Dr. Daria Van Tyne[/caption]
Dr. Daria Van Tyne, PhD
The Gilmore Lab
Department of Ophthalmology
Harvard Medical School
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
Boston, Massachusetts
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: A specific clone of E. coli, type ST131, which produces an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL – an enzyme that inactivates many penicillin-type antibiotics), has rapidly spread around the globe to become the leading cause of multidrug-resistant, non-intestinal E. coli infection. Despite this, E. coli is a rare cause of infection of the cornea. A patient was recently seen at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary with a severe E. coli infection of the cornea, and the large number of antibiotic resistances of this strain tipped us off to the possibility that it might be the highly virulent ST131 ESBL type. By sequencing the DNA of its genome, we found that it was indeed ST131 ESBL E. coli. Moreover, we discovered a new mutation in this strain that allows it to produce a slimy outer coating on its surface. This slime layer, or capsule, makes the bacteria more resistant to removal by phagocytic cells of the immune system. The slime layer also makes these particular colonies appear different on a special type of agar that contains the dye Congo Red.
Dr. Ilana B. Richman[/caption]
Ilana B. Richman, MD
Palo Alto VA Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research/Center for Health Policy
Department of Medicine
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: In November of 2015, researchers published results from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). This large, NIH-funded study compared a systolic blood pressure target of 120 mm Hg vs 140 mm Hg among hypertensive, nondiabetic patients at elevated risk for cardiovascular disease. SPRINT reported a 25% reduction in the rate of cardiovascular disease and death among those treated to a lower target. Those treated to a lower target blood pressure, though, experienced certain adverse events more frequently.
Our cost effectiveness analysis asked two questions: given the potential risks and benefits described in SPRINT, does achieving a lower systolic blood pressure result in net benefit over the course of a lifetime? And if it does, how much would it cost, compared to standard treatment? We found that achieving a lower blood pressure target does result in a net benefit, with a gain of about 0.9 years of life (quality adjusted) among those treated to a lower target compared to those treated to a standard target. This gain, though, required some investment. We found that treating to a lower blood pressure target cost $23,777 per quality-adjusted life year gained. Compared to other commonly used interventions here in the US, this would be considered an excellent value.
Dr. Gillian D. Sanders-Schmidler[/caption]
Gillian D. Sanders-Schmidler Ph.D.
Professor of Medicine
Duke Evidence Synthesis Group, Director
Duke Evidence-based Practice Center, Director
Duke Clinical Research Institute
Duke University
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: In 1996, the original panel on cost effectiveness in health and medicine published recommendations for the use of cost effectiveness analysis. During the 20 years since the original panel’s report, the field of cost-effectiveness analysis has advanced in important ways and the need to deliver health care efficiently has only grown. In 2012 the Second Panel on Cost Effectiveness in health and Medicine was formed with a goal of reviewing and updating the recommendations.
This paper summarizes those recommendations. This process provided an opportunity for the Panel to reflect on the evolution of cost-effectiveness analysis and to provide guidance for the next generation of practitioners and consumers.
Dr. R. Grant Steen[/caption]
R. Grant Steen, PhD
Medical Affairs,
Bioventus LLC
Durham, North Carolina
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: When we started this research, it was really only guesswork as to how big a problem fracture nonunion really is. What we've done is to work with an enormous database of patient health claims, with two goals.
First, we wanted to characterize how common fracture nonunion is among patients across a wide age range.
Second, we wanted to identify risk factors that make a patient more likely to have problems healing.
We've now succeeded in both aims. We know that roughly 5% of fracture patients will go to nonunion, and we know a whole host of risk factors that predispose them to do so.
Most of the risk factors that we've identified—with a few exceptions—would not be a surprise to physicians who treat fracture patients. However, what we've done is to put all of these risk factors in a broader context, so that we know which risk factors are most important and which are less so.
For example, it has been known for a long time that smoking is a risk factor for nonunion. What we've shown is that, in the scheme of things, it's not all that important. Let me be more precise here, because this is an important point. If all you know about a patient is that they smoke, we've shown that smoking is associated with a 62% increase in risk of nonunion. That's a lot. But, as you learn more about that patient and can factor that new knowledge into a risk prediction, it turns out that smoking, all by itself, increases the risk of nonunion by only about 20%. However, smoking is a surrogate marker for a range of other risk factors that also increase risk, including male gender, cardiovascular disease, obesity, vitamin D deficiency, alcoholism, and so on. Once you factor these separate risk factors into your new nonunion prediction, you have a much more nuanced—and probably much more accurate—prediction of nonunion risk.
