Author Interviews, Gender Differences, Lancet, OBGYNE, Surgical Research / 21.12.2016
Study Finds No Clear Benefit of Mesh For Prolapse Surgery
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
[caption id="attachment_30694" align="alignleft" width="140"]
Prof. Cathryn Glazener[/caption]
Prof. Cathryn Glazener PhD
Health Services Research Unit
University of Aberdeen
Aberdeen,UK
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Prolapse is a condition that affects up to half of all women after childbirth. Women notice a bulge or discomfort in their vaginas due to pressure from the bladder, bowel or womb moving downwards. Women who have surgery for their prolapse have a 3 in 10 chance of needing at least one more operation, so the success rate is not great. Gynaecologists hoped that by reinforcing their repairs the success rate would get better.
PROSPECT was a pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial conducted in 35 centres across the UK. Women undergoing their first operation for prolapse were randomised to having a standard repair of the front or back wall of the vagina, or a repair reinforced by synthetic non-absorbable mesh, or a biological graft.
We found that, in contrast to previous research, women were just as likely to be cured after standard surgery rather than reinforced repairs. They were just as likely to have other symptoms such as bladder or sexual problems, and other adverse effects such as infection, bleeding or pain.
However, about 1 in 10 of the women who had mesh did have mesh exposure when a small portion of the mesh becomes visible through the vaginal wall. Although many women did not have symptoms, about half of those women needed a small operation to remove or bury the exposed mesh.
Prof. Cathryn Glazener[/caption]
Prof. Cathryn Glazener PhD
Health Services Research Unit
University of Aberdeen
Aberdeen,UK
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Prolapse is a condition that affects up to half of all women after childbirth. Women notice a bulge or discomfort in their vaginas due to pressure from the bladder, bowel or womb moving downwards. Women who have surgery for their prolapse have a 3 in 10 chance of needing at least one more operation, so the success rate is not great. Gynaecologists hoped that by reinforcing their repairs the success rate would get better.
PROSPECT was a pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial conducted in 35 centres across the UK. Women undergoing their first operation for prolapse were randomised to having a standard repair of the front or back wall of the vagina, or a repair reinforced by synthetic non-absorbable mesh, or a biological graft.
We found that, in contrast to previous research, women were just as likely to be cured after standard surgery rather than reinforced repairs. They were just as likely to have other symptoms such as bladder or sexual problems, and other adverse effects such as infection, bleeding or pain.
However, about 1 in 10 of the women who had mesh did have mesh exposure when a small portion of the mesh becomes visible through the vaginal wall. Although many women did not have symptoms, about half of those women needed a small operation to remove or bury the exposed mesh.
Dr. Kathleen Fischer[/caption]
Kathleen Fischer, PhD
Department of Biology
UAB | University of Alabama Birmingham
Birmingham, AL
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Fischer: Aging is by far the greatest risk factor for most of the chronic, non-communicable diseases (e.g. cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes). By discovering the basic mechanisms responsible for aging we can find ways to extend healthy and productive life and reduce the burdens of chronic disease and disability experienced by individuals and society. Sex differences in longevity can provide novel insights into the basic biology of aging; however this aspect of aging has been largely ignored.
Demographic data show that women outlive men in every society during every historical period and in every geographic area. In spite of this robust survival advantage, women suffer far greater morbidity late in life—a phenomenon described as the morbidity-mortality paradox. It is not clear whether this is a general mammalian pattern or something unique to humans. Research on sex differences in aging and age-related diseases in humans and a range of species will be crucial if we are going to identify the basic mechanisms responsible for the patterns we observe.
Dr. Sara Brownell[/caption]
Sara E. Brownell PhD
School of Life Sciences
Arizona State University
Tempe, AZ
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Brownell: Our group has been broadly interested in gender biases in introductory biology
since we published a study that showed that women underperform on course
exams and under participate in whole class discussions compared to men
(http://www.lifescied.org/content/13/3/478.full). We were curious why women
might be under performing on these course exams so in this new study, we
examined characteristics of the exams to see if that had an impact. What we
found was that women and men perform equally on questions that test basic
memorization. However, when questions tested more higher-level critical
thinking skills, women were not scoring as high as men. This happened even
when we took into account the academic ability of the students - women and men
who had the same ability coming into the class. We also found that students
from lower socioeconomic statuses also underperformed on these higher-level
critical thinking questions compared to students from higher socioeconomic
statuses, again even when we took into account academic ability.
