Author Interviews, Brigham & Women's - Harvard, JAMA, Surgical Research / 27.10.2021
Most Military Surgeons Unprepared for Combat Care
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
[caption id="attachment_58312" align="alignleft" width="200"]
Dr. Weissman[/caption]
Joel S. Weissman, PhD
Deputy Director/Chief Scientific Officer
Center for Surgery and Public Health
Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School
Professor of Surgery (Health Policy)
Harvard Medical School
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Over time, the military health system has been shifting care for its soldiers and their families away from big military treatment facilities (MTFs), allowing soldiers and their families to get care from civilian hospitals. But this has had an unintended consequence. Unfortunately, it means that military surgeons are getting fewer cases, and they are worried about maintaining their skills as surgeons. But some surgeries count more than others to help prepare the surgeon for battlefield casualties.
Dr. Weissman[/caption]
Joel S. Weissman, PhD
Deputy Director/Chief Scientific Officer
Center for Surgery and Public Health
Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School
Professor of Surgery (Health Policy)
Harvard Medical School
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Over time, the military health system has been shifting care for its soldiers and their families away from big military treatment facilities (MTFs), allowing soldiers and their families to get care from civilian hospitals. But this has had an unintended consequence. Unfortunately, it means that military surgeons are getting fewer cases, and they are worried about maintaining their skills as surgeons. But some surgeries count more than others to help prepare the surgeon for battlefield casualties.
Dr. Conner[/caption]
Christopher Conner, MD, PhD
Neurosurgery resident
McGovern Medical School
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: There has been a growing understanding in medicine that the incidence of motor vehicle trauma is changing. We have watched as Friday and Saturday night emergencies have declined without a good explanation. Several other studies have investigated this, but the results were not conclusive.
We think that is due to a lack of data from the rideshare companies and hospitals directly
Dr. Flaherty[/caption]
Michael R. Flaherty, DO
Attending, Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Co-Director, Trauma and Injury Prevention Outreach Program, MGH
Instructor in Pediatrics,
Harvard Medical School
Boston, MA 02114
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: This study was a joint collaboration between Massachusetts General Hospital and Boston Children’s Hospital. The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) found an increasing incidence of rare earth magnet ingestions by children causing serious injury; Injuries are particularly serious when a child ingests two of these small magnets, or a magnet with another metal object – this can lead to bowel walls becoming attached and kinked, leading to catastrophic bowel injury and/or death.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission initiated campaigns to limit sales in 2012 with voluntary recalls and safety standards, as well as public awareness campaigns, legislative advocacy, and lawsuits. In October 2014, the CPSC published their final rule, “Safety Standard for Magnet Sets,” which prohibited the sale of magnets based on a pre-specified size and power scale, essentially eliminating the ability to sell SREMs. This rule was appealed by largest manufacturer of these magnets, Zen Magnets, LLC., and in November 2016 this rule was legally reversed by the U.S. Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit resulting in a resurgence of these magnets on the market.
Dr. Spitzer[/caption]
Sarabeth Spitzer, MD
Co-Chair of Board, Scrubs Addressing the Firearm Epidemic (SAFE)
Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Firearm injury is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, resulting in almost 40,000 deaths annually in the United States, but very little is known about the epidemiology of nonfatal firearm injuries. Nonfatal firearm injuries can have significant long-term morbidity and are associated with significant cost. We found that there were over 81,000 nonfatal firearm injuries in California over the study period. Over the period, there was a decrease in nonfatal firearm injuries by 38.1%, driven primarily by a decrease in assault injuries.
Dr. Desai[/caption]
Nimesh D. Desai, MD, PhD
Director, Thoracic Aortic Surgery Research Program
Associate Professor of Surgery
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Dr. Chase Brown: Opioid use in the United States is a public health emergency. We know that opioids prescribed after general surgery operations to patients who never received them within the year prior to their surgery are at increased risk for continuing to take opioids months later. However, this has not been studied in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, who often times have more severe post-operative pain.
Our goal in this study was to determine how many patients after cardiac surgery and are opioid naive are continuing to take opioids within 90-180 days after their surgery.