Author Interviews, Critical Care - Intensive Care - ICUs, Emergency Care / 19.03.2017
Risk Factors for Unplanned Transfer to the ICU after ED Admission
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Marleen Boerma MD
Department of Emergency Medicine
Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital
Tilburg, The Netherlands
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Unplanned Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission has been used as a surrogate marker of adverse events, and is used by the Australian Council of Healthcare Accreditation as a reportable quality indicator. If we can identify independent variables predicting deterioration which require ICU transfer within 24 hours after emergency department (ED) admission, direct ICU admission should be considered. This may improve patient safety and reduce adverse events by appropriate disposition of patients presenting to the ED.
This study shows that there were significantly more hypercapnia patients in the ICU admission group (n=17) compared to the non-ICU group (n=5)(p=0.028). There were significantly greater rates of tachypnea in septic patients (p=0.022) and low oxygen saturation for patients with pneumonia (p=0.045). The level of documentation of respiratory rate was poor.









Dr. Angela Sauaia[/caption]
Angela Sauaia MD PhD
Professor of Public Health, Medicine, and Surgery
University of Colorado Denver
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Authors: Americans mourn firearm related fatalities every day. Mass shootings are just the tip of the iceberg of the daily tragedy witnessed by trauma surgeons in emergency rooms. Industries strive to reduce the perils associated with motor vehicles, pedestrian and bicycles accidents, just to cite a few, through technology and education. Firearms move in the exact opposite direction. They are becoming progressively more dangerous and we have done little in terms of education to prevent accidents. The same trend is true for monitoring statistics. It is not difficult to obtain statistics on which type of car was associated with more accidents or fatalities. Conversely, trying to obtain data on which type of firearms are more likely to result in accidents or death is extremely difficult. We used the best data we could find and found that, contrary to every other injury mechanism, firearm injuries are becoming more lethal. In simple words, if you get into a car accident today, you are more likely to survive it due to improvements in trauma care and safety of vehicles than 10 years ago. On the other hand, if you get shot today, you are more likely to die than if you were shot 10 years ago, despite our excellent trauma care.
Dr. William Eggleston[/caption]
William Eggleston, PharmD
Fellow in Clinical Toxicology/Emergency Medicine
Upstate Medical University
Upstate New York Poison Center
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Eggleston: The case series describes two deaths associated with loperamide abuse with supportive post-mortem findings. It adds to the growing body of literature reporting cardiac toxicity after loperamide abuse and demonstrates the deadly consequences. It also highlights the growing trend of loperamide abuse amongst opioid addicted patients looking to get high or stave off withdrawal symptoms.
MedicalResearch.com: What should readers take away from your report?
Dr. Eggleston: Readers should recognize that loperamide is an OTC opioid medication that acts similarly to morphine or heroin in the body after high doses. The drug is easily abused due to its low cost, ease of accessibility, legal status, and lack of social stigma associated with its possession. Most importantly, loperamide is a cardiac toxin that causes conduction disturbances in high doses and can produce deadly dysrhythmias.






Dr. LaRochelle[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Marc R. Larochelle, MD, MPH
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Boston Medical Center
Boston, MA
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Larochelle: More than 16 thousand people in the United States die from prescription opioid overdose each year. However, morbidity extends well beyond fatal overdose - nearly half a million emergency department visits each year are related to prescription opioid-related harms. Emergency department visits for misuse of opioids represent an opportunity to identify and intervene on opioid use disorders, particularly for patients who receive prescriptions for opioids to treat pain. We examined a cohort of nearly 3000 commercially insured individuals prescribed opioids for chronic pain who were treated for a nonfatal opioid overdose in an emergency department or inpatient setting. We were interested in examining rates of continued prescribing after the overdose and the association of that prescribing with risk of repeated overdose. We found that 91% of individuals received another prescription for opioids after the overdose. Those continuing to receive
Dr. Leclercq[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Florence Leclercq, MD, PhD
Department of Cardiology
Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital
University hospital of Montpellier
Montpellier,France
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Patients with history of coronary artery disease (CAD) are considered as a population with high risk of further coronary events. However, frequent pre-existing ECG changes observed in these patients result in difficulty interpreting new ECG aspects in case of chest discomfort. Furthermore, anxiety frequently induced non-cardiac causes of chest pain in these patients, leading to unjustified admission to cardiology units. Moreover, levels of troponin are usually higher in patients with previous CAD compared to patients without history of angina, resulting in difficulty interpreting baseline values in this population. Conversely, copeptin may be influenced by the severity of myocardial ischemia and resulting endogenous stress, and could be a useful additional marker to exclude severe coronary stenosis in high-risk patients with recent chest pain.
