Dr. Paul L. Morgan[/caption]
Paul L. Morgan, Ph.D.
Associate Professor, Department of Education Policy Studies
Director, Educational Risk Initiative
Faculty Affiliate, Child Study Center
Research Associate, Population Research Institute
Faculty Affiliate, Prevention Research Center
The Pennsylvania State University
University Park, PA
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Morgan: The U.S. is at of risk declining economic competitiveness due to its lower levels of educational attainment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) relative to other countries (see http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12999/rising-above-the-gathering-storm-revisited-rapidly-approaching-category-5). Concurrently, the U.S. has a well-established “leaky STEM pipeline” in which children who are racial or ethnic minorities, females, or from low income families are especially unlikely to grow up to be employed in STEM positions. Large science achievement gaps are disproportionately experienced by these same groups of children. Yet the U.S. is increasingly transitioning to a knowledge economy necessitating higher levels of scientific thinking, problem solving, and technical competency.
The causes of these science achievement gaps have been poorly understood. Most of the existing empirical work on science achievement gaps has used cross-sectional designs. The samples also have largely been of older students attending middle or high schools. As a result, the early onset, over-time dynamics, and risk factors for science achievement gaps have been largely unknown. Our study helps inform policy, research, and practice by establishing that science achievement gaps emerge by the elementary grades and then largely remain stable as children continue throughout middle school. These gaps are mostly explained by children’s knowledge about their general surroundings acquired by the primary grades. Children’s reading and mathematics achievement also help to explain their science achievement, as do income inequality and school racial and income segregation. We find that children from traditionally marginalized groups (e.g., those who are Black, Hispanic, or from low-income families) are especially likely to enter school with general knowledge gaps. These same children often continue to experience science achievement gaps throughout elementary and middle school. However, factors modifiable by parents, educators, and policymakers largely explain these children’s gaps and so might be the target of early and sustained intervention efforts.
Dr. Katherine Musliner[/caption]
Katherine L. Musliner, PhD
National Centre for Register-Based Research, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
The Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research
Department of Mental Health
The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: There is great variation among patients with depression in terms of long-term illness course. This variation may be indicative of underlying differences in the cause of the illness, and from a practical perspective, it also has implications for treatment and allocation of public health resources. Our goal was to identify different trajectories of depression course by examining inpatient and outpatient contacts for depression at psychiatric treatment facilities in Denmark (where healthcare is free) during the 10-year period following patients’ initial depression diagnosis.
We found that the majority of patients (77% in our sample) followed a trajectory characterized by a brief period of contact with the psychiatric treatment system and no contact for depression during the remainder of the 10-year follow up period. Patients with more prolonged contact either had a drawn out initial period of contact lasting as long as five years (13%), left depression treatment for several years only to return with a depression diagnosis years later (7%) or exhibited a chronic course (3%).
Dr. Massimo Cristofanilli[/caption]
Massimo Cristofanilli, MD, FACP
Professor of Medicine
Associate Director of Translational Research and Precision Medicine
Department of Medicine-Hematology and Oncology
Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center
Feinberg School of Medicine
Chicago, IL 60611
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Cristofanilli: The majority of breast cancer are estrogen-receptor positive and therefore candidate for treatment with endocrine therapy in the adjuvant and advanced settings. The most significant issue in the management of estrogen-receptor positive metastatic breast cancer is the development of drug resistance. Very few effective options are available for patients that demonstrate progression of disease while on standard endocrine therapy, particularly in premenopausal women and/or women that have even progressed on chemotherapy. The study demonstrated that the combination of fulvestrant with palbociclib, a novel inhibitor of CDK4/6 kinases, significantly improve response to treatment and delays disease progression with minimal toxicity.
Dr. Richard Iorio[/caption]
Richard Iorio, MD
Dr. William and Susan Jaffe Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery
Chief of the Division of Adult Reconstructive Surgery
NYU Langone Medical Center
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Iorio: NYU Langone Medical Center’s Department of Orthopaedic Surgery realized early that alternate payment strategies based on value rather than volume were going to be increasing in prevalence and represent the future of compensation strategies As leaders in orthopaedics, we knew that we must embrace this change and develop strategies and effective protocols to successfully navigate this alternative payment universe.
