MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Dr. Solveig Hofvind, Dr. Philos. Cancer Registry of Norway Majorstuen, Oslo MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? Response: To...
Stephen W. Duffy Professor of Cancer Screening Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry Queen Mary University of London
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings? Response: The phenomenon of length bias, whereby screening has more chance of detecting slow growing tumours, has been known about for some years. This has led some colleagues to speculate that breast cancer screening only benefits those with slow-growing, less aggressive cancers, and does not reduce deaths from more aggressive, rapidly progressing cancers. In this study, we addressed this question directly using data from a randomised trial of mammographic screening. We calculated the reduction in mortality from grade 1 (less aggressive), grade 2 (intermediate) and grade 3 (most aggressive) cancers, as a result of screening. We found that the greatest reduction in breast cancer mortality was from the aggressive, fast-growing grade 3 cancers, contrary to what had been suspected. (more…)MedicalResearch.com Interview with: Dr Christopher Michael Cook MBBS Bsc(Hons) MRCP MRC Clinical Research Fellow NHLI, Cardiovascular Medicine, Imperial College London MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this...
MedicalResearch.com Interview with: [caption id="attachment_32943" align="alignleft" width="180"] Dr. Boessen[/caption] Lars Boesen MD PhD Department of Urology Herlev Gentofte University Hospital Herlev MedicalResearch.com: What is the background...