AstraZeneca, Author Interviews, Diabetes, Heart Disease, JAMA / 01.04.2020
Benefit in Heart Failure Demonstrates Dapagliflozin – FARXIGA is Not Just a Diabetes Drug
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
[caption id="attachment_53705" align="alignleft" width="136"]
Prof. McMurray[/caption]
John J. V. McMurray, MD FRCP FESC FACC FAHA FRSE FMedSci
British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre
University of Glasgow
Glasgow, United Kingdom
[caption id="attachment_53709" align="alignleft" width="200"]
Dr. Docherty[/caption]
Kieran F Docherty
DAPA-HF investigator
British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre,
University of Glasgow
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: DAPA-HF was a double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily with placebo in 4744 patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
The primary outcome was a composite of time to occurrence of a worsening heart failure event (principally heart failure hospitalization) or cardiovascular death, whichever came first.
Dapagliflozin reduced the primary outcome by 26% and reduced the risk of each of heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death individually, as well as overall mortality. Patient symptoms were also improved.
The aim of the present report was to examine the effect of dapagliflozin separately in patients with and without type 2 diabetes at baseline (45/55% split in the trial). The reason for this was that dapagliflozin was originally introduced as a glucose-lowering medication for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. We find that dapagliflozin was equally beneficial in patients with and without diabetes and was as well tolerated in patients without diabetes as in those with diabetes. More remarkably, among the patients without diabetes, dapagliflozin was as effective in participants with a completely normal glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) as in those with prediabetes. In patients with a normal HbA1c, dapagliflozin did not lead to any reduction in HbA1c, but did improve clinical outcomes.
Prof. McMurray[/caption]
John J. V. McMurray, MD FRCP FESC FACC FAHA FRSE FMedSci
British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre
University of Glasgow
Glasgow, United Kingdom
[caption id="attachment_53709" align="alignleft" width="200"]
Dr. Docherty[/caption]
Kieran F Docherty
DAPA-HF investigator
British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre,
University of Glasgow
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: DAPA-HF was a double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily with placebo in 4744 patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
The primary outcome was a composite of time to occurrence of a worsening heart failure event (principally heart failure hospitalization) or cardiovascular death, whichever came first.
Dapagliflozin reduced the primary outcome by 26% and reduced the risk of each of heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death individually, as well as overall mortality. Patient symptoms were also improved.
The aim of the present report was to examine the effect of dapagliflozin separately in patients with and without type 2 diabetes at baseline (45/55% split in the trial). The reason for this was that dapagliflozin was originally introduced as a glucose-lowering medication for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. We find that dapagliflozin was equally beneficial in patients with and without diabetes and was as well tolerated in patients without diabetes as in those with diabetes. More remarkably, among the patients without diabetes, dapagliflozin was as effective in participants with a completely normal glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) as in those with prediabetes. In patients with a normal HbA1c, dapagliflozin did not lead to any reduction in HbA1c, but did improve clinical outcomes.
Dr. Bin Cao[/caption]
Bin Cao, Yeming Wang, Guohui Fan,
Lianghan Shang, Jiuyang Xu, DingyuZhang, Chen Wang
on behalf of LOTUS-China Study Group
China-Japan Friendship Hospital; Wuhan Jintinyan Hospital;
Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: In the past two months, the outbreak of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been spreading rapidly across the world. Science and technology is the most powerful weapon for human to fight against diseases, especially in such a pandemic setting. Seeking for effective antiviral medication is the most critical and urgent among the many scientific tasks in the pandemic.
At the most critical moment in the fight against COVID-19, Chinese clinical scientists have stepped forward under extremely difficult research conditions to carry out clinical trials in antiviral treatment including lopinavir–ritonavir and remdesivir, in a swift, decisive and effective manner. These trials have attracted worldwide attention.
Recently, the Lopinavir–ritonavir Trial for suppression of SARS-CoV-2 in China (LOTUS-China) has been completed, which, with great clinical significance, can provide strong evidence for the treatment of COVID-19 both in China and around the world.

Dr. Jeffrey Smith[/caption]
Jeffrey R. Smith, MD PhD
Department of Medicine, Division of Genetic Medicine
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, and Vanderbilt Genetics Institute
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Medical Research Service
Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Veterans Administration
Nashville, TN
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Roughly 20% of men with prostate cancer have a family history of the disease, and 5% meet criteria for hereditary prostate cancer. Although prostate cancer has the greatest heritability of all common cancers (twice that of breast cancer), extensive heterogeneity of its inherited causes has presented a considerable obstacle for traditional pedigree-based genetic investigative approaches. Inherited causes across, as well as within families are diverse.
This study introduced a new familial case-control study design that uses extent of family history as a proxy for genetic burden. It compared a large number of men with prostate cancer, each from a separate family with a strong history of the disease, to screened men with no personal or family history. The study comprehensively deconstructs how the 8q24 chromosomal region impacts risk of hereditary prostate cancer, introducing several new analytical approaches. The locus had been known to alter risk of prostate, breast, colon, ovarian, and numerous additional cancers.