In 2011, NYU Langone’s Hospital for Joint Diseases was chosen as a pilot site for CMS’s Bundled Payment Care Initiative, focusing on Medicare patients undergoing a total joint replacement. Beginning in 2013, we implemented protocols developed at our hospital focusing on preoperatiive patient selection criteria in an effort to ensure better outcomes for Medicare patients who underwent total joint replacements. Under a bundled payment program, hospitals assume financial responsibility for any complications over the entire episode of care 90 days after surgery, including postsurgical infections and hospital readmissions.
We compared year over year outcomes from year 1 to year 3 of this program, and found:
Dr. Richard Dunbar[/caption]
Dr. Richard L. Dunbar MD MS
Assistant Professor of Medicine, Attending Physician, Preventive Cardiovascular Medicine Clinic, Member, Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania School of MedicineMember, Institute for Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism,
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and
[caption id="attachment_22306" align="alignleft" width="90"]
Dr. Harsh Goel[/caption]
Dr. Harsh Goel
WellSpan Academic Hospitalists
Department of Medicine, York Hospital, PA
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this analysis?
Response: Niacin is the first cholesterol lowering treatment to prevent heart attacks and lower long term mortality. It thus provided the first proof that lowering cholesterol reduces cardiovascular risk. However, it is generally poorly tolerated due to almost universal flushing, limiting use. The better-tolerated statin drugs overshadowed niacin, rightly dominating hyperlipidemia therapy. Despite their advantages, statins are far from perfect, leaving important gaps. Firstly, at least 10% of patients simply don’t tolerate statins. Secondly, about 40% of patients have insufficient cholesterol lowering, leaving them far from their target LDL-cholesterol levels. Finally, even though statins lower cardiovascular risk, they by no means eliminate it and significant residual risk remains even in patients who respond to them.
The relatively poor tolerance of niacin motivated development of an extended-release alternative which was dosed very differently from the established cardioprotective regimen used in the Coronary Drug Project (CDP) and the Stockholm Ischemic Heart Disease Study (SIHDS), the two landmark trials that proved niacin's benefits. These trailblazing trials used 3 grams of niacin divided throughout the fed portion of the day as 1 gram thrice daily with meals. In sharp contrast, the alternative regimen was severely handicapped by a profoundly lower dose of only 2 grams per day. Perhaps worse, the alternative regimen dosed all of the niacin at one sitting, at bedtime before the overnight fast, rather than three times a day before meals. We believe these were critical departures from the established cardioprotective niacin regimen, insofar as they severely undermined the alternative regimen’s efficacy. Accordingly, when added to statins, the alternative regimen failed to recapitulate the benefits seen with the established cardioprotective regimen in two recent large clinical trials, the AIM-HIGH trial and the HPS2-THRIVE trial. Besides the inherent flaws of the alternative regimen, there were also major issues with the trial designs which likely contributed to null results.
From a practice standpoint, this is worrisome, because clinicians may draw erroneous conclusions from the trials of the alternative regimen, and thereby deny a significant population of hyperlipidemic patients the benefits of a well-proven cardioprotective therapy, i.e. the population which does not tolerate or does not respond adequately to statins (almost 50% of at risk patients). Hence, we embarked on a critical analysis and review of the alternative regimen with a special focus on the AIM-HIGH and HPS2-THRIVE trials to bring to light the pitfalls of comparing radically different regimens of what is nominally the same drug.
Dr. Albert Siu[/caption]
Dr. Albert Siu M.D., M.S.P.H.
Chair of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Chairman and professor of the Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Director of the Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center
James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Siu: Impaired vision is a serious and common problem facing older adults and can affect their independence, ability to function, and quality of life. When the Task Force reviewed the research around screening older adults for vision impairment in a primary care setting, we concluded that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms. As a result, we issued an I statement, which is consistent with the 2009 final and 2015 draft recommendations.
MedicalResearch.com: What should clinicians and patients take away from your report?
Dr. Siu: Older adults who are having problems seeing should talk to their primary care doctor or an eye specialist. Primary care doctors can explore the various causes of vision problems and do an eye exam to check for refractive error. An eye specialist can do a full eye exam to look for and treat refractive errors and other eye conditions that affect vision, such as cataracts and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). With regards to clinicians, in the absence of clear evidence, they should use their clinical judgment when deciding whether to screen patients who have not reported any concerns about their vision.