Dr. Alexander Turchin[/caption]
Alexander Turchin, MD, MS
Associate Physician, Brigham and Women's Hospital
Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Department of Medicine
Endocrinology
Boston, MA 02115
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Turchin: It is known that fewer women than men at high risk for cardiovascular disease are treated with statins.
However, the reasons for this sex disparity are not fully understood.
Our study identified 4 factors that accounted for over 90% of the difference in statin therapy between women and men with coronary artery disease:
Dr. Alison Fecher[/caption]
Alison M. Fecher, MD
Assistant Professor of Surgery
Indiana University Health
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Fecher: It has long been known that female faculty are underrepresented in departments of surgery at U.S. medical schools. Our study wanted to identify obstacles women face in entering certain surgical subspecialties and in career advancement. We found that women are poorly represented in some of the most competitive subspecialties, including cardiothoracic and transplant surgery. We also found that women tend to advance more slowly up the career ladder, with many of them spending more years at the assistant professor level than their male counterparts. One reason for this may be that they tend to publish less peer-reviewed articles than male faculty; however, our results show that the publications of female faculty often has a greater impact on the field, as measured by citations and recentness of articles.
Dr. Judith Lechner[/caption]
A.Univ.-Prof. Dr. Judith Lechner
Div. Physiology
Medical University of Innsbruck
Innsbruck Austria
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Lechner: Women are not just small men. Sex differences affect most, if not all the organ systems in the body. Over the past decades biomedical researchers have been mainly using male models. Therefore, there is a significant gap in knowledge of female physiology except for organ functions involved in reproduction. While the necessity to fill in these gaps has been advocated, our understanding of sex and gender differences in human physiology and pathophysiology is still limited. This holds especially true for the kidneys, e.g. while international registries show that fewer women than men are in need of renal replacement therapy due to end stage renal disease, the potentially underlying causes are still not known.
The aim of our study was to find out, if hormone changes due to the female menstrual cycle would affect normal renal cells. For this purpose, urinary samples of healthy women of reproductive age were collected daily and analyzed for menstrual cycle-associated changes of marker proteins. Specifically, two enzymes (Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase, Glutathione-S-transferase alpha) were measured, which are intracellular components of proximal tubular cells, a key population of renal cells. Upon cell damage, these enzymes are released into the urine, qualifying them as clinical markers for early detection of tubular injury. Since even in healthy persons low amounts of these enzymes can be detected in the urine, we used these marker proteins to analyze potential effects of the female hormone cycle on normal functioning of this cell population. As a result, we could detect transient increases of Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase and Glutathione-S-transferase alpha correlating with specific phases of the female hormone cycle, namely ovulation and menses.
This finding suggests that cyclical changes of female hormones might affect renal cell homeostasis, potentially providing women with an increased resistance against kidney damages. Thus, recurring changes of sex hormone levels, as during the natural menstrual cycle, might be involved in periodic tissue re-modeling not only in reproductive organs, but to a certain extent in the kidneys as well.
Dr. Sherry Grace[/caption]
Sherry L. Grace, PhD
Professor, School of Kinesiology and Health Science
York University
Sr. Scientist, Cardiorespiratory Fitness Team
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network
Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, ON
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Grace: Cardiac rehabilitation is an outpatient chronic disease management program. It is a standardized model of care, comprised of risk factor assessment and management, exercise training, patient education, as well and dietary and psychosocial counseling. Patients generally attend two times a week for several months.
Participation in cardiac rehab has been shown to reduce death and disability. This is a dose-response association, such that more cardiac rehab participation is associated with even less death, etc. Therefore, it is important that patients adhere to the program, or participate in all the prescribed sessions.
No one has ever reviewed patient adherence to cardiac rehab in a systematic way. It has always been assumed that patients only attend about half of prescribed sessions. Also, many studies have shown that women attend fewer sessions than men. However, this has been known for some time, so we would hope that in the current era, this sex difference would not exist. No study has ever aggregated and analyzed sex differences in program adherence, so we set out to do this.