Author Interviews, Prostate Cancer / 17.05.2015
Understanding PSA Controversy Does Not Deter Men From Getting Tested
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Michael Fenstermaker MD
NYU School of Medicine | MD, MS | Class of 2015
Northwestern University | BA | Biochemistry, Psychology
Medical Research: What is the background for this study? What are the main findings?
Dr. Fenstermaker: The benefits of using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing to screen for prostate cancer are uncertain. In response to this, many medical societies have recently scaled back their recommendations for PSA screening. One common thread among these groups is that shared decision-making should guide whether or not men get tested. Shared decision-making is a process by which physicians and patients work together to make a medical decision that aligns with the patient’s values and follows the best available medical evidence.
Several studies have shown a decline in PSA testing since new guidelines have been published. While a decrease in screening is not necessarily problematic itself, it could be an issue if this is the result of fewer physicians discussing screening with their patients. Some experts worry that disparities in screening could develop, such that only informed patients go on to speak with their physicians and receive PSA testing. By analyzing data from a national survey, we had the chance to investigate just how much men know about the controversies leading to these guidelines changes and whether this knowledge influences PSA usage.
Our findings show that the majority of U.S. males of screening age report that they were not informed of many key facts important to understanding the risks and controversies surrounding PSA testing. Of particular concern, certain vulnerable populations, such as those without regular healthcare providers were less likely to be informed of these facts. Surprisingly, those men who had more awareness of the controversies about PSA testing were more likely to undergo testing. (more…)