Dr. Oleg Gluz[/caption]
Oleg Gluz, MD
West German Study Group
Breast Center Niederrhein
Evangelical Hospital Bethesda
Moenchengladbach, Germany
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Gluz: PlanB trial is a Phase III chemotherapy study performed in patients with clinically high risk HER2 negative breast cancer. After early amendement, Recurrence Score (Oncotype Dx) as a selection criterion for or against chemotherapy together with central pathology review were included into the study. Patients with very low RS of below 12 and up to 3 positive lymph nodes were recommended to omit chemotherapy based on the low genomic recurrence risk. Chemotherapy was omitted in about 15% of all patients.
For the first time we present prospective data comparing a genomical tool (Oncotype Dx) and an independent central pathology review for grade, ER, PR, and Ki-67 from a large phase III study combined with an exploratory analysis on early relapse risk.
MedicalResearch.com: What are the main findings?
Dr. Gluz: The study has two major findings:
We have found a significant discordance in risk assessment between prognostic tools (grade by local and central lab, Oncotype Dx, Ki-67).
Patients treated by endocrine therapy alone based on very low Recurrence Score had an excellent disease free survival of 97% after 3 years of follow up.
Mr. Jim Joyce[/caption]
Mr. Jim Joyce
Chairman and CEO of Aethlon
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Mr. Joyce: Our research into the neurodegenerative disease Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE), was inspired by the death of Tom McHale, who was a former teammate and the second person diagnosed with CTE by our colleagues at the Boston University CTE Center. CTE is characterized by exposure to repetitive head trauma and at present, can only be diagnosed post-mortem, thus creating a significant need for a non-invasive method to diagnose and monitor CTE in living individuals.
The aim of our study was to examine exosomal tau levels in plasma as a potential CTE biomarker. Our research team originally discovered the presence of exosomal tau in circulation and then established methods to quantify exosomal tau, which we refer to as a TauSome™, which we believe to be the first potential blood test to detect CTE living individuals. For this study, researchers examined 78 former National Football League players and 17 former athletes of non-contact sports, with preliminary findings suggesting that exosomal tau in plasma may be a noninvasive, accurate biomarker for CTE.
The study results, published in the journal of Alzheimer’s disease, can be accessed here: http://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-alzheimers-disease/jad151028?resultNumber=7&totalResults=48&start=0&q=exosome&resultsPageSize=10&rows=10.
Dr. David Hodgson[/caption]
David Hodgson, MD, MPH, FRCPC
Associate Professor
University of Toronto
Toronto, ON Canada
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Hodgson: We know that treatment for childhood Hodgkin lymphoma can cause some side effects that arise years after treatment is finished. In particular, radiotherapy given to the chest of adolescent females increases the risk of developing breast cancer in young adult survivors. But there are very little data about whether the early initiation of breast cancer screening will prevent breast cancer deaths in these survivors, and what kinds of screening is optimal. This is important because less than half of these young survivors are undergoing breast cancer screening, and in some jurisdictions early screening is not covered by insurance.
MedicalResearch.com: What are the main findings?
Dr. Hodgson: Because there has not been, and likely never will be, a large randomized screening trial for these patients, we used all the available information about their breast cancer risk, other health issues and the effectiveness of screening, and created a mathematical model that allows us to estimate the number of breast cancer deaths prevented by starting screening at age 25 for women who had received chest RT as teenagers. We found that one would have to invite about 260 survivors to early mammographic screening to prevent one breast cancer death, which compares favorably to other accepted reasons for breast cancer screening. Using MRI for screening, approximately 80 women would have to be invited to prevent one breast cancer death, because MRI is so much more sensitive than mammography. One of the problems with MRI, however, is that a substantial number of women will have "false positive" tests - abnormal findings that are not really cancer.
Dr. Huizhi Wang[/caption]
Dr. Huizhi Wang
Assistant Professor
Department of Oral Immunology and Infectious Diseases
University of Louisville School of Dentistry
Louisville, KY
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Wang: Esophageal cancer is the eighth most frequent tumor and sixth leading cause of cancer death worldwide, characterized by rapid development and poor prognosis, including high mortality. Whereas the majority of cases occur in Asia, particularly in central China, recent data suggest that the frequency of new cases is rising in Western Europe and the USA. Mounting evidence suggests a causal relationship between specific bacterial infections and the development of certain malignancies. However, the possible role of the keystone periodontal pathogen, Porphyromonas gingivalis, in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) was unknown before our study. We found P. gingivalis infects epithelium of cancerous tissues up to 61%, as compared with 12% of adjacent tissues and non-infected in normal esophageal mucosa. A similar distribution of lysine-specific gingipain, a catalytic endoprotease uniquely secreted by P. gingivalis, and P. gingivalis DNA was observed. Moreover, we found infection of P. gingivalis was positively associated with the multiple clinicopathologic characteristics, including differentiation status, metastasis, and overall survival rate.