Dr. Andrew Eppstein[/caption]
Andrew C. Eppstein, MD, FACS
Assistant Professor of Clinical Surgery
Indiana University School of Medicine
Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery
Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center
Indianapolis, Indiana
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: A few years ago we encountered long wait times for patients undergoing elective general surgery in our tertiary care VA medical center. Demand had grown and our existing systems were not able to accommodate surgical patients in a timely fashion. By fiscal year (FY) 2012, our wait times averaged 33 days, though patients with malignancies would be moved to the head of the line, pushing more elective cases further back.
To address rising demand and worsening wait times, our Surgery Service convened an analysis of our processes using Lean methodology in collaboration with the Systems Redesign Service. Multidisciplinary meetings were held in 2013 to analyze inefficiencies in the current system and ways to address them to create a streamlined, ideal system. The collaborations included surgeons, nurses, ancillary staff, operating room and sterile processing staff, and hospital administration. Projects were rolled out stepwise in mid-2013 under General Surgery, the busiest surgical service at our institution.
We noted a sharp decline in patient wait times after initiation of reforms such as improved OR flexibility, scheduling process changes, standardization of work within the department, and improved communication practices. These wait times dropped to 26 days in FY 2013 and further to 12 days in FY 2014, while operating volume and overall outpatient evaluations increased, with decreased no-shows to clinic. Our decreased wait times were sustained through the remainder of the observed period.
Dr. Conny Vrieling[/caption]
Conny Vrieling, M.D., Ph.D.
Radiation Oncologist
Clinique des Grangettes
Geneva
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: In the early ’90s, the EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) ran the “boost no-boost” trial, randomizing 5569 early-stage breast cancer patients, treated with breast-conserving surgery and whole-breast irradiation, between no boost and a 16-Gy boost. A third of the patients were included in a central pathology review. The 10-year follow-up results of this subpopulation showed that young age and high-grade invasive carcinoma were the most important risk factors for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR).
In this study, we re-analyzed with long-term follow-up the pathological prognostic factors related to IBTR, with a special focus on the evolution of these effects over time.
Dr. Francisco Garcia[/caption]
Dr. Francisco García M.D. M.P.H.
Task Force member and
Director and Chief medical officer at
Pima County Department of Health
Tucson, AZ
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Tuberculosis infection is one of the most common infectious diseases in the world.
Although less common in the United States, many people still become infected every year and are at risk of getting sick and spreading the infection to others. We know there are effective screening tests that can detect latent tuberculosis infection before people become sick with active tuberculosis disease. Additionally, there are effective treatments to prevent people from progressing from latent tuberculosis infection to active tuberculosis disease.
Thus, for people with increased risk of contracting tuberculosis, the Task Force recommends screening for latent tuberculosis infection.
People who are considered at increased risk include those who were born in or have lived in countries where tuberculosis is highly prevalent, or who have lived in congregate settings where exposure to tuberculosis is more likely, such as homeless shelters or correctional facilities.
Dr. Kevin Whitehead[/caption]
Dr. Kevin J. Whitehead MD
Adjunct Associate Professor, Pediatrics
Associate Professor, Internal Medicine
University of Utah
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (or Osler-Weber-Rendu Syndrome) is a genetic vascular malformation syndrome that results in arteriovenous malformations. This syndrome is found in 1:5000 individuals, and is inherited in autosomal dominant fashion. It is often under diagnosed by the medical community (some estimate that 90% of patients do not know that they are affected).
In the skin and mucous membranes small AVMs - termed telangiectasias - form, and they have the potential to rupture and bleed. This happens most commonly in the nose, and 95% of patients with HHT have recurrent nose bleeding (epistaxis). While other dangerous internal organ AVMs also form, epistaxis is the most important determinant of quality of life for these patients. This epistaxis can lead to anemia, heart failure and rarely death. Patients often seek therapy for epistaxis, but cautery or laser treatment of the telangiectasias tends to provide only temporary benefit. Definitive therapy to eliminate epistaxis requires surgical closure of the nasal passages, and is too drastic for most patients.
We sought to test medical therapy for HHT-related epistaxis with our best candidate drugs in nose spray form. The drugs with the most anecdotal support include bevacizumab (an anti-angiogenic drug), estriol (an estrogen), and tranexamic acid (an inhibitor of fibrinolysis). Our patients received a nose spray with one of these drugs or a saline placebo and used two sprays in each nostril daily for 12 weeks and recorded their nose bleed frequency and duration in a daily diary.
