Allergies, Asthma, Author Interviews, JAMA, Pediatrics, Pulmonary Disease / 09.02.2016
Wheezing in Early Childhood Linked to Reduced Lung Function By Adolescence
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
[caption id="attachment_21421" align="alignleft" width="180"]
Dr. Meghan Azad[/caption]
Dr. Meghan B. Azad PhD
Assistant Professor Department of Pediatrics & Child Health and Community Health Sciences University of Manitoba and
Children’s Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
Associate Investigator, Canadian Healthy Infant Longitudinal Development (CHILD) Study
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Azad: Asthma is the most common reason for children to miss school or be admitted to hospital, and accounts for over 30% of Canadian healthcare billings for children. Although many treatments exist to manage asthma symptoms, it is a lifelong disease and there is no cure. Prevention is the best approach to reduce the global burden of asthma, and our study provides important new information to inform asthma prevention strategies.
Medical Research: What are the main findings?
Dr. Azad: Wheezing is common in babies and young children. Our study looked at the long-term implications of wheezing in early life, using data from the Canadian Asthma Primary Prevention Study (CAPPS).
We followed 320 children from Winnipeg and Vancouver from before birth until adolescence, and found that specific patterns of early wheezing (from age 0 to 7) were associated with decreased lung function and increased risk for asthma by age 15.
By age 15, children who wheezed consistently through infancy and early childhood had the worst lung function (9% lower compared to non-wheezers) and the highest asthma risk (11 times higher). Even children with “transient early wheeze” (those who wheezed as babies but not as young children) had reduced lung function (5% lower) and increased asthma risk (4 times higher) as teenagers.
Dr. Meghan Azad[/caption]
Dr. Meghan B. Azad PhD
Assistant Professor Department of Pediatrics & Child Health and Community Health Sciences University of Manitoba and
Children’s Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
Associate Investigator, Canadian Healthy Infant Longitudinal Development (CHILD) Study
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Azad: Asthma is the most common reason for children to miss school or be admitted to hospital, and accounts for over 30% of Canadian healthcare billings for children. Although many treatments exist to manage asthma symptoms, it is a lifelong disease and there is no cure. Prevention is the best approach to reduce the global burden of asthma, and our study provides important new information to inform asthma prevention strategies.
Medical Research: What are the main findings?
Dr. Azad: Wheezing is common in babies and young children. Our study looked at the long-term implications of wheezing in early life, using data from the Canadian Asthma Primary Prevention Study (CAPPS).
We followed 320 children from Winnipeg and Vancouver from before birth until adolescence, and found that specific patterns of early wheezing (from age 0 to 7) were associated with decreased lung function and increased risk for asthma by age 15.
By age 15, children who wheezed consistently through infancy and early childhood had the worst lung function (9% lower compared to non-wheezers) and the highest asthma risk (11 times higher). Even children with “transient early wheeze” (those who wheezed as babies but not as young children) had reduced lung function (5% lower) and increased asthma risk (4 times higher) as teenagers.
Dr. Cassie Kennedy[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Cassie Kennedy, M.D.
Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine
Mayo Clinic
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Kennedy: Lung transplant is a surgical procedure that can offer extended life expectancy and improved quality of life to selected patients with end-stage lung disease. However there are about 1700 patients awaiting lung transplant at any given time in the United States because transplant recipients far exceed potential donors. In addition, even with carefully chosen candidates, lung transplant recipients live on average about 5.5 years. It is therefore very important for transplant physicians to choose patients who will receive the most benefit from their lung transplant.
Frailty (defined as an increased vulnerability to adverse health outcomes) has typically been a subjective consideration by transplant physicians when choosing lung transplant candidates. The emergence of more objective and reproducible frailty measures from the geriatric literature present an opportunity to study the prevalence of frailty in lung transplant (despite that subjective screening) and to determine whether the presence of frailty has any impact on patient outcomes.
Medical Research: What are the main findings?
Dr. Kennedy: Frailty is quite common --46 percent of our patient cohort was frail by the Frailty Deficit Index. We also saw a significant association between frailty and worsened survival following lung transplantation: one-year survival rate for frail patients was 71.7 percent, compared to 92.9 percent for patients who were not frail. At three years this difference in survival persisted--the survival rate for frail patients was 41.3 percent, compared to 66.1 percent for patients who were not frail.
Imre Noth, M.D.[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Imre Noth, M.D.
Professor of Medicine and Director of the Interstitial Lung Disease Programme
The University of Chicago
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Noth: In 2014, OFEV® (nintedanib) became one of the first FDA-approved drug treatments for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a rare and serious lung disease that causes permanent scarring of the lungs. In this post-marketing surveillance study in the United States, treatment with OFEV in the real-world clinical setting showed a safety profile consistent with that observed in clinical trials supporting its approval by the FDA.
Post-marketing surveillance of the safety and tolerability of OFEV in the United States has been collected in the Boehringer Ingelheim drug safety and reporting database since OFEV was first approved on October 15, 2014. Until May 31, 2015, 3,838 people were treated with OFEV for a length of time ranging from 14 to 265 days (on average 88 days). The most frequently reported side effects were gastrointestinal in nature and included diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and decreased appetite. Diarrhea was the most frequently reported individual side effect, occurring at a similar frequency to that observed in the clinical trials supporting approval. No new safety concerns were identified.


