Dr. Dafna Mermon[/caption]
Dafna Merom, PhD
School of Science and Health
University of Western Sydney
Penrith New South Wales Australia
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Merom: It is well established that moderate-intensity physical activity can reduced the risk of having cardiovascular disease (CVD), yet we know very little about the CVD benefits that is associated with specific activity type. Considering that different types of physical activity challenge muscular-skeletal, neurological and cardio-respiratory systems differently, and that they involves different levels of psychosocial or cognitive demands, one may expect that different types of PA/sport may have differential relationships with health. Previous research found that frequent dancing protected against dementia, to a larger extent than walking. Since cardiovascular disease and dementia share similar risk factors we hypothesised that dancing will also protect against CVD, even more than walking given the multi-dimensional nature of dance; Dance integrate physical, cognitive, emotional and social elements in its execution.
We found that light-intensity dancing as well as light-intensity walking were not protective against cardiovascular disease mortality. However, dancers who were at least slightly out of breath or sweaty had 46% lower risk of Cardiovascular death. Compared to fast walkers, dancing further reduced the risk of dying from cardiovascular disease by 21%.”
Dr. Samuel Klein[/caption]
Samuel Klein, M.D.
William H. Danforth Professor of Medicine and Nutritional Science
Director, Center for Human Nutrition
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, MO 63110
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Klein: Most obesity treatment guidelines, including those recently proposed by several major medical and scientific societies, recommend moderate weight loss of 5%-10% to achieve improvements in metabolic function and health outcomes. However, it is much easier to achieve a 5% weight loss than it is to achieve a 10% weight loss, so it is important to understand the benefits that occur with a 5% weight loss and what additional benefits, if any, can be expected with more weight loss in people with obesity.
Dr. John Buse[/caption]
Dr. John Buse MD Ph.D
Professor, Medicine
Director, Diabetes Care Center
Chief, Division of Endocrinology
Executive Associate Dean, Clinical Research
University of North Carolina School of Medicine
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Buse: Degludec is an longer acting basal insulin analog recently approved in the US. Liraglutide is a once-daily GLP-1 receptor agonist. Both are among the most powerful glucose lowering drugs available in the setting of type 2 diabetes. They have very different properties. Degludec is best at lowering fasting glucose. Liraglutide has effects on postprandial glucose as well. The major side effects of degludec are hypoglycemia and weight gain. Liraglutide on the other hand has not an inherent effect to cause hypoglycemia and does promote weight loss. Liraglutide does cause nausea and in fewer patients vomiting in a dose dependent manner. In developing the fixed dose combination the idea was to amplify glucose lowering efficacy and minimize the adverse effects of both components. Prior studies have basically shown that this has been accomplished. In this study we looked at the very common clinical scenario of the patient with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulin glargine and asked the question of whether switching from glargine to IDegLira (the combination product) would do better than continued titration of glargine.
Bendix Carstensen[/caption]
Bendix Carstensen
Department of Clinical Epidemiology Steno Diabetes Center
Gentofte
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: It has long been known that all diabetes patients have elevated risk of cancer (10-15%). Patients on insulin slightly more (20-25%). Type 1 patients is only a small fraction (10%) of all diabetes patients, but they ALL take insulin. If insulin has a role in cancer occurrence it would be expected to be particularly pronounced in type 1 patients, and increasing by duration.
But it is not, the risk of cancer is 15% elevated (if we disregard prostate, breast and other cancers only occurring in one of the sexes), and there is no increase in the excess risk by duration of insulin use. Breast cancer risk is 10% lower and prostate cancer risk some 40% lower. Overall there is very little increased cancer risk - 1% for men 7% for women.