Dr. Brandon Hyunseok Kim[/caption]
Brandon Hyunseok Kim, M.D., MPH
Internal Medicine Resident
Rutgers New Jersey Medical School
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: The background of this study was to investigate the time trends in the prevalence of celiac disease and gluten-free diet in the United States using most recent 6-year National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey. Previous studies using narrow populations or old study period mainly before mid 2000s suggested increasing prevalence of celiac disease. At the same time, there is a current popular trend of people following gluten-free diets beyond what would be expected if it were solely due to the increasing prevalence of celiac disease.
Dr. Matt Maciejewski[/caption]
Matthew Leonard Maciejewski, PhD
Professor in the Division of General Internal Medicine
Department of Medicine
Duke University School of Medicine
Research Career Scientist and Director of the Health Economics and Policy Unit in the Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care
Durham VA Medical Center
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: No study based on a US cohort undergoing current procedures has examined weight change comparing surgical patients and nonsurgical patients for as long as we have. This is the first study to report 10-year outcomes on gastric bypass patients and compare them to matched patients who did not get surgery. At 1 year, gastric bypass patients lost 31% of their baseline weight compared controls who only lost 1.1% of their baseline weight. At 10 years, gastric bypass had lost 28% of their baseline weight.
We also compared weight loss at 4 years for Veterans who received the 3 most common procedures (gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and adjustable gastric banding). At 4 years, patients undergoing gastric bypass lost more weight than patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy or gastric banding. Given that few high quality studies have examined sleeve gastrectomy to 4 years, the 4-year sleeve outcomes contribute to filling this important evidence gap as the sleeve gastrectomy is now the most commonly performed bariatric procedure worldwide.
Dr. Marlous Hall[/caption]
Dr Marlous Hall PhD
Senior Epidemiologist
Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: It is well known that death rates following heart attacks have fallen considerably over recent decades. Many studies have looked at the effect of medications and invasive strategies, and their association with better clinical outcomes is clear.
However, a big question remains: why have heart attack deaths fallen? Is it due to increased use of medications and treatment, is the risk of patients simply lower over time due to things like earlier diagnosis or are patients generally healthier with fewer comorbidities such as diabetes? Answering this is not straightforward - as gold standard studies like clinical trials on historic data cannot be done.
An alternative approach is to look for patterns in data observed from routine care to look at all these factors together. This study used a large and rich dataset covering heart attack care in the UK (Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP)). This dataset was linked to outcome data from the Office for National Statistics to allow us to look at all the different factors that could influence the change in mortality over time.
Dr. Daniel Morgan[/caption]
Daniel J. Morgan M.D., M.S
Associate Professor
Epidemiology & Public Health
University of Maryland School of Medicine
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Physicians are generally taught if a treatment is indicated, not how well the treatment works. Although this has been part of evidence based medical training, doctors still perform poorly with ability to understand risk and how treatment limits risk (Bayesian reasoning). Many publications focus on relative risk reduction which inflates the perception of an effect over the more accurate absolute risk reduction.
Dr. Laura Van't Leer[/caption]
Prof. Laura van ’t Veer, PhD
Leader, Breast Oncology Program, and Director, Applied Genomics, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
Angela and Shu Kai Chan Endowed Chair in Cancer Research
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: MINDACT was designed to involve only patients with node negative and 1 to 3 positive lymph node breast cancer. Node negative breast cancer is a cancer that has not spread to the surrounding lymph nodes and therefore has a lower risk of recurrence. Scientists have also demonstrated that breast cancer which has spread to 1 to 3 lymph nodes may behave like node negative breast cancer. Patients with either node negative cancer or with a cancer that involves 1-3 lymph nodes are often prescribed chemotherapy, although physicians believe that approximately 15% of them do not require such treatment.
MINDACT provides the highest level of evidence to show that using MammaPrint® can substantially reduce the use of chemotherapy in patients with node-negative and 1-to-3 node positive breast cancer – in other words, it can identify patients with these types of breast cancer who can safely be spared a treatment that may cause significant side effects, and will offer no to very little benefit.
Leni van Doorn[/caption]
Leni van Doorn, MSc
Department of Medical Oncology
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute
Rotterdam, the Netherlands
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: The common cancer treatment capecitabine, a regular treatment for patients mostly diagnosed with breast-, colon- or gastic cancer, induces hand foot syndrome (HFS). HFS is a cutaneous condition that may lead to red palms and blisters in approximately 50% to 60% of the patients and is believed to result in the loss of fingerprints. This fingerprint loss has been described sporadically in the literature.
The main aim of our prospective study was to have a closer look of the association between hand foot syndrome and the loss of fingerprints.
Dr. Adam Castano[/caption]
Adam Castano, M.D., M.S.
