing hospitals participating in a national quality reporting program (ACS-NSQIP) to similar hospitals, there is no appreciable improvement in outcomes (mortality, morbidity, readmissions or cost) outside of pre-existing trends across all hospitals. In other words, Hospitals nationwide were improving over this same time period and ACS-NSQIP hospitals did not improve above and beyond these existing trends.
(more…)