Dr. Behnood Bikdeli[/caption]
Behnood Bikdeli MD
Department of Internal Medicine and Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE)
Yale University School of Medicine
New Haven, CT 06510
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: The idea of closing the path of inferior vena cava (IVC) to prevent blood clots migrating to the pulmonary circulation and causing a pulmonary embolism (PE) has been around for over 150 years. We were aware than many practitioners might think of IVC filters for that reason, and specifically with the introduction of retrievable filters in recent years; that have made it more palatable for referring physicians.
However, there is a paucity of high-quality data to suggest the efficacy of IVC filters. The two existing large trials did not show a mortality benefit from use of filters, and the guidelines have very narrow indications for use of IVC filters in patients who have already had a pulmonary embolism.
Having said that, we wondered whether despite the absence of high-quality comparative effectiveness data, filters might be commonly used in patients with PE, particularly among older adults who are a vulnerable population (at higher risk of PE, at higher risk of PE complications; but also less likely to receive other advanced therapies for PE).
Our study common use of IVC filters among older adults in the US; with over 75% relative increase in use of IVC filters from 1999 to 2010 (from ~5000 patients with PE in 1999 to ~9000 patients with PE in 2010). We also noted wide regional variations in the use of IVC filters (e.g. highest in the South Atlantic and lowest in the Mountain region). Such differences fundamentally persisted over time. In addition, we noted declining short-term and 1-year mortality rates in patients with pulmonary embolism over time, irrespective of whether or not they received an IVC filter.
Adam Glassman[/caption]
Adam Glassman, M.S.
Director, DRCRnet Coordinating Center
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Tampa, FL 33647
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Diabetic macular edema (DME) involves a build-up of blood and fluid in the macula, the part of the eye needed for sharp, straight-ahead vision. Diabetic macular edema can occur in people with diabetic retinopathy and is the most common cause of diabetes-related vision loss. Anti-VEGF agents are the first line treatment for most U.S. retinal specialists to treat vision loss from DME. There are three commonly used agents to treat DME, EYLEA, Avastin, and Lucentis. Eylea and Lucentis are FDA approved for Diabetic macular edema treatment. However, Avastin is used off-label in repacked aliquots containing approximately 1/500th of the systemic dose used in cancer therapy. The costs of these agents vary substantially, with Eylea priced at $1,850 per injection, Lucentis at $1,170, and repackaged Avastin at $60. Results of this study, conducted by the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net) and funded by the NIH, found that all three agents are effective at improving vision and reducing DME over 2 years. When vision loss is relatively mild at baseline (20/32-20/40), all three agents are similarly effective at improving visual acuity. However, when vision loss at baseline is worse, Eylea outperforms Avastin at 2-years and also outperforms Lucentis at one year, but the difference between Eylea and Lucentis diminishes and is no longer statistically different at 2 years. The percentage of participants that experienced a systemic adverse events such as heart attack, stroke, or death from an unknown cause was greater with Lucentis (12%) versus Eylea (5%) and Avastin (8%). However, similar findings have not been seen in most previous studies.
Dr. Dingxiao Zhang[/caption]
Dr. Dingxiao Zhang Ph.D
Department of Epigenetics and Molecular Carcinogenesis
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Smithville, TX 78957, USA
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Zhang: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a heterogeneous malignancy harboring phenotypically and functionally diverse subpopulations of cancer cells. To better understand PCa cell heterogeneity, it is crucial to dissect the biology of normal prostate epithelial lineages. The background for the current study is to annotate the gene expression profiles of normal prostate epithelial cells, through which we hope to gain insight on Prostate cancer subtypes and the cellular heterogeneity in PCa. The prostate gland mainly contains basal and luminal cells constructed as a pseudostratified epithelium. Annotation of prostate epithelial transcriptomes provides a foundation for discoveries that can impact disease understanding and treatment. In this study, we have performed a genome-wide transcriptome analysis of human benign prostatic basal and luminal epithelial populations using deep RNA sequencing.
One of our major findings is that the differential gene expression profiles in basal versus luminal prostate epithelial cells account for their distinct functional properties. Specifically, basal cells preferentially express gene categories associated with stem cells, MYC-transcriptional program, neurogenesis, and ribosomal RNA (rRNA) biogenesis regulated by Pol I. Consistent with this profile, basal cells functionally exhibit intrinsic stem-like and neurogenic properties with enhanced rRNA transcription activity. Of clinical relevance, the basal cell gene expression profile is enriched in advanced, anaplastic, castration-resistant, and metastatic prostate cancers.
