Author Interviews, Hospital Acquired, Infections / 14.05.2016
Fluorescent Marker May Help Improve Cleanliness of Hospital Surfaces
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
[caption id="attachment_24356" align="alignleft" width="100"]
Dr. Gabriele Messina[/caption]
Gabriele Messina, MD Dr.PH MSc
Research Professor of Public Health
University of Siena
Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine
Area of Public Health. Room: 2057
Siena, Italy
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Messina: Studies conducted in the 1970s and 1980s conferred to environmental surfaces a marginal role in the transmission of health care associated infections (HAIs). Today, it is demonstrated that several pathogens such as C. difficile, VRE (Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus) and MRSA (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) can survive even for months on inanimate surfaces. Up to 40% of HAIs can be spread by the hands of doctors and hospital staff after touching infected patient and/or contaminated surfaces; furthermore, people hospitalized in rooms previously occupied by patients infected by microorganism that can persist on surfaces present an increased risk to develop HAIs.
Dr. Gabriele Messina[/caption]
Gabriele Messina, MD Dr.PH MSc
Research Professor of Public Health
University of Siena
Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine
Area of Public Health. Room: 2057
Siena, Italy
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Messina: Studies conducted in the 1970s and 1980s conferred to environmental surfaces a marginal role in the transmission of health care associated infections (HAIs). Today, it is demonstrated that several pathogens such as C. difficile, VRE (Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus) and MRSA (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) can survive even for months on inanimate surfaces. Up to 40% of HAIs can be spread by the hands of doctors and hospital staff after touching infected patient and/or contaminated surfaces; furthermore, people hospitalized in rooms previously occupied by patients infected by microorganism that can persist on surfaces present an increased risk to develop HAIs.






Dr. Halwani[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Muhammad A. Halwani, MSc, PhD
Faculty of Medicine, Al Baha University
Al Baha, Saudi Arabia.
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: The study idea was based on examining the current rate of post cesarean section infections that were detected in the hospital at the time. It was hypothesized that the detected infections were actually less than the real number identified. Therefore, we challenged the traditional surveillance method that was applied in the hospital with a new enhanced methodology which is telephone follow-ups for patients who under go C-section operations.
Our main finding proved that this new applied method was able to detect more cases than the traditional one. Using phone calls as a gold standard, the sensitivity of the standard methodology to capture SSI after cesarean increased to 73.3% with the new methodology identifying an extra five cases. These patients represented 26.3% (5 of 19) of all the patients who developed SSI. In other words, for every 100 C-section procedures there were 2.6% missed cases which the new method was able to detect. The duration of the calls ranged from 1 to 5 minutes and were well received by the patients.
Prof. Paludan[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Professor Søren Riis Paludan DMSc, PhD
Department of Biomedicine
Aarhus University
Denmark
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Prof. Paluden: We were interested in understanding the first immune reactions that occur when an organism meets an infectious agent (virus or bacteria).
The main finding is that we have identified an immune reaction that is activated as the microbe disturbed the mucus layer at mucosal surfaces. This is an immune reaction occuring earlier than what has been thought previously, and may represent a mechanism that enables the organism to fight most microbes that we meet without mounting strong immune responses. This is important, since strong immune reactions - in addition to contributing to elimination of microbes - also have negative effects such as fever, etc.
Prof. Maillard[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Prof. Jean-Yves Maillard
Professor of Pharmaceutical Microbiology
College of Biomedical and Life Sciences
Cardiff School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Cardiff University
Cardiff United Kingdom
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Prof. Maillard: Environmental surfaces in healthcare and other settings become contaminated with a variety of infectious agents which may survive long enough to infect susceptible hosts, either directly or through secondary vehicles such as hands. Therefore, routine decontamination of environmental surfaces, in particular those that are frequently touched, is crucial to reduce the risk of infections. Such decontamination is often performed by wiping the target surface with disinfectant-soaked or pre-wetted wipes. However, the label claims of wipes marketed for this purpose are often based upon testing that does not reflect their field use, where contact times are frequently no more than a few seconds with wide variations in the pressure applied during wiping. In addition, wipes impregnated with a disinfectant or detergent can potentially transfer microbial contaminants to a wider area, when the same wipe is used on multiple surfaces.
A device called the ‘Wiperator’ was invented to address these issues. It can be used to test wipes with predetermined pressures, wiping times and number of wiping strokes, using a standardized rotary action. It can not only assess the decontaminating efficiency of the test wipe, but also its ability to transfer the acquired contamination to clean surfaces. The test procedure developed using the device is now a standard (E2967) of ASTM International, a highly-respected standards-setting organization.
The Wiperator was used in a multi-laboratory collaborative to test commercially-available wipes for their ability to decontaminate metal disks that had been experimentally-contaminated with vegetative bacteria representing healthcare-associated pathogens. The used wipes were subsequently tested for their potential to transfer viable bacteria to clean surfaces. The contact time for wiping and transfer was 10 seconds. Only one of the wipes tested reduced the contamination to an undetectable level while not transferring any viable bacteria to a clean surface. All others left behind detectable levels of contamination on the wiped disks and transferred the contamination to clean surfaces.














