Annals Internal Medicine, Author Interviews, Biomarkers, Heart Disease / 23.12.2019
Biomarker Predicts Perioperative Cardiovascular Complications
MedicalResearch.com Interview with:
[caption id="attachment_52542" align="alignleft" width="150"]
Dr. Devereaux[/caption]
Dr. PJ Devereaux MD, PhD, FRCP(C)
Director of the Division of Cardiology
Scientific Leader
Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine, and Surgical Research Group
Population Health Research Institute
McMaster University
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: There is an ethical obligation to provide patients with an accurate estimation of the potential benefits of surgery and the potential risks, to facilitate informed decision making about the appropriateness of surgery. There are two common approaches to risk estimation.
First, physicians commonly use clinical risk indices. Based upon a patient’s clinical history (e.g., history of prior heart attack or stroke) an estimate of perioperative risk is determined. Research demonstrates that these clinical risk indices have suboptimal risk discrimination capabilities, and they will underestimate risk in many patients.
The second approach that has commonly been used is to have patients undergo an expensive and time consuming non-invasive cardiac test (e.g., stress nuclear cardiac study). Although these non-invasive cardiac tests can enhance risk estimation in some patients who will have a perioperative cardiac event, these tests more commonly exaggerate risk in patients who will not have a complication.
Dr. Devereaux[/caption]
Dr. PJ Devereaux MD, PhD, FRCP(C)
Director of the Division of Cardiology
Scientific Leader
Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine, and Surgical Research Group
Population Health Research Institute
McMaster University
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: There is an ethical obligation to provide patients with an accurate estimation of the potential benefits of surgery and the potential risks, to facilitate informed decision making about the appropriateness of surgery. There are two common approaches to risk estimation.
First, physicians commonly use clinical risk indices. Based upon a patient’s clinical history (e.g., history of prior heart attack or stroke) an estimate of perioperative risk is determined. Research demonstrates that these clinical risk indices have suboptimal risk discrimination capabilities, and they will underestimate risk in many patients.
The second approach that has commonly been used is to have patients undergo an expensive and time consuming non-invasive cardiac test (e.g., stress nuclear cardiac study). Although these non-invasive cardiac tests can enhance risk estimation in some patients who will have a perioperative cardiac event, these tests more commonly exaggerate risk in patients who will not have a complication.
Dr. Aaron Elliott[/caption]
Dr. Aaron Elliott, PhD
CEO
Dr. Chen[/caption]
Tiffany Won-Shau Chen MD
Internal Medicine Residency
Mount Sinai Beth Israel
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: The research I presented on details a randomized, prospective study done to evaluate whether it would be feasible and effective to implement a yoga program for breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy that could reduce patients' chemotherapy-related symptoms and improve their quality of life.
50 patients were recruited, half of whom underwent a 12-week long yoga program with weekly courses, while the other half did not participate in the program.
Surveys were completed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks assessing patients' functional wellbeing, sleep quality, and anxiety/depression levels.
Dr. Cohen[/caption]
Pieter A. Cohen, MD
Department of Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance
Somerville, Massachusetts
Harvard Medical School
Boston, Massachusetts
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: There has been increasing interest in the use of over-the-counter supplements to help improve memory and cognitive function. However, prior
Dr. Ritch[/caption]
Robert Ritch, MD, FACS, FARVO
Shelley and Steven Einhorn Distinguished Chair
Professor of Ophthalmology, Surgeon Director Emeritus
Chief, Glaucoma Services Emeritus
The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai
New York, NY 10003
Founder, Medical Director and
Chairman, Scientific Advisory Board
The Glaucoma Foundation
MedicalResearch.com: What is the background for this study?
Response: Nailfold capillaroscopy (NFC), long used in rheumatology is a new approach to investigation of glaucoma.
Posterior to the nailbed and just anterior to the proximal nailfold is the cuticle, which has no structural elements visible to the naked eye. NFC is a non-invasive imaging modality that provides a highly magnified view of the capillaries at the nailfold of digits. It has also been used in ophthalmology to show morphological changes at the nailfold capillaries of POAG and XFG/XFS patients, helping to confirm the systemic nature of these diseases.
[caption id="attachment_52469" align="alignleft" width="400"]