10 Jun Hepatitis C Treatment: Study Finds No Liver, Kidney or Cardiovascular Adverse Effects
Posted at 12:08h
in Author Interviews, Hepatitis - Liver Disease, JAMA, Kaiser Permanente, Pharmacology
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
[caption id="attachment_49631" align="alignleft" width="200"]
Dr. McGlynn[/caption]
Elizabeth A. McGlynn, PhD
Vice President for Kaiser Permanente Research
Executive Director
Kaiser Permanente Center for Effectiveness and Safety
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: A report from the Institute for Safe Medication Practices based on FDA data and observations from a Kaiser Permanente physician leader raised questions about whether direct acting antiviral medications for the treatment of Hepatitis C posed any significant safety risks for patients. Since the decision to take medications requires making tradeoffs between benefits (which had been clearly established in clinical trials) and risks (which are often harder to ascertain until drugs are in widespread use in the real world) we decided this was an important question to pursue. We found no evidence of increased risks of significant side effects associated with taking these drugs. In this cohort study of 33,808 patients in three large health systems we found lower adjusted odds of experiencing the following adverse events: death, multiple organ failure, hepatic decompensation, acute-on-chronic liver event, and arrhythmia.



Dan Ly[/caption]
Dan Ly, MD, MPP
Ph.D. Program in Health Policy
Harvard
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: There is some mixed evidence regarding whether state level tort reform reduces defensive medicine, or the practicing of medicine in such a way to reduce medical liability. This includes “positive” defensive medicine, or performing certain tests and procedures to reduce such liability. Other research finds that the perception of malpractice risk drives such defensive medicine, including the use of diagnostic imaging, such as CT scans and MRIs.
I was interested in exploring what influenced the perception of this risk, hypothesizing that, for a physician, a report of an injury against one’s colleague might increase the perception of this risk and lead to an increase the use of diagnostic imaging.