This propective monocentric study evaluates the incremental value of copeptin associated with high-sensitivity cardiac T troponin (hs-cTnT) to exclude severe coronary stenosis in 96 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and acute chest pain.
Mean age of patients was 60 +/- 13.8 years and the mean time between chest pain onset and blood samples of copeptin was 4.2 +/-2.7 hours. According to clinical decision, coronary angiography was performed in 71 patients (73.9 %) and severe stenosis diagnosed in 14 of them (14.6%). No ischemia was detected on SPECT imaging (n=25). Among the 69 patients with a negative kinetic of hs-cTnT and a negative baseline copeptin, 5 (7.4%) had a severe stenosis (NPV 0.93; 95% CI: 0.87-0.99), 4 of them related to in-stent restenosis (NPV for exclusion of native coronary stenosis: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.93-1).
We can conclude that in patients with preexisting CAD, and once Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) is excluded, copeptin increases the NPV of
Dr. April[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Michael D. April, MD, DPhil
Department of Emergency Medicine
San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium
San Antonio, TX
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. April: Anesthesia research studies have found that nasal inhalation of isopropyl
alcohol has efficacy in treating nausea among post-operative patients. We
sought to study this agent among Emergency Department patients with nausea or
vomiting. We found that patients randomized to inhale isopropyl alcohol had
improved self-reported nausea scores compared to patients randomized to inhale
saline (placebo).
Dr. Ken Uchino[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Ken Uchino, MD FAHA FANA
Director, Vascular Neurology Fellowship
Research Director, Cerebrovascular Center, Cleveland Clinic
Associate Professor of Medicine (Neurology)
Cleveland Clinic
Lerner College of Medicine of CWRU
Cleveland, OH 44195
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Uchino: Treatment for acute ischemic stroke is time dependent. Multiple studies have reported strategies to improve time to treatment after arrival in the hospital. Mimicking pre-hospital thrombolysis of acute myocardial infarction pioneered 30 years ago, two groups in Germany have implemented pre-hospital ischemic stroke thrombolysis using mobile stroke unit (“stroke ambulance”) that includes CT scan and laboratory capabilities. These units have been demonstrated to provide stroke treatment earlier than bringing patients to the emergency departments.
Our report extends the concept mobile stroke unit further by using telemedicine for remote physician presence. The other mobile stroke units were designed to have at least one physician on board. This allows potential multiple or geographically distant units to be supported by stroke specialists.
The study demonstrates that after patient arrival in the ambulance, the time to evaluation (CT scanning and blood testing) and to thrombolytic treatment is as quick or better as patient arrival in emergency department door. We are reporting the overall time efficiency after emergency medical service notification (911 call) in a separate paper.
Dr. McNaughton[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Candace D. McNaughton, MD MPH FACEP
Assistant Professor
Emergency Medicine Research
Department of Emergency Medicine, Research Division
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. McNaughton: Hypertension, or high blood pressure, affects 1/3rd of adults in the United States and more than 1 billion people worldwide. It is also the #1 risk factor for cardiovascular disease such as heart attack and stroke, so it is very important to treat.
The burden of hypertension in the emergency department is not well understood. The ER is not usually thought of as a place where perhaps we could or should be addressing hypertension; that has traditionally be left up to primary care providers. Through this study, our goals were to gain a better understanding of how many ER visits were either related to hypertension or were solely because of hypertension, and to determine whether this changed from 2006 to 2012.
We found that