Author Interviews, Lancet, OBGYNE, Surgical Research / 22.12.2016
Study Supports Mesh Surgery for Incontinence But Not for Bowel or Bladder Prolapse
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
Dr Rachael Wood PhD
Consultant in Public Health Medicine - women and children's health
NHS National Services Scotland
Information Services Division
Edinburgh
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Mesh surgery for female stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse is currently controversial.
Mesh surgery was introduced to overcome recognised limitations of traditional, non-mesh, surgery for these conditions, in particular extensive surgery and long hospital stays for incontinence and high failure/recurrence rates for prolapse. Mesh surgery may therefore offer additional benefits over traditional surgery. Mesh surgery may also carry additional risks however, with patient advocacy groups highlighting cases of severe, long term, mesh-related complications in some women who have undergone mesh surgery.
We therefore used routinely available, population based hospital discharge records from Scotland to identify women having mesh and non-mesh procedures for incontinence and prolapse. We then followed the women up for up to 5 years to assess how often they were readmitted for complications or further incontinence or prolapse surgery.
(more…)