Division of Cardiology
Columbia University Medical Center
New York Presbyterian Hospital
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) is an increasingly recognized cause of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Traditionally, the gold standard for diagnosis has required an endomyocardial biopsy coupled with either immunohistochemistry or mass spectroscopy. These specialized tests are only performed at centers with experienced satff, do not yield prognostically useful information, may be inadvisable for frail older adults, and often present logistical challenges that lead to delayed care.
Fortunately, single center studies have demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy using technetium 99m pyrophosphate (Tc99mPYP) cardiac imaging for noninvasively detecting ATTR-CA and differentiating it from another major type of cardiac amyloidosis called light chain (AL). But the diagnostic accuracy of this technique in a multicenter study and the association of Tc99mPYP myocardial uptake with survival were not known prior to this study.
Therefore, we assessed in a multicenter study Tc99mPYP cardiac imaging as a diagnostic tool and its association with survival. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 229 patients evaluated at 3 academic specialty centers for cardiac amyloidosis and also underwent Tc99mPYP cardiac imaging. We measured retention of Tc99mPYP in the heart using a semiquantitative visual score (range 0-3) and a more quantitative heart-to-contralateral (H/CL) ratio calculated as total counts in a region of interest over the heart divided by background counts in an identical size region of interest over the contralateral chest. The outcome measured was time to death after Tc99mPYP imaging.
Dr. Aaron Mitchell[/caption]
Dr. Aaron Mitchell MD
Hematology/Oncology Fellow
University North Carolina
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: It is well known that many physicians work with the pharmaceutical industry. In some cases, this can create conflicts of interest with physicians' other responsibilities. The Open Payments law, passed as part of the Affordable Care Act, recently made these relationships public, which now allows us to study them more systematically.
Dr. Lisa Ishii[/caption]
Lisa Earnest Ishii, M.D.
Associate Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryJohns Hopkins School of Medicine
Baltimore Maryland 21287
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Hair transplantation for men suffering from male pattern hair loss is a common procedure to improve their appearance. However, to the best of our knowledge the impact of the procedure for men with hair loss had never been clearly demonstrated.
We showed, for the first time, that men who undergo the procedure can have real improvements in attractiveness, age, and the appearance of successfulness as perceived by the casual observer in society.
Fan Fan Hou MD
Chief, Division of Nephrology, Nanfang Hospital
Professor of Medicine, Southern Medical University
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Previous trials (HOST and DIVINe) of folic acid therapy in CKD patients were conducted in patients with advanced CKD and treated with super-high dose of vitamin B or with cyanocobalamin that has been shown to be renal toxic. The current study sought to evaluated the efficacy of folic acid therapy without cyanocobalamin on renal outcomes in patients without folic acid fortification and across a spectrum of renal function at baseline from normal to moderate CKD.
We found that treatment with enalapril-folic acid, as compared with enalapril alone, reduced the risk of progression of CKD by 21% and the rate of eGFR decline by 10% in hypertensive patients. More importantly, the presence of CKD at baseline was a significant modifier of the treatment effect (p for interaction = 0.01). Patients with CKD benefited most from the folic acid therapy, with a 56% and 44% reduction in the risk for progression of CKD and the rate of eGFR decline, respectively. In contrast, the renal protective effect in those without CKD was nominal.
Dr. Jeffrey Munson[/caption]
Jeffrey Munson, MD, MSCE
Assistant Professor
The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice
Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine
Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Fragility fractures due to osteoporosis are a common and costly event among older Americans. Patients who experience one fragility fracture are at increased risk to have a second fracture. Our group is interested in exploring ways in which the risk of a second fracture could be reduced.
In this paper, we studied prescription drug use both before and after fracture. We know many prescription drugs have been shown to increase the risk of fracture, but we don’t know whether doctors try to reduce the use of these drugs after a fracture has occurred. Our study was designed to answer this question.
Dr. Rachel Patzer[/caption]
Rachel Patzer, PhD, MPH
Director of Health Services Research,
Emory Transplant Center
Assistant Professor
Emory University School of Medicine
Department of Surgery
Division of Transplantation
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Patients with End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) make up less than 1% of all Medicare patients, but account for more than 7% of all Medicare expenses. Patients with ESRD have the highest risk of hospitalization of any patient with a chronic disease, and while hospital admissions have decreased over the last several years, emergency department utilization for this patient population has increased by 3% in the last 3 years. The purpose of the study we conducted was to describe the clinical and demographic characteristics associated with emergency department utilization.
MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Mizuki Nishino, MD MPH Department of Radiology Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston, Massachusetts MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? Response: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors including PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors have brought remarkable advances in treatment of cancer patients. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors are associated with a unique set of adverse events,...