Anesthesiology, Author Interviews, JAMA, Stroke / 18.01.2018
General Anesthesia vs Conscious Sedation for Endovascular Therapy of Stroke
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
[caption id="attachment_39304" align="alignleft" width="128"]
Dr. Simonsen[/caption]
Dr. Claus Z. Simonsen, MD, PhD
Department of Neurology
Aarhus University Hospital
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Retrospective studies find worse outcome when performing (Endovascular Therapy) EVT under General Anesthesia (GA).
The main finding is that infarct growth in the Conscious Sedation (CS) and GA are not different. And that patients who had EVT under GA had a better outcome after 90 days. This is probably explained by better reperfusion rates under GA which was another part of the study that was surprising. Our neurointerventionalist are comfortable performing EVT under CS, but our study indicates that maybe it is easier to achieve reperfusion it the patient is anesthesized.
Dr. Simonsen[/caption]
Dr. Claus Z. Simonsen, MD, PhD
Department of Neurology
Aarhus University Hospital
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Response: Retrospective studies find worse outcome when performing (Endovascular Therapy) EVT under General Anesthesia (GA).
The main finding is that infarct growth in the Conscious Sedation (CS) and GA are not different. And that patients who had EVT under GA had a better outcome after 90 days. This is probably explained by better reperfusion rates under GA which was another part of the study that was surprising. Our neurointerventionalist are comfortable performing EVT under CS, but our study indicates that maybe it is easier to achieve reperfusion it the patient is anesthesized.






