Therefore, we link the cell-type specific gene signatures to aggressive subtypes of prostate cancer and identify gene signatures associated with adverse clinical features.
Theresa Wimberley[/caption]
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Theresa Wimberley
PhD student
National Centre for Register-based Research
School of Business and Social Sciences
Aarhus University
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Approximately 30% of patients with schizophrenia suffer from treatment-resistant schizophrenia, i.e. they do not respond to first-line antipsychotic treatment. Identification of high-risk patients as early as possible is crucial in order to optimize treatment and improve prognosis. In a large population-based cohort of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia we found the following candidate predictors of treatment resistance:
Dr. Stephen Aichele[/caption]
Stephen Aichele PhD
University of Geneva in Switzerland
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Aichele: The study was initiated over 30 years ago by professor Patrick Rabbitt (U. Oxford), who sought to investigate age-related changes in health, lifestyle, and cognitive abilities in more than 6000 residents of Greater Manchester and Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK. Our most recent findings show that two psychological variables, lower self-rated health and age-related decrements in mental processing speed, appear to be especially important indicators of elevated mortality risk in middle-age and older adults.
Dr. Igho Ofotukun[/caption]
Dr. Igho Ofotokun MD MSc
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine
Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
Grady Healthcare System, Atlanta, Georgia
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Ofotokun: This work is focused on preventing further bone loss in HIV-infected patients and thus reducing the risk of future bone fractures. HIV infection is associated with a state of enhanced bone loss. HIV treatment with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) further worsens rather than improve bone loss. Almost all HAART regimens that have been examined have been associated with bone loss. The consequence of this skeletal assualt is markedly elevated fracture prevalence among individuals living with HIV across a wide age range.
It turns that the predominance of HAART associated bone loss occur within the first year of initiating therapy. In this study, we administered a single dose of 5 mg IV zoledronic acid, a long-acting bisphosphonate at the same time of HAART initiation to prevent HAART associated bone loss. At this dose, zoledronic acid prevented enhance bone resorption in all participants and completely blunted bone mineral density loss over the 48 weeks study follow up period.
Dr. J. William Harbour[/caption]
J. William Harbour, MD
Professor & Vice Chairman
Dr. Mark J. Daily Endowed Chair
Director, Ocular Oncology Service
Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
Interim Associated Director for Basic Research
Leader, Eye Cancer Site Disease Group
Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center
Member Interdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine
Biomedical Research Building, Room 824
Miami FL 33136
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Harbour: Gene expression profiling has become the predominant means of molecular prognostic testing in uveal melanoma, with primary tumors being divided into Class 1 (low metastatic risk, about two thirds of cases) and Class 2 (high metastatic risk, about one third of cases). In this study, we identified a new biomarker for uveal melanoma that subdivides Class 1 tumors based on the mRNA expression of the oncogene PRAME. Class 1 tumors not expressing PRAME have an extremely low metastatic risk, whereas those expressing PRAME have an intermediate metastatic risk.
Dr. Joanne Klevens[/caption]
Dr. Joanne Klevens, MD, PhD, MPH
Division of Violence Prevention
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Atlanta, Georgia
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Klevens: Pediatric abusive head trauma is a leading cause of fatal child maltreatment among young children and current prevention efforts have not been proven to be consistently effective. In this study, compared to seven states with no paid family leave policies, California’s policy showed significant decreases of hospital admissions for abusive head trauma in young children. This impact was observed despite low uptake of policy benefits by Californians, particularly among populations at highest risk of abusive head trauma.
Dr. Janet Sawicki[/caption]
Janet A. Sawicki, Ph.D.
Deputy Director and Professor
Lankenau Institute for Medical Research
100 Lancaster Ave.
Wynnewood, PA 19096
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Sawicki: This study addresses the need for a more effective therapy for ovarian cancer. HuR is an RNA-binding protein that is present in high amounts in ovarian tumor cells compared to amounts in normal cells. HuR regulates the expression of thousands of genes that promote the survival of tumor cells. Thus, it is an ideal therapeutic target to suppress ovarian tumor growth. In this study, we used a small interfering RNA (siRNA) to investigate the impact of suppressing HuR expression on ovarian tumor growth in an ovarian cancer mouse model. We made use of the ability to conjugate a novel DNA dendrimer nanocarrier, 3DNA®, to both siHuR and a tumor-targeting moiety to suppress HuR expression specifically in tumor cells following systemic administration while avoiding toxicity in healthy cells. Systemic administration of siHuR-conjugated FA-3DNA to ovarian tumor-bearing mice suppressed tumor growth and ascites development, and significantly prolonged lifespan. Gene expression analysis identified multiple HuR-regulated genes in tumor cells as evidenced by changes in their expression upon HuR inhibition. These HuR-regulated genes function in multiple essential cellular molecular pathways, a finding that sets this therapeutic approach apart from other therapies that target a single gene.
