Author Interviews, Cancer Research, JAMA / 11.03.2016
Negative Trials Have As Much Scientific Impact As Positive Studies
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
[caption id="attachment_22567" align="alignleft" width="133"]
Dr. Joseph Unger[/caption]
Joseph Unger, PhD, MS
SWOG Statistical Center
Assistant Member, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Affiliate Assistant Professor, Health Services Research, University of Washington
Seattle, WA 98109-1024
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Unger: The rate at which trials are positive has previously been examined, and the relationship between trial results and publication rates in the context of publication bias has also been studied. But the comparative scientific impact of positive vs negative clinical trials using citation data has not been investigated
We used the phase III trial database of SWOG, a major national cooperative clinical trials group, in combination with its trial publication database and citation data from Google Scholar, to compare the scientific impact of positive vs negative phase III cancer clinical treatment trials.
Dr. Joseph Unger[/caption]
Joseph Unger, PhD, MS
SWOG Statistical Center
Assistant Member, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Affiliate Assistant Professor, Health Services Research, University of Washington
Seattle, WA 98109-1024
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Unger: The rate at which trials are positive has previously been examined, and the relationship between trial results and publication rates in the context of publication bias has also been studied. But the comparative scientific impact of positive vs negative clinical trials using citation data has not been investigated
We used the phase III trial database of SWOG, a major national cooperative clinical trials group, in combination with its trial publication database and citation data from Google Scholar, to compare the scientific impact of positive vs negative phase III cancer clinical treatment trials.























Dr. Chirag Patil[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Chirag Patil, MD
American Board Certified Neurosurgeon
Brain & Spine Tumor Program
Lead Investigator, Precision Medicine Initiative Against Brain Cancer
Program Director, Neurosurgical Residence training program
Director, Center for Neurosurgical Outcomes Research Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
MedicalResearch.com Editor’s note: Dr. Patil’s research is focused on developing a method of personalized cancer treatment through the harnessing of genome wide mutational analysis of a specific patient’s cancer.
MedicalResearch.com: Would you tell us a little about yourself and your research interests?
Dr. Patil: I am a Stanford-trained, Board Certified Neurosurgeon and cancer researcher at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, California. I primarily focus on the care of patients with malignant brain tumors, particularly glioblastomas. I received my undergraduate degree from Cornell, followed by a medical degree from the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), where I was a Regent’s scholar. I completed a residency in neurosurgery and a fellowship in stereotactic radiology at Stanford University. I also have a master’s degree in epidemiology with a focus on clinical trial design and mathematical modeling from Stanford.
MedicalResearch.com: Can you tell us about some of your research interests?
Dr. Patil: I am keenly interested in and focused on developing precision science-powered novel brain tumor therapies, immuno-therapies, and patient-centered “big data” outcomes research. I lead the recently-funded Cedars-Sinai Precision Medicine Initiative Against Brain Cancer, which utilizes tumor genomics to build a mathematical computer model, i.e., a virtual cancer cell of each patient’s unique tumor. The White House and several other stakeholders have taken keep interest in this research initiative as an example of a leading precision medicine program.
Dr. Ilir Agalliu[/caption]
Dr. Murchison[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr. Elizabeth Murchison
Menzies Institute for Medical Research
University of Tasmania
Save the Tasmanian Devil Program
Tasmanian Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and the Environment
Hobart Australia
Department of Veterinary Medicine
University of Cambridge, Cambridge UK
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Murchison: Transmissible cancers are cancers that can be transmitted between individuals by the transfer of living cancer cells. Transmissible cancers emerge only very rarely in nature, and until now only three examples were known. One of the three known naturally occurring transmissible cancers affects Tasmanian devils, the world’s largest carnivorous marsupial. This disease, which causes disfiguring facial tumours, was first observed in the late 1990s, and since then the disease has spread widely through the Tasmanian devil population. This transmissible cancer first emerged as a cancer in a single individual Tasmanian devil that probably lived about 30 years ago; this devil’s cancer cells have continued to survive by transmitting between hosts by biting.
Medical Research: What are the main findings?
Dr. Murchison: In late 2014, routine monitoring of the Tasmanian devil population led to the discovery of a male devil with facial tumours that resembled the known Tasmanian devil transmissible facial cancer. However, genetic analysis of this tumour indicated that the tumour in this devil was derived from a second transmissible cancer that was genetically unrelated to the first transmissible cancer in this species. Indeed, the genetic profile of this second cancer indicated that it had originally emerged from a male animal. This second cancer has subsequently been found in nine additional devils in the same part of Tasmania.
Dr. Erin Hahn[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Erin E. Hahn, PhD, MPH
Research Scientist
Southern California Permanente Medical Group
Kaiser Permanente Research
Department of Research & Evaluation
Pasadena, CA 91101
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Hahn: Adolescent and young adults, or AYAs, who are diagnosed and treated for Hodgkin lymphoma have very high overall survival rates. However, these patients are at high risk for short and long term health issues related to their cancer treatment, including cancer recurrence, cardiac and pulmonary problems, and developing new primary cancers. Some of these issues arise during treatment and persist over time, called long-term effects, and some develop years later, called late effects.
Evidence and consensus based guidelines are available from organizations like the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the Children’s Oncology Group to help manage the post treatment care of Adolescent and young adults Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. Examining adherence to guidelines is an important part of high quality care, and can help us find and address gaps in care.
Guideline recommended care for these patients includes: oncology visits, imaging and labs, preventive care, counseling and education, risk based screening for late effects. Risk-based screening is based on a patient’s treatment. The type of health screening a patient needs is determined by the treatment exposure they had, such as certain types of chemotherapy or high-dose radiation that have known late effects
Medical Research: What are the main findings?
Dr. Hahn: For this pilot study, I was interested to see if post-treatment Adolescent and young adults
Dr. Elena Batrakova[/caption]
Dr. Sergio Acuna[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Sergio A. Acuna, MD
Graduate Student at St. Michael's Hospital and IHPME
University of Toronto
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Acuna: Solid organ transplant recipients are known to be at greater risk of developing cancers compared to the general population; however, because they are also at high increased risk of mortality from non-cancer causes, the risk of cancer morality in this population is unclear. As previous studies on this topic have reported disparate findings, the cancer mortality risk in this population remained uncertain.
Medical Research: What are the main findings?
Dr. Acuna: Our study provides conclusive evidence that solid organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of cancer mortality. Our findings demonstrate that solid organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of cancer death compared to the general population regardless of age, transplanted organ, and year of transplantation, and indicate cancer is a substantial cause of death in this population.
Dr. Daniel Mulrooney[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Daniel A. Mulrooney, MD, MS
Cancer Survivorship
Jude Children's Research Hospital
TN 38105-3678
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Mulrooney: This is a cross-sectional analysis performed in the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study (SJLIFE), an ongoing study designed to facilitate longitudinal evaluation of health outcomes among adults previously treated for childhood cancer. Following patients over the life spectrum can be challenging making it difficult to understand the long-term health effects of childhood cancer therapy. Previous studies have relied on self-report, registry, or death certificate data. Our study is novel because we clinically evaluated cancer survivors on the St. Jude campus and identified substantial, asymptomatic cardiac disease (cardiomyopathy, coronary artery disease, valvular disease, and conduction/rhythm disorders).