Dr. Alisa Khan[/caption]
Dr. Alisa Khan, MD MPH
Division of General Pediatrics
Boston Children’s Hospital
Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Khan: Medical errors, or mistakes in the process of caring for patients, occur frequently. While methods of detecting errors have improved, parents and families are not typically included in routine hospital safety monitoring systems. We found that nearly 1 in 11 parents reported their child had experienced a safety incident during hospitalization. Most of these reports were confirmed to be medical errors when reviewed by physicians, and many were not otherwise documented in the patient’s medical record.
Dr. Suzanne Schuh[/caption]
Suzanne Schuh, MD, FRCP(C), ABPEM
The Hospital for Sick Children affiliated with the
University of Toronto
Medical Research: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Schuh: Routine measurement of oxygen saturation in bronchiolitis is sometimes used as a proxy for illness severity, despite poor correlation between these parameters. This focus on oximetry may in part relate to lack of evidence on the natural history of desaturations in bronchiolitis which are often transient, and frequently not accompanied by increased respiratory distress. Desaturations occurring in infants with mild bronchiolitis in an ED often result in hospitalizations or prolonged hospital stay. They occur in healthy infants and may also occur in infants with mild bronchiolitis at home.
The main objective of this study of infants with acute bronchiolitis was to determine if there is a difference in the proportion of unscheduled medical visits within 72 hours of ED discharge in infants who desaturate during home oximetry monitoring versus those without desaturations. Our study shows that the majority of infants with mild bronchiolitis experience desaturations after discharge home.
Dr. Loes Jaspers[/caption]
Loes Jaspers MD, PhD scientist
Dept. of Epidemiology
Erasmus University Medical Center
Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Jaspers: In August 2015, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved flibanserin as a medical treatment for women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD). The approval was accompanied by considerable attention in the media. Some people were positive about the approval, while others questioned whether benefits outweigh the risks. That is why we systematically reviewed eight clinical trials (five published and three unpublished) that included 5,914 women to examine the efficacy and safety of the medication for treatment of hypoactive sexual desire disorder.
We found that women taking flibanserin experienced one-half additional satisfying sexual event per month, and that they experienced 2-4 times more side-effects, such as dizziness, sleepiness, nausea, and tiredness, compared to placebo. The overall improvement that women reported while taking the drug was low. It ranged from ‘minimal improvement’ to ‘no change’.
The quality of the evidence was graded using established and transparent guidelines, the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach (GRADE), which have been adopted by leading scientific organizations globally. Although the studies reviewed were randomized clinical trials, the quality of the evidence was very low, particularly because of limitations in design, the indirectness of evidence, and more favorable efficacy outcomes in published compared with unpublished studies.
Dr. Georgios Tsivgoulis[/caption]
Georgios Tsivgoulis , M.D., Ph.D., MSc, FESO
Assistant Professor of Neurology
University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Visiting Associate Professor of Neurology
Director of Stroke Research
Department of Neurology
University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Tsivgoulis: Literature data suggest that taking statins before an acute ischemic stroke may improve early outcomes including early neurological deterioration, mortality and disability in patients with acute ischemic stroke. However,the potential beneficial effect of statin pretreatment has never been investigated in acute ischemic stroke due to large artery atherosclerosis. The research question in this specific subgroup of ischemic stroke patients is of great importance, as large-artery atherosclerotic stroke carries the highest risk of early recurrent stroke in comparison to other acute ischemic stroke subtypes.
Using prospectively collected data from over 516 consecutive patients with acute large-artery atherosclerotic stroke from seven tertiary-care stroke centers during a three-year period we found that statin pretreatment in patients with acute large-artery atherosclerotic stroke is associated with better early outcomes in terms of neurological improvement, disability, survival and stroke